Literature DB >> 27400304

Silent cerebral injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and the preventive role of embolic protection devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Matteo Pagnesi1, Enrico A Martino2, Mauro Chiarito1, Antonio Mangieri1, Richard J Jabbour3, Nicolas M Van Mieghem4, Susheel K Kodali5, Cosmo Godino1, Giovanni Landoni6, Antonio Colombo7, Azeem Latib8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were: 1) to evaluate silent cerebral injury detected by cerebral diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI); and 2) to assess the efficacy of embolic protection devices (EPDs) on DW-MRI endpoints.
METHODS: We included in a pooled analysis 25 prospective studies reporting post-procedural cerebral DW-MRI data after TAVI (n=1225). Among these studies, we included in a meta-analysis 6 studies investigating TAVI performed with versus without EPDs (n=384). Primary endpoints were the number of new lesions per patient and the total lesion volume, while secondary endpoints were the number of patients with new lesions and the single lesion volume.
RESULTS: The main pooled DW-MRI outcomes were: patients with new ischemic lesions, 77.5% (95% confidence interval=71.7-83.3%); total lesion volume, 437.5mm(3) (286.7-588.3mm(3)); single lesion volume, 78.1mm(3) (56.7-99.5mm(3)); and number of new lesions per patient, 4.2 (3.4-5.0). The use of EPDs was associated with a significant reduction in total lesion volume (mean difference [95% confidence interval]=-111.1mm(3) [-203.6 to -18.6mm(3)]; p=0.02) and single lesion volume (-12.1mm(3) [-18.3 to -6.0mm(3)]; p=0.0001) after TAVI.
CONCLUSIONS: Silent cerebral injury occurs in the majority of patients undergoing TAVI and DW-MRI allows a precise characterization of new ischemic brain lesions. EPDs reduce the total and single volume of such lesions detected after the procedure, although the number of new lesions per patient and the number of patients with new lesions are not significantly reduced by such devices.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain injury; Cerebral ischemia; Cerebral protection device; Magnetic resonance imaging; Meta-analysis; TAVI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27400304     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  11 in total

Review 1.  Cerebral embolic protection devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: clinical versus silent embolism.

Authors:  Luis Nombela-Franco; German Armijo; Gabriela Tirado-Conte
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Safety and Efficacy of Protected Cardiac Intervention: Clinical Evidence for Sentinel Cerebral Embolic Protection.

Authors:  Ulrich Schäfer
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-09

Review 3.  The Role of Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Ozan M Demir; Gianmarco Iannopollo; Antonio Mangieri; Marco B Ancona; Damiano Regazzoli; Satoru Mitomo; Antonio Colombo; Giora Weisz; Azeem Latib
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-10-23

Review 4.  Evolving Devices and Material in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: What to Use and for Whom.

Authors:  Mauro Chiarito; Alessandro Spirito; Johny Nicolas; Alexandra Selberg; Giulio Stefanini; Antonio Colombo; Bernhard Reimers; Annapoorna Kini; Samin K Sharma; George D Dangas; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Cerebral Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Luca Testa; Azeem Latib; Matteo Casenghi; Riccardo Gorla; Antonio Colombo; Francesco Bedogni
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 6.  Cerebral Protection Devices during Transcatheter Interventions: Indications, Benefits, and Limitations.

Authors:  Stephan Haussig; Axel Linke; Norman Mangner
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Can transcatheter aortic valve implantation improve cognition?

Authors:  Astrid van Nieuwkerk; Jan Baan; Ronak Delewi
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 8.  Impact of Complications During Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: How Can They Be Avoided and Managed?

Authors:  Roberto Scarsini; Giovanni L De Maria; Jubin Joseph; Lampson Fan; Thomas J Cahill; Rafail A Kotronias; Francesco Burzotta; James D Newton; Rajesh Kharbanda; Bernard Prendergast; Flavio Ribichini; Adrian P Banning
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Aortic valve calcification volumes and chronic brain infarctions in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Wieneke Vlastra; Thomas P W van den Boogert; Thomas Krommenhoek; Anne-Sophie G T Bronzwaer; Henk J M M Mutsaerts; Hakim C Achterberg; Esther E Bron; Wiro J Niessen; Charles B L M Majoie; Aart J Nederveen; Jan Baan; Johannes J van Lieshout; Jan J Piek; R Nils Planken; José P S Henriques; Ronak Delewi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Assessment of Retinal Capillary Dropout after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Jeanne Martine Gunzinger; Burbuqe Ibrahimi; Joel Baur; Maximilian Robert Justus Wiest; Marco Piccirelli; Athina Pangalu; Dominik Straumann; Fabian Nietlispach; Igal Moarof; Sandrine Anne Zweifel
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.