Literature DB >> 27399992

Fertility Treatments in the United States: Improving Access and Outcomes.

Dmitry M Kissin1, Sheree L Boulet, Denise J Jamieson.   

Abstract

The recently released National Public Health Action Plan for the Detection, Prevention, and Management of Infertility calls for better access to high-quality infertility services and improved safety of fertility treatments. Both assisted reproductive technology (ART) and non-ART fertility treatments have allowed millions of patients worldwide to overcome infertility-a disease of the reproductive system and important public health issue. However, there are substantial disparities in access to effective treatments in the United States, largely attributable to high out-of-pocket costs, especially for ART. Moreover, the outcomes of fertility treatments are often complicated by the large proportion of multiple births with substantial health risks for both neonates and mothers. Prevention of multiple births is difficult during non-ART fertility treatments but can be effective with single-embryo transfer during ART. Several U.S. states have enacted legislative mandates that require private insurers to cover some portion of the costs associated with fertility treatments and thus reduce the financial pressure to transfer multiple embryos during ART. Although studies have shown that insurance coverage reduces per-cycle multiple births to a certain degree, states with insurance mandates have more ART-related multiple births attributable to substantially larger number of ART-conceived neonates. Experience from other countries shows that access to ART can be improved without concomitant increases in multiple births by providing reimbursement for ART in combination with restrictions on the number of embryos transferred per cycle. Such approaches may or may not be successful in the United States with its unique and complex health care system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27399992      PMCID: PMC4970738          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  12 in total

1.  Assisted reproductive technology use in the United States: a population assessment.

Authors:  Katherine Tierney; Yong Cai
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Disparities in Assisted Reproductive Technology Utilization by Race and Ethnicity, United States, 2014: A Commentary.

Authors:  Ada C Dieke; Yujia Zhang; Dmitry M Kissin; Wanda D Barfield; Sheree L Boulet
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 3.  Child Health: Is It Really Assisted Reproductive Technology that We Need to Be Concerned About?

Authors:  Edwina H Yeung; Keewan Kim; Alexandra Purdue-Smithe; Griffith Bell; Jessica Zolton; Akhgar Ghassabian; Yassaman Vafai; Sonia L Robinson; Sunni L Mumford
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 1.303

4.  The Future of Assisted Reproductive Technology Live Births in the United States.

Authors:  Katherine Tierney
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2022-07-18

5.  Assisted hatching and live births in first-cycle frozen embryo transfers.

Authors:  Jennifer F Knudtson; Courtney M Failor; Jonathan A Gelfond; Martin W Goros; Tiencheng Arthur Chang; Robert S Schenken; Randal D Robinson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Self-reported barriers to accessing infertility care: patient perspectives from urban gynecology clinics.

Authors:  Iris G Insogna; Andrea Lanes; Eduardo Hariton; Tiffany Blake-Lamb; Susan Schilling; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2015.

Authors:  Saswati Sunderam; Dmitry M Kissin; Sara B Crawford; Suzanne G Folger; Sheree L Boulet; Lee Warner; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2018-02-16

8.  Health systems recovery from COVID-19: a window of opportunity for (in)fertility care.

Authors:  Clara Affun-Adegbulu; Nandini D P Sarkar; Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade Abejirinde; Sara Van Belle; Opemiposi Adegbulu
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2020-12

9.  Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2014.

Authors:  Saswati Sunderam; Dmitry M Kissin; Sara B Crawford; Suzanne G Folger; Denise J Jamieson; Lee Warner; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2017-02-10

10.  Infertility policy analysis: a comparative study of selected lower middle- middle- and high-income countries.

Authors:  Bahar Morshed-Behbahani; Minoor Lamyian; Hassan Joulaei; Batool Hossein Rashidi; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.