Literature DB >> 27398890

Perioperative Neurologic Complications in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Incidence and Risk Factors in 564 Patients.

Han Jo Kim1, Sravisht Iyer1, Luke P Zebala2, Michael P Kelly2, Daniel Sciubba3, Themistocles S Protopsaltis4, Munish Gupta2, Brian J Neuman3, Gregory M Mundis5, Christopher P Ames6, Justin S Smith7, Robert Hart8, Douglas Burton9, Eric O Klineberg10.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prognostic study-case controlled.
OBJECTIVE: Describe the rate of neurologic complications in adult spinal deformity surgery and describe the effect of these complications on clinical outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The incidence of neurologic complications and the risk factors for neurologic complications have not been reported in a large series of patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Existing series include a mixed patient cohort undergoing different types of spine surgery.
METHODS: Patients with ASD undergoing surgery between 2008 and 2014 were analyzed. Patients with neurologic complications were identified; demographics, operative details, and radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared. A subanalysis of those with surgical and nonsurgical (e.g., stroke) neurologic complications was performed. Statistical analysis included t tests or χ tests as appropriate and a multivariate analysis. A P value of less than 0.025 was considered significant.
RESULTS: A total of 564 patients met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 57 years. There were a total of 116 neurologic complications in 99 patients (17.6%). There were 88 surgical procedure-related neurologic complications in 77 patients (13.7%) and 28 nonsurgical neurologic complications in 28 patients (5.0%). The most common complications were radiculopathy (30%), motor deficits (22%), mental status changes (12%), and sensory deficits (12%). Revisions (odds ratio [OR] 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-2.4) and interbody fusions (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.2) were associated with an increased risk of neurologic complications. Decompression and osteotomies (including three-column osteotomies) did not increase the risk of neurologic complications. Patients with neurologic complications were not more likely to sustain other complications; however, they were more likely to undergo another operation during the follow-up period (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8).
CONCLUSION: The overall incidence of neurologic complications in ASD surgery was 17.6%. The incidence of surgical neurologic complications was 13.7%. There was a higher risk of neurologic complications in revision cases and in cases in which interbody fusion was required. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27398890     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Risk factors for medical complications after long-level internal fixation in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Xi-Nuo Zhang; Xiang-Yao Sun; Xiang-Long Meng; Yong Hai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Peak timing for complications after spine surgery].

Authors:  W Pepke; C Wantia; H Almansour; T Bruckner; M Thielen; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Bone Fusion Morphology after Circumferential Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screws without Bone Grafting in the Thoracic Spine: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Masayuki Ishihara; Shinichirou Taniguchi; Koki Kawashima; Takashi Adachi; Masaaki Paku; Yoichi Tani; Muneharu Ando; Takanori Saito
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.948

4.  The Double-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Innovative One-Stage Surgical Technique for Posterior Kyphosis Correction.

Authors:  Marcus Jäger; Tjark Tassemeier
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2017-06-27

5.  Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring for the Detection of Nerve Root Injury during Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Hiroki Ushirozako; Go Yoshida; Sho Kobayashi; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Yu Yamato; Tatsuya Yasuda; Tomohiro Banno; Hideyuki Arima; Shin Oe; Yuki Mihara; Daisuke Togawa; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-07-27

6.  Early and Late Reoperation Rates With Various MIS Techniques for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction.

Authors:  Robert K Eastlack; Ravi Srinivas; Gregory M Mundis; Stacie Nguyen; Praveen V Mummaneni; David O Okonkwo; Adam S Kanter; Neel Anand; Paul Park; Pierce Nunley; Juan S Uribe; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Dean Chou; Vedat Deviren
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-05-10

7.  Alteration of the Sitting and Standing Movement in Adult Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Eddy Saad; Karl Semaan; Georges Kawkabani; Abir Massaad; Renee Maria Salibv; Mario Mekhael; Marc Fakhoury; Krystel Abi Karam; Elena Jaber; Ismat Ghanem; Virginie Lafage; Wafa Skalli; Rami Rachkidi; Ayman Assi
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-13

8.  Spinopelvic Adaptations in Standing and Sitting Positions in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Rami El Rachkidi; Abir Massaad; Eddy Saad; Georges Kawkabani; Karl Semaan; Julien Abi Nahed; Ismat Ghanem; Virginie Lafage; Wafa Skalli; Ayman Assi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.