Literature DB >> 2739756

Stereoselective hemodynamic effects of (R)-and (S)-propranolol in man.

K Stoschitzky1, W Lindner, M Rath, C Leitner, G Uray, G Zernig, T Moshammer, W Klein.   

Abstract

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study 24 healthy volunteers were examined before and 2 h after oral administration of 80 mg (R,S)-, 40 mg (R)- and 40 mg (S)-propranolol.HCl; 8 of them received placebo in an additional run. During exercise on a bicycle ergometer and a rest period the rate pressure product was decreased by 80 mg (R,S)-propranolol.HCl (-32.8% p less than 0.0001) and 40 mg (S)-propranolol.HCl (-32.3%; p less than 0.0001), whereas 40 mg (R)-propranolol.HCl as well as placebo showed no effect. Corresponding binding inhibition experiments using (-)-(125I)iodocyanopindolol in a sarcolemma-enriched cardiac membrane preparation yielded a eudismic ratio of 179 for (S)- over (R)-propranolol. 2 h after oral application, stereospecific HPLC analysis revealed different individual concentrations in plasma of (R)- 22.3 +/- 21.7 ng/ml) and (S)-propranolol (30.4 +/- 26.9 ng/ml) when 80 mg of (R,S)-propranolol.HCl was administered. The plasma levels were similar when 40 mg of the pure enantiomer of (R)- (22.7 +/- 20.3 ng/ml) or (S)-propranolol.HCl (28.7 +/- 22.5 ng/ml) was applied. (R)- and (S)-propranolol are two substances with different pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. As there are methods available to produce the optically pure enantiomers, they should be used rather than the racemic mixture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2739756     DOI: 10.1007/bf00736064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol        ISSN: 0028-1298            Impact factor:   3.000


  21 in total

1.  Assay for calcium channels.

Authors:  H Glossmann; D R Ferry
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 2.  Stereoselectivity of bioactive xenobiotics. A pre-Pasteur attitude in medicinal chemistry, pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacology.

Authors:  E J Ariëns; E W Wuis; E J Veringa
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1988-01-01       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 3.  Stereoselective delivery and actions of beta receptor antagonists.

Authors:  T Walle; J G Webb; E E Bagwell; U K Walle; H B Daniell; T E Gaffney
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1988-01-01       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 4.  Beta-adrenergic blockade. An update.

Authors:  W H Frishman; M Teicher
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.869

5.  The beta-adrenergic receptor in human lymphocytes: subclassification by the use of a new radio-ligand, (+/-)-125 Iodocyanopindolol.

Authors:  O E Brodde; G Engel; D Hoyer; K D Bock; F Weber
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1981-11-23       Impact factor: 5.037

6.  Binding characteristics of (+)-, (+/-)- and (-)-[125iodo] cyanopindolol to guinea-pig left ventricle membranes.

Authors:  D Hoyer; G Engel; R Berthold
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Calculating the dissociation constant of an unlabeled compound from the concentration required to displace radiolabel binding by 50%.

Authors:  J Linden
Journal:  J Cyclic Nucleotide Res       Date:  1982

8.  Short-term clinical trial of phopranolol in racemic form (Inderal), D-propranolol and placebo in migraine.

Authors:  P Stensrud; O Sjaastad
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 3.209

9.  The human carcinoma cell line A431 possesses large numbers of functional beta-adrenergic receptors.

Authors:  C Delavier-Klutchko; J Hoebeke; A D Strosberg
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1984-04-24       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 10.  Beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs: adverse reactions and drug interactions.

Authors:  M J Kendall; L Beeley
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 12.310

View more
  7 in total

1.  pH Dependent but not P-gp Dependent Bidirectional Transport Study of S-propranolol: The Importance of Passive Diffusion.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Leslie Z Benet; Hideaki Okochi; Xijing Chen
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Propranolol oxidation by human liver microsomes--the use of cumene hydroperoxide to probe isoenzyme specificity and regio- and stereoselectivity.

Authors:  S V Otton; E M Gillam; M S Lennard; G T Tucker; H F Woods
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Identification of human CYP isoforms involved in the metabolism of propranolol enantiomers--N-desisopropylation is mediated mainly by CYP1A2.

Authors:  K Yoshimoto; H Echizen; K Chiba; M Tani; T Ishizaki
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Enhancing in vivo effect of propranolol on human lymphocyte function is not due to stereospecific beta-adrenergic blockade.

Authors:  H Mangge; B Pietsch; W Lindner; H Warnkross; G Leb; K Schauenstein
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1993-03

5.  The effects of the stereoisomers of propafenone and diprafenone in guinea-pig heart.

Authors:  K Groschner; W Lindner; H Schnedl; W R Kukovetz
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  A comparative study of nebivolol and (S) atenolol on blood pressure and heart rate on essential hypertensive patients.

Authors:  G N Sahana; N Sarala; T N Kumar; V Lakshmaiah
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.200

7.  In vivo evaluation of antimyotonic efficacy of β-adrenergic drugs in a rat model of myotonia.

Authors:  Jean-François Desaphy; Teresa Costanza; Roberta Carbonara; Diana Conte Camerino
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 5.250

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.