Literature DB >> 14749582

Distribution and determinants of health and work status in a comprehensive population of injury patients.

Willem Jan Meerding1, Caspar W N Looman, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot, Hidde Toet, Saakje Mulder, Ed F van Beeck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insight into the distribution and determinants of both short- and long-term disability can be used to prioritize the development of prevention policies and to improve trauma care. We report on a large follow-up study in a comprehensive population of injury patients.
METHODS: We fielded a postal questionnaire in a stratified sample of 4,639 nonhospitalized and hospitalized injury patients aged 15 years and older, at 2, 5, and 9 months after injury. We gathered sociodemographic information, data on functional outcome with a generic instrument for health status measurement (EuroQol EQ-5D+) and data on work absence.
RESULTS: The response rates were 39%, 75%, and 68% after 2, 5, and 9 months, respectively. The reported data were adjusted for response bias and stratification. The 2-month health status of nonhospitalized patients was comparable to the general population's health when measured by the EQ-5D summary score, although considerable prevalence of restrictions in usual activities (24.0%) and pain and discomfort (34.8%) were reported. Hospitalized patients reported higher prevalences of disability in all health domains. Their mean EQ-5D summary score increased from 0.62 at 2 months to 0.74 at 5 months but remained below the population norm at 9 months, particularly for patients with a long hospital stay. Patients with injuries of the spinal cord and vertebral column, hip fracture, and other lower extremity fractures reported the worst health status, also when adjusted for age, sex, and educational level. Age, sex, type of injury, length of stay, educational level, motor vehicle injury, medical operation, intensive care unit admission, and number of injuries were all significant predictors of functioning. Nonhospitalized and hospitalized injury patients lost on average 5.2 and 72.1 work days, respectively. Of nonhospitalized patients, 5% had not yet returned to work after 2 months, and 39%, 20%, and 10% of hospitalized patients had not yet returned to work after 2, 5, and 9 months, respectively. In a multivariate regression analysis, length of stay, type of injury, level of education, and intensive care unit admission appeared to be significant predictors of absence duration and return to work.
CONCLUSION: Injury is a major source of disease burden and work absence. Both hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients contribute significantly to this burden.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14749582     DOI: 10.1097/01.TA.0000062969.65847.8B

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  37 in total

1.  Priorities in injury epidemiology.

Authors:  Ed van Beeck
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Temporal trends in vascular trauma in Ontario, 1991-2009: a population-based study.

Authors:  Abdulmajeed Altoijry; Mohammed Al-Omran; K Wayne Johnston; Muhammad Mamdani; Thomas F Lindsay
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-06-08

3.  Psychological morbidity and return to work after injury: multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Denise Kendrick; Paula Dhiman; Blerina Kellezi; Carol Coupland; Jessica Whitehead; Kate Beckett; Nicola Christie; Judith Sleney; Jo Barnes; Stephen Joseph; Richard Morriss
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Quality of life outcomes in a hospitalized sample of road users involved in crashes.

Authors:  Jo Barnes; Pete Thomas
Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med       Date:  2006

5.  [A phase model of trauma rehabilitation : How can we avoid the "rehab-hole"?]

Authors:  Stefan Simmel; Wolf-Dieter Müller; Christoph Reimertz; Christian Kühne; Jean-Jacques Glaesener
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Improved and standardized method for assessing years lived with disability after injury.

Authors:  J A Haagsma; S Polinder; R A Lyons; J Lund; V Ditsuwan; M Prinsloo; J L Veerman; E F van Beeck
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 7.  How well do we report on compensation systems in studies of return to work: a systematic review.

Authors:  Fiona J Clay; Janneke Berecki-Gisolf; Alex Collie
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-03

8.  Potential for bone turnover markers to cost-effectively identify and select post-menopausal osteopenic women at high risk of fracture for bisphosphonate therapy.

Authors:  J T Schousboe; D C Bauer; J A Nyman; R L Kane; L J Melton; K E Ensrud
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Work and Health Questionnaire (WHQ): A Screening Tool for Identifying Injured Workers at Risk for a Complicated Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sandra Abegglen; Ulrike Hoffmann-Richter; Volker Schade; Hans-Jörg Znoj
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-06

10.  Individual and population burdens of major trauma in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Herman R Holtslag; Eduard F van Beeck; Rob A Lichtveld; Loek Ph Leenen; Eline Lindeman; Chris van der Werken
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 9.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.