| Literature DB >> 27391031 |
Keya Chatterjee1, Rajesh Kumar Sinha2, Alok Kumar Kundu2, Dhananjay Shankar2, Rajkumar Gope2, Nirmala Nair2, Prasanta K Tripathy2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Jharkhand, a state with substantial tribal population in Eastern India has very high rate of undernutrition. The study tries to understand the social determinants of inequities in under-nutrition (weight-for-age) among children aged less than 5 years, in Gumla District of the State.Entities:
Keywords: Gender; Inequity; Maternal education; Poverty; Social determinants; Tribal; Underweight
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27391031 PMCID: PMC4938901 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-016-0392-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Equity Health ISSN: 1475-9276
Definition of Variables
| Variable | Definition |
|---|---|
| DEPENDENT VARIABLE | |
| Underweight | Categorical Variable: Whether family whose children were underweight; Yes = 1 and No = 0 |
| INDEPENDENT VARIABLES | |
| Sex of the child | Dummy variable = 1 if sex of the child was male, otherwise = 0 for sex of the child female |
| Social Status of the Family | Dummy variable = 1 if the family was ST, otherwise = 0 if family was Non-ST |
| Participation in any community based organization (CBO) | Dummy variable = 1 if any member of the family was participating in any CBO, otherwise = 0 if nobody from the family was participating in any CBO |
| Mother literacy | Dummy variable = 1 if the mother of the child possess educational qualification above Matriculation, otherwise = 0 if the mother was not educated or her education was less than matriculation. |
|
| |
| Lower 20 % ~ Quintile 1 | Dummy variable = 1 if the family’s’ asset base was Lowest 20 %. |
| Lower 20 % ~ Quintile 2 | Dummy variable = 1 if the family’s’ asset base was Lower 20 %. |
| Middle 20 % ~ Quintile 3 | Dummy variable = 1 if the family’s’ asset base was Middle 20 % |
| Higher 20 % ~ Quintile 4 | Dummy variable = 1 if the family’s’ asset base was Higher 20 %. |
| Highest 20 % ~ Quintile 5 | Dummy variable = 1 if the family’s’ asset base was Highest 20 % |
Respondent profile
| Characteristics | Numbers | Percentages |
|---|---|---|
| Total participants | 1070 | 100 |
| Male | 542 | 51 |
| Female | 528 | 49 |
| Communities | ||
| Oraon | 324 | 30 |
| Munda | 172 | 16 |
| Khariya | 118 | 11 |
| Smaller ST groups | 86 | 8 |
| OBC & Others | 700 | 35 |
| Mother’s Educational Level | ||
| Illiterate | 379 | 35 |
| Upto Std 5th | 303 | 28 |
| Std 6–8th | 164 | 15 |
| Std 9–10th | 144 | 13 |
| Above Matriculation (Std 10th) | 80 | 7 |
Fig. 1Weight for age z-score for all children
Fig. 2Weight for age z-score for all girls and boys
Multivariate analysis of weight-for-age
| Characteristics | Coefficient (S. E.) | Exp(B) |
|---|---|---|
| Sex (Male = 1, Female = 0) | 0.112 (0.122) | 1.119 |
| Social Status (ST = 1, Non-ST = 0) | 0.002 (0.134) | 1.002 |
| CBOParticipation (Yes = 1, No = 0) | −0.031 (0.128) | .969 |
| Motherliteracy (No Edu. Or less than Matriculation = 0, Above Matriculation = 1) | −0.168 (0.162) | 0.845 |
|
| ||
| Quintile 1 | 0.531 (0.210) | 1.700** |
| Quintile 2 | 0.406 (0.205) | 1.500** |
| Quintile 3 | 0.167 (0.198) | 1.181 |
| Quintile 4 | 0.480 (0.197) | 1.617** |
| Quintile-5 was the reference group | ||
| Constant | −0.168 (0.186) | .845 |
|
| 1094 | |
|
| 0.813 | |
|
| 0.060 | |
|
| 0.02 | |
|
| 1493.976 | |
| **p < 0n05 |
Fig. 3Proportion of Underweight Children in Tribal-and Non-Tribal Communities
Fig. 4Proportion of population and nutritional status of children
Fig. 5Proportion of Social Groups by Wealth Ranking
Fig. 6Proportion of Underweight Children (−2SD) vis-a-vis Maternal Education
Fig. 7Proportion of Severe Underweight Children (−3SD) vis-a-vis Maternal Education