| Literature DB >> 32959613 |
Shantanu Sharma1,2, Faiyaz Akhtar2, Rajesh Kumar Singh2, Sunil Mehra2.
Abstract
Pre-school age (3-5 years) children are vulnerable to malnutrition due to poor dietary intake, dietary habits, and socio-economic conditions. Children from marginalized families are more vulnerable than non-marginalized families due to limited access to health- and nutrition-related services, besides other socio-economic factors. This study was done to assess the dietary intakes, patterns, and determinants of pre-school age (3-5 years) children from marginalized populations in two districts of Odisha. We used three different questionnaires, namely general demographic information, single 24-h recall dietary survey, and food frequency questionnaire, to collect data. Dietary patterns were obtained using principal component analysis, and the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) method was applied to estimate the prevalence of inadequate intake. A general linear model of regression was used to investigate the relationship of dietary patterns scores with independent variables. A total of 86 boys (57.3%) and 64 girls (42.7%) were recruited for the study. The majority (more than two-third) of the children had <70% of RDA of iron, vitamin C, and zinc. The three dietary components that best described the dietary patterns among children in the study were vegetarian, non-vegetarian, and mixed patterns. They explained 54.9% of the variability. The 'vegetarian' dietary pattern was inversely associated with children whose mothers were illiterate (p = 0.005), who lived in families having per capita family monthly income less than INR 786 (10.3 US$) (p = 0.007), and who were first born (p = 0.04). The dietary patterns may help interventionists in designing programs aimed at preventing malnutrition and chronic diseases among children in marginalized communities.Entities:
Keywords: Diet; food; nutrition assessment; nutrition survey
Year: 2020 PMID: 32959613 PMCID: PMC7758846 DOI: 10.2991/jegh.k.200515.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Epidemiol Glob Health ISSN: 2210-6006
Figure 1Location of the study districts (Balangir and Nuapada) in the State of Odisha.
District-wise distribution of socio-demographic factors, cooking practices, water, sanitation hygiene, and access to health care practices of the families of children under 5 years across two districts (n = 150)
| Socio-demographic factors | |||
| Mean age of the children (months) (mean ± SD) | 43.2 ± 11.2 | 43.5 ± 9.9 | 0.8 |
| Mean age of the mother (years) (mean ± SD) | 28.2 ± 4.7 | 29.3 ± 5.7 | 0.2 |
| Birth order of the child (mean ± SD) | 1.8 ± 0.9 | 2.3 ± 1.4 | |
| Mean family members (mean ± SD) | 5.1 ± 2.0 | 5.6 ± 2.0 | 0.1 |
| Education status of the mothers | |||
| Illiterate | 26 (34.6) | 44 (58.6) | |
| Formal education | 49 (65.4) | 31 (41.4) | |
| Social class of the family | |||
| Scheduled tribe | 37 (49.3) | 49 (65.3) | 0.1 |
| Other backward classes | 21 (28.1) | 17 (22.7) | |
| Scheduled caste | 16 (21.3) | 7 (9.3) | |
| Non-backward class | 1 (1.3) | 2 (2.7) | |
| Types of house | |||
| | 3 (4.0) | 4 (5.3) | 0.7 |
| | 18 (24.0) | 14 (18.7) | |
| | 54 (72.0) | 57 (76.0) | |
| Overcrowding | |||
| Yes | 18 (24.0) | 24 (32.0) | 0.2 |
| No | 57 (76.0) | 51 (68.0) | |
| Per capita monthly income (tertiles) | |||
| <INR 786 (10.3 US$) | 22 (29.3) | 28 (37.3) | 0.4 |
| Between INR 786 (10.3 US$) and 1500 (19.5 US$) | 26 (34.7) | 27 (36.0) | |
| More than INR 1500 (19.5 US$) | 27 (36.0) | 20 (26.7) | |
| Cooking practices | |||
| Place of cooking | |||
| Open | 18 (24.0) | 13 (17.3) | |
| Separate kitchen | 26 (34.7) | 56 (74.7) | |
| Common place | 18 (24.0) | 5 (6.7) | |
| Both inside and outside the house | 13 (17.3) | 1 (1.3) | |
| Types of cooking fuel | |||
| Solid fuel (fire wood) | 71 (94.7) | 73 (97.3) | 0.5 |
| LPG | 4 (5.3) | 2 (2.7) | |
| Materials for cooking utensils | |||
| Iron | 18 (24.0) | 9 (12.0) | |
| Aluminium | 69 (92.0) | 55 (73.3) | |
| Stainless steel | 6 (8.0) | 26 (34.7) | |
| Types of cooking oil | |||
| Local natural oil ( | 46 (61.3) | 56 (74.7) | |
| Rice bran oil | 22 (29.3) | 15 (20.0) | |
| Others | 7 (9.3) | 4 (5.3) | |
| WASH factors | |||
| Place of sanitation (defecation) | |||
| Currently using improved sanitation (flush latrine) | 3 (4.0) | 2 (2.6) | |
| Currently using unimproved sanitation (pit latrine or open defecation) | 72 (96.0) | 73 (97.4) | |
| Mean hygiene score | 8.7 ± 1.1 | 8.5 ± 1.7 | 0.4 |
| Access to services | |||
| Number of antenatal care visits by mother during pregnancy of the index child | |||
| Less than three | 19 (25.3) | 3 (4) | <0.001 |
| Three or more | 56 (74.7) | 72 (96.0) | |
| Is child registered at ICDS ( | |||
| Yes | 71 (94.7) | 71 (94.7) | 1 |
| No | 4 (5.3) | 4 (5.3) | |
Pucca houses are made with high quality materials throughout, including the floor, roof, and exterior walls. Houses made from mud, thatch, or other low-quality materials are called kachha houses and houses that use partly low- and high-quality materials are called semi-pucca houses.
The sum of the columns may be more than 100% because it was multiple option question.
Others include mustard oil, sunflower oil, and palm oil.
A composite index of 10 indicators.
p-value <0.05 is considered statistically significant (highlighted in bold).
INR, Indian Rupees; LPG, Liquefied petroleum gas.
Percentage distribution of children under 5 years who had inadequate intake of energy and nutrients across two districts of Odisha (n = 150)
| Energy (Kcal) | |||
| <4 years | 1060 | 12 (18.2) | 10 (13.5) |
| 4–6 years | 1350 | 14 (21.2) | 22 (29.7) |
| Missing ( | 9 | 1 | |
| Protein (g) | |||
| <4 years | 16.7 | 5 (7.4) | 3 (4.1) |
| 4–6 years | 20.1 | 5 (7.4) | 7 (9.6) |
| Missing ( | 7 | 2 | |
| Fat (g) | |||
| <4 years | 27 | 20 (28.2) | 23 (31.9) |
| 4–6 years | 25 | 19 (26.8) | 33 (45.8) |
| Missing ( | 4 | 3 | |
| Calcium (mg) | 600 | 70 (100.0) | 73 (100.0) |
| Missing ( | 5 | 2 | |
| Iron (mg) | |||
| <4 years | 09 | 24 (37.5) | 22 (29.3) |
| 4–6 years | 13 | 21 (32.8) | 36 (48.0) |
| Missing ( | 11 | 0 | |
| Vitamin C (mg) | 40 | 48 (73.8) | 55 (83.3) |
| Missing ( | 10 | 9 | |
| Zinc (mg) | |||
| <4 years | 5 | 22 (36.1) | 19 (26.8) |
| 4–6 years | 7 | 23 (37.7) | 30 (42.3) |
| Missing ( | 14 | 4 | |
| Folic acid total (mcg) | |||
| <4 years | 80 | 9 (14.8) | 5 (7.0) |
| 4–6 years | 100 | 11 (18.0) | 11 (15.5) |
| Missing ( | 14 | 4 | |
mcg, microgram.
Factor loadings for food groups in varimax rotated principal components for 3–5-year-old children
| Eigenvalue | 3.35 | 2.05 | 1.18 |
| Percentage variance explained | 27.96 | 17.08 | 9.88 |
| Cereals and millets | −0.02 | −0.11 | |
| Pulses | −0.11 | −0.21 | |
| Green leafy vegetables | 0.03 | 0.05 | |
| Other vegetables | −0.19 | 0.18 | |
| Roots and tubers | 0.17 | 0.14 | |
| Fruits | 0.12 | 0.14 | |
| Meat | 0.07 | −0.13 | |
| Snacks | −0.09 | 0.08 | |
| Eggs | 0.12 | ||
| Milk | −0.11 | ||
| Oil and fats | −0.21 | ||
| Sugar | −0.09 | −0.22 |
Values <0.3 or >0.3 are highlighted in bold.
Regression analysis of the association between dietary pattern 1 and various socio-demographic, WASH, and access to services factors
| Socio-demographic variables | ||||||
| Gender | ||||||
| Female | −0.061 (−0.383, 0.261) | 0.708 | −0.045 (−0.377, 0.287) | 0.787 | 0.031 (−0.304, 0.365) | 0.857 |
| Male | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Educational status of the mother | ||||||
| Illiterate | ||||||
| Educated | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Per capita monthly income (tertiles) | ||||||
| Less than INR 786 | ||||||
| Between INR 786 and 1500 | −0.223 (−0.614, 0.168) | 0.261 | −0.236 (−0.650, 0.179) | 0.263 | −0.323 (−0.738, −0.092) | 0.126 |
| More than INR 1500 | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Overcrowding in the house | ||||||
| Yes | 0.173 (−0.205, 0.551) | 0.366 | 0.178 (−0.203, 0.559) | 0.357 | 0.118 (−0.258, 0.494) | 0.535 |
| No | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Birth order of the index child | ||||||
| First | ||||||
| Second or later | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Types of house | ||||||
| | −0.216 (−0.967, 0.535) | 0.571 | −0.190 (−0.962, 0.582) | 0.628 | −0.197 (−0.957, 0.563) | 0.609 |
| | −0.119 (−0.512, 0.274) | 0.550 | −0.098 (−0.507, 0.312) | 0.638 | −0.056 (−0.461, 0.350) | 0.786 |
| | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Age of the child (months) | −0.006 (−0.021, 0.009) | 0.444 | −0.005 (−0.020, 0.010) | 0.475 | −0.002 (−0.017, 0.013) | 0.752 |
| WASH factors | ||||||
| Place of sanitation (defecation) | ||||||
| Currently using improved sanitation (flush latrine) | – | – | −0.26 (−1.16, 0.63) | 0.5 | −0.341 (−1.242, 0.560) | 0.455 |
| Currently using unimproved sanitation* (pit latrine or open defecation) | Reference | Reference | ||||
| Hygiene score | – | – | 0.005 (−0.115, 0.124) | 0.938 | −0.009 (−0.128, 0.110) | 0.878 |
| Access to services | ||||||
| Number of antenatal care visits by mother during pregnancy of the index child | ||||||
| Less than three | – | – | – | – | 0.068 (−0.384, 0.521) | 0.766 |
| Three or more* | Reference | |||||
| Is child registered at ICDS ( | ||||||
| Yes | – | – | – | – | ||
| No* | Reference | |||||
Model II: Model I + WASH factors.
Model III: Model II + access to services.
INR 786 = 10.3 USD; INR 1500 = 19.5 USD. Model I: R2 = 13.8%, Adjusted R2 = 8.3%; Model II: R2 = 14.1%; Adjusted R2 = 7.2%; Model III: R2 = 20.2%; Adjusted R2 = 12.3%;
B, Beta coefficient; CI, confidence interval; p-value <0.05 is considered statistically significant (highlighted in bold).
Regression analysis of the association between dietary pattern 2 and various socio-demographic, WASH, and access to services factors
| Socio-demographic variables | ||||||
| Gender | ||||||
| Female | 0.041 (−0.287, 0.368) | 0.806 | 0.047 (−0.290, 0.385) | 0.6 | 0.079 (−0.267, 0.425) | 0.654 |
| Male | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Educational status of the mother | ||||||
| Illiterate | −0.222 (−0.548, 0.105) | 0.182 | −0.233 (−0.561, 0.096) | 0.164 | −0.219 (−0.554, 0.116) | 0.197 |
| Educated* | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Per capita monthly income (tertiles) | ||||||
| Less than INR 786 | ||||||
| Between INR 786 and 1500 | 0.365 (−0.064, 0.793) | 0.095 | ||||
| More than INR 1500* | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Overcrowding in the house | ||||||
| Yes | −0.167 (−0.552, 0.218) | 0.394 | −0.157 (−0.544, 0.230) | 0.424 | −0.190 (−0.579, 0.198) | 0.335 |
| No* | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Birth order of the index child | ||||||
| First | 0.158 (−0.176, 0.491) | 0.351 | 0.151 (−0.187, 0.489) | 0.378 | 0.104 (−0.240, 0.448) | 0.550 |
| Second or later | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Types of house | ||||||
| | 0.693 (−0.073, 1.458) | 0.076 | 0.775 (−0.009, 1.560) | 0.053 | 0.735 (−0.051, 1.520) | 0.067 |
| | 0.168 (−0.232, 0.568) | 0.408 | 0.227 (−0.189, 0.489) | 0.283 | 0.185 (−0.234, 0.604) | 0.384 |
| | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Age of the child | 0.010 (−0.005, 0.025) | 0.205 | 0.01 (−0.005, 0.02) | 0.187 | 0.013 (−0.003, 0.028) | 0.110 |
| WASH Factors | ||||||
| Place of sanitation (defecation) | ||||||
| Currently using improved sanitation (flush latrine) | −0.445 (−1.373, 0.484) | 0.345 | −0.446 (−1.377, 0.485) | 0.345 | ||
| Currently using unimproved sanitation* (pit latrine or open defecation) | – | – | Reference | Reference | ||
| Hygiene score | – | – | −0.032 (−0.153, 0.090) | 0.609 | −0.029 (−0.152, 0.094) | 0.639 |
| Access to services | ||||||
| Number of antenatal care visits by mother during pregnancy of the index child | ||||||
| Less than three | −0.343 (−0.810, 0.125) | 0.150 | ||||
| Three or more* | – | – | – | – | Reference | |
| Is child registered at ICDS ( | ||||||
| Yes | 0.073 (−0.935, 1.082) | 0.886 | ||||
| No* | – | – | – | – | Reference | |
Model II: Model I + WASH factors.
Model III: Model II + access to services.
INR 786 = 10.3 USD; INR 1500 = 19.5 USD. Model I: R2 = 9.5%, Adjusted R2 = 4.3%; Model II: R2 = 11.3%; Adjusted R2 = 4.2%; Model III: R2 = 10.5%; Adjusted R2 = 4.8%;
B, Beta coefficient; CI, confidence interval; p-value <0.05 is considered statistically significant (highlighted in bold).