Literature DB >> 27390156

Quantification of Task-Specific Glucose Metabolism with Constant Infusion of 18F-FDG.

Andreas Hahn1, Gregor Gryglewski1, Lukas Nics2, Marius Hienert1, Lucas Rischka1, Chrysoula Vraka2, Helen Sigurdardottir1, Thomas Vanicek1, Gregory M James1, René Seiger1, Alexander Kautzky1, Leo Silberbauer1, Wolfgang Wadsak2, Markus Mitterhauser2, Marcus Hacker2, Siegfried Kasper1, Rupert Lanzenberger3.   

Abstract

The investigation of cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRGlu) at baseline and during specific tasks previously required separate scans with the drawback of high intrasubject variability. We aimed to validate a novel approach to assessing baseline glucose metabolism and task-specific changes in a single measurement with a constant infusion of 18F-FDG.
METHODS: Fifteen healthy subjects underwent two PET measurements with arterial blood sampling. As a reference, baseline CMRGlu was quantified from a 60-min scan after 18F-FDG bolus application using the Patlak plot (eyes closed). For the other scan, a constant radioligand infusion was applied for 95 min, during which the subjects opened their eyes at 10-20 min and 60-70 min and tapped their right thumb to their fingers at 35-45 min and 85-95 min. The constant-infusion scan was quantified in two steps. First, the general linear model was used to fit regional time-activity curves with regressors for baseline metabolism, task-specific changes for the eyes-open and finger-tapping conditions, and movement parameters. Second, the Patlak plot was used for quantification of CMRGlu. Multiplication of the baseline regressor by β-values from the general linear model yielded regionally specific time-activity curves for baseline metabolism. Further, task-specific changes in metabolism are directly proportional to changes in the slope of the time-activity curve and hence to changes in CMRGlu.
RESULTS: Baseline CMRGlu from the constant-infusion scan matched that from the bolus application (test-retest variability, 1.1% ± 24.7%), which was not the case for a previously suggested approach (variability, -39.9% ± 25.2%, P < 0.001). Task-specific CMRGlu increased in the primary visual and motor cortices for eyes open and finger tapping, respectively (P < 0.05, familywise error-corrected), with absolute changes of up to 2.1 μmol/100 g/min and 6.3% relative to baseline. For eyes open, a decreased CMRGlu was observed in default-mode regions (P < 0.05, familywise error-corrected). CMRGlu quantified with venous blood samples (n = 6) showed excellent agreement with results obtained from arterial samples (r > 0.99).
CONCLUSION: Baseline glucose metabolism and task-specific changes can be quantified in a single measurement with constant infusion of 18F-FDG and venous blood sampling. The high sensitivity and regional specificity of the approach offer novel possibilities for functional and multimodal brain imaging.
© 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glucose metabolism; positron emission tomography; quantification; task

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27390156     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.176156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  21 in total

1.  The renaissance of functional 18F-FDG PET brain activation imaging.

Authors:  Antoine Verger; Eric Guedj
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  From simultaneous to synergistic MR-PET brain imaging: A review of hybrid MR-PET imaging methodologies.

Authors:  Zhaolin Chen; Sharna D Jamadar; Shenpeng Li; Francesco Sforazzini; Jakub Baran; Nicholas Ferris; Nadim Jon Shah; Gary F Egan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Imaging mitochondrial complex I activation during a vibrotactile stimulation: A PET study using [18F]BCPP-EF in the conscious monkey brain.

Authors:  Jingwan Fang; Hiroyuki Ohba; Fumio Hashimoto; Hideo Tsukada; Feiyan Chen; Huafeng Liu
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Uncoupling in intrinsic brain activity.

Authors:  Manu S Goyal; Abraham Z Snyder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Monash DaCRA fPET-fMRI: A dataset for comparison of radiotracer administration for high temporal resolution functional FDG-PET.

Authors:  Sharna D Jamadar; Emma X Liang; Shenjun Zhong; Phillip G D Ward; Alexandra Carey; Richard McIntyre; Zhaolin Chen; Gary F Egan
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 7.658

6.  NRM 2021 Abstract Booklet.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 6.960

7.  Simultaneous determination of dynamic cardiac metabolism and function using PET/MRI.

Authors:  Gregory P Barton; Lauren Vildberg; Kara Goss; Niti Aggarwal; Marlowe Eldridge; Alan B McMillan
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  MR-PET head motion correction based on co-registration of multicontrast MR images.

Authors:  Zhaolin Chen; Francesco Sforazzini; Jakub Baran; Thomas Close; Nadim Jon Shah; Gary F Egan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Dissociations between glucose metabolism and blood oxygenation in the human default mode network revealed by simultaneous PET-fMRI.

Authors:  Lars Jonasson Stiernman; Filip Grill; Andreas Hahn; Lucas Rischka; Rupert Lanzenberger; Vania Panes Lundmark; Katrine Riklund; Jan Axelsson; Anna Rieckmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Combined PET/MRI: from Status Quo to Status Go. Summary Report of the Fifth International Workshop on PET/MR Imaging; February 15-19, 2016; Tübingen, Germany.

Authors:  D L Bailey; B J Pichler; B Gückel; H Barthel; A J Beer; R Botnar; R Gillies; V Goh; M Gotthardt; R J Hicks; R Lanzenberger; C la Fougere; M Lentschig; S G Nekolla; T Niederdraenk; K Nikolaou; J Nuyts; D Olego; K Åhlström Riklund; A Signore; M Schäfers; V Sossi; M Suminski; P Veit-Haibach; L Umutlu; M Wissmeyer; T Beyer
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.