Karl Roessler1, Björn Sommer2, Andreas Merkel2, Stefan Rampp2, Stephanie Gollwitzer3, Hajo M Hamer3, Michael Buchfelder2. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Epilepsy Centre, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany. Electronic address: karl.roessler@uk-erlangen.de. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Epilepsy Centre, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany. 3. Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Centre, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Various complex techniques for depth electrode insertion in refractory epilepsy using preoperative imaging have been investigated. We evaluated a simple, accurate, cost-effective, and timesaving method using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: A neuronavigation-guided insertion tube attached to bone facilitated the placement of stereotactic percutaneous drill holes, bolt implantation, and frameless stereotactic insertion of depth electrodes. Image registration was carried out by head coil fiducials with trajectory planning and intraoperative electrode correction. RESULTS: In 6 patients with refractory epilepsy (3 women and 3 men; mean age, 30.0 years; range, 20-37 years), 58 depth electrodes (9-11 per patient) were placed. The mean length of the inserted electrodes was 37.3 mm ± 8.8 (mean ± SD) (range, 22.1-84.4 mm). The overall target point accuracy was 3.2 mm ± 2.2 (range, 0-8.6 mm), which was significantly different from the overall entry point accuracy of 1.4 mm ± 1.2 (P < 0.0001). All electrodes functioned perfectly, enabling high-quality stereo-electroencephalography recordings over a period of 7.3 days ± 0.5 (range, 7-8 days). The mean implantation time for 9-11 electrodes per patient was 115 minutes ± 36.3 (range, 75-160 minutes; 12 minutes for 1 electrode on average) including the intraoperative MRI (T1 three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo, T2, and diffusion tensor imaging). There was no hemorrhage, infection, or neurologic deficit related to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Our frameless technique of depth electrode insertion using intraoperative MRI guidance is an accurate, reliable, cost-effective, and timesaving method for stereo-electroencephalography.
OBJECTIVE: Various complex techniques for depth electrode insertion in refractory epilepsy using preoperative imaging have been investigated. We evaluated a simple, accurate, cost-effective, and timesaving method using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: A neuronavigation-guided insertion tube attached to bone facilitated the placement of stereotactic percutaneous drill holes, bolt implantation, and frameless stereotactic insertion of depth electrodes. Image registration was carried out by head coil fiducials with trajectory planning and intraoperative electrode correction. RESULTS: In 6 patients with refractory epilepsy (3 women and 3 men; mean age, 30.0 years; range, 20-37 years), 58 depth electrodes (9-11 per patient) were placed. The mean length of the inserted electrodes was 37.3 mm ± 8.8 (mean ± SD) (range, 22.1-84.4 mm). The overall target point accuracy was 3.2 mm ± 2.2 (range, 0-8.6 mm), which was significantly different from the overall entry point accuracy of 1.4 mm ± 1.2 (P < 0.0001). All electrodes functioned perfectly, enabling high-quality stereo-electroencephalography recordings over a period of 7.3 days ± 0.5 (range, 7-8 days). The mean implantation time for 9-11 electrodes per patient was 115 minutes ± 36.3 (range, 75-160 minutes; 12 minutes for 1 electrode on average) including the intraoperative MRI (T1 three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo, T2, and diffusion tensor imaging). There was no hemorrhage, infection, or neurologic deficit related to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Our frameless technique of depth electrode insertion using intraoperative MRI guidance is an accurate, reliable, cost-effective, and timesaving method for stereo-electroencephalography.
Authors: Vejay N Vakharia; Rachel Sparks; Aidan G O'Keeffe; Roman Rodionov; Anna Miserocchi; Andrew McEvoy; Sebastien Ourselin; John Duncan Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Michael C Dewan; Robert Shults; Andrew T Hale; Vishad Sukul; Dario J Englot; Peter Konrad; Hong Yu; Joseph S Neimat; William Rodriguez; Benoit M Dawant; Srivatsan Pallavaram; Robert P Naftel Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Barbara Ladisich; Lukas Machegger; Alexander Romagna; Herbert Krainz; Jürgen Steinbacher; Markus Leitinger; Gudrun Kalss; Niklas Thon; Eugen Trinka; Peter A Winkler; Christoph Schwartz Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2021-02-13 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Vejay N Vakharia; Rachel Sparks; Sjoerd B Vos; Andrew W McEvoy; Anna Miserocchi; Sebastien Ourselin; John S Duncan Journal: World Neurosurg X Date: 2019-08-05
Authors: Alejandro Granados; Roman Rodionov; Vejay Vakharia; Andrew W McEvoy; Anna Miserocchi; Aidan G O'Keeffe; John S Duncan; Rachel Sparks; Sébastien Ourselin Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2020-04-25 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Christian Dorfer; Bertil Rydenhag; Gordon Baltuch; Vivek Buch; Jeffrey Blount; Robert Bollo; Jason Gerrard; Daniel Nilsson; Karl Roessler; James Rutka; Ashwini Sharan; Dennis Spencer; Arthur Cukiert Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2020-03-29 Impact factor: 6.740