Literature DB >> 27389624

Research Registries: A Tool to Advance Understanding of Rare Neuro-Ophthalmic Diseases.

Kimberly D Blankshain1, Heather E Moss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medical research registries (MRR) are organized systems used to collect, store, and analyze patient information. They are important tools for medical research with particular application to the study of rare diseases, including those seen in neuro-ophthalmic practice. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Evidence for this review was gathered from the writers' experiences creating a comprehensive neuro-ophthalmology registry and review of the literature.
RESULTS: MRR are typically observational and prospective databases of de-identified patient information. The structure is flexible and can accommodate a focus on specific diseases or treatments, surveillance of patient populations, physician quality improvement, or recruitment for future studies. They are particularly useful for the study of rare diseases. They can be integrated into the hierarchy of medical research at many levels provided their construction is well organized and they have several key characteristics including an easily manipulated database, comprehensive information on carefully selected patients, and comply with human subjects regulations. MRR pertinent to neuro-ophthalmology include the University of Illinois at Chicago neuro-ophthalmology registry, Susac Syndrome Registry, Intracranial Hypertension Registry, and larger-scale patient outcome registries being developed by professional societies.
CONCLUSION: MRR have a variety of forms and applications. With careful planning and clear goals, they are flexible and powerful research tools that can support multiple different study designs, and this can provide the potential to advance understanding and care of neuro-ophthalmic diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27389624      PMCID: PMC4988906          DOI: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol        ISSN: 1070-8022            Impact factor:   3.042


  20 in total

1.  Contemporary rates of appropriate shock therapy in patients who receive implantable device therapy in a real-world setting: From the Israeli ICD Registry.

Authors:  Avi Sabbag; Mahmoud Suleiman; Avishag Laish-Farkash; Nimer Samania; Mark Kazatsker; Ilan Goldenberg; Michael Glikson; Roy Beinart
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  The randomized registry trial--the next disruptive technology in clinical research?

Authors:  Michael S Lauer; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Registry-based randomized clinical trials--a new clinical trial paradigm.

Authors:  Stefan James; Sunil V Rao; Christopher B Granger
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  The process of installing REDCap, a web based database supporting biomedical research: the first year.

Authors:  M Klipin; I Mare; S Hazelhurst; B Kramer
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  The National ALS Registry: a recruitment tool for research.

Authors:  Angela M Malek; David E Stickler; Vinicius C Antao; D Kevin Horton
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  Construction and management of ARDS/sepsis registry with REDCap.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Pang; Natascha Kozlowski; Sulong Wu; Mei Jiang; Yongbo Huang; Pu Mao; Xiaoqing Liu; Weiqun He; Chaoyi Huang; Yimin Li; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Weight and visual field deficits in women with idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Maureen K Baldwin; Brenna Lobb; Emanuel Tanne; Robert Egan
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  The presidential effect: the public health response to media coverage about Ronald Reagan's colon cancer episode.

Authors:  M L Brown; A L Potosky
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  1990

Review 9.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension in the USA: the role of obesity in establishing prevalence and healthcare costs.

Authors:  D Friesner; R Rosenman; B M Lobb; E Tanne
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 9.213

10.  Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer incidence trends.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; David F Penson; Julie M Legler; Dante di Tommaso; Rob Boer; Peter H Gann; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-07-03       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Influence of Patient Identification and Narrative Transportation on Intentions to Participate in Cancer Research.

Authors:  Jordan M Neil; Aisling Gough; Frank Kee; Thomas J George; Jeffrey Pufahl; Janice L Krieger
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Commentary: Rare eye diseases: More than meets the eye!

Authors:  Chaitra Jayadev; Srinivasan Sanjay
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.969

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.