Literature DB >> 27389599

[Invasive stimulation procedures and EEG diagnostics in epilepsy].

A Schulze-Bonhage1, H M Hamer2, M Hirsch3, M Hagge2.   

Abstract

Stimulation has been performed experimentally and in small case series to treat epilepsy since the 1970s. Since the introduction of vagus nerve stimulation in 1997 and intracranial stimulation methods in 2011 into patient care, invasive stimulation has become a rapidly developing but infrequently used therapeutic option in Europe. Whereas vagus nerve stimulation is frequently used, particularly in the USA, intracranial stimulation differs in its regional availability. In order to improve the efficacy of stimulation, develop criteria for its use and assure low complication rates, a concentration on experienced centers and multicenter data acquisition and sharing are needed.Invasive electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring with subdural electrodes and especially with stereotactically implanted depth electrodes have been used increasingly more often for presurgical evaluation in recent years. They are applied when non-invasive diagnostics show insufficient results to exactly identify the location and extent of the epileptogenic zone or cannot be adequately distinguished from eloquent cortex areas. Complications include intracranial hemorrhage, infections and increased intracranial pressure but lasting deficits or even death are rare (≤2 %). The outcome of invasive monitoring is inferior to non-invasive monitoring because of the higher degree of complexity of the cases; however, it is far superior to the seizure-free rates achieved by anticonvulsant drug treatment alone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drug refractory epilepsy; Epilepsy surgery; Invasive diagnostics; Neurostimulation; Treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27389599     DOI: 10.1007/s00115-016-0159-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nervenarzt        ISSN: 0028-2804            Impact factor:   1.214


  69 in total

1.  Results of treatment changes in patients with apparently drug-resistant chronic epilepsy.

Authors:  Anna L Luciano; Simon D Shorvon
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 10.422

2.  Vagus nerve stimulation: predictors of seizure freedom.

Authors:  J Janszky; M Hoppe; F Behne; I Tuxhorn; H W Pannek; A Ebner
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Morbidity associated with the use of intracranial electrodes for epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  Jorge G Burneo; David A Steven; Richard S McLachlan; Andrew G Parrent
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 4.  Therapeutic devices for epilepsy.

Authors:  Robert S Fisher
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Extent of neocortical resection and surgical outcome of epilepsy: intracranial EEG analysis.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim; Hyun Kyung Kim; Sang Kun Lee; Kon Chu; Chun Kee Chung
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 5.864

6.  Risks and benefits of invasive epilepsy surgery workup with implanted subdural and depth electrodes.

Authors:  Jörg Wellmer; Ferdinand von der Groeben; Ute Klarmann; Christian Weber; Christian E Elger; Horst Urbach; Hans Clusmann; Marec von Lehe
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 5.864

7.  High-frequency electroencephalographic oscillations correlate with outcome of epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  Julia Jacobs; Maeike Zijlmans; Rina Zelmann; Claude-Edouard Chatillon; Jeffrey Hall; André Olivier; François Dubeau; Jean Gotman
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 10.422

8.  Responders to vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in refractory epilepsy have reduced interictal cortical synchronicity on scalp EEG.

Authors:  Clémentine Bodin; Sandrine Aubert; Géraldine Daquin; Romain Carron; Didier Scavarda; Aileen McGonigal; Fabrice Bartolomei
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.045

Review 9.  An institutional experience with cervical vagus nerve trunk stimulation for medically refractory epilepsy: rationale, technique, and outcome.

Authors:  A P Amar; C N Heck; M L Levy; T Smith; C M DeGiorgio; S Oviedo; M L Apuzzo
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial (cMPsE02).

Authors:  S Bauer; H Baier; C Baumgartner; K Bohlmann; S Fauser; W Graf; B Hillenbrand; M Hirsch; C Last; H Lerche; T Mayer; A Schulze-Bonhage; B J Steinhoff; Y Weber; A Hartlep; F Rosenow; H M Hamer
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 8.955

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Deep brain and cortical stimulation for epilepsy.

Authors:  Mathieu Sprengers; Kristl Vonck; Evelien Carrette; Anthony G Marson; Paul Boon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.