| Literature DB >> 27387324 |
Jiao Xue1, Lan Wang1, Lin Zhang1, Srinivasan Balamurugan1, Da-Wei Li1, Hao Zeng1, Wei-Dong Yang1, Jie-Sheng Liu1, Hong-Ye Li2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The fast growing photosynthetic microalgae have been widely used in aquaculture, food, health, and biofuels. Recent findings in the diatom has proposed a pivotal role of NADP-malic enzyme in generation of NADPH as an important supply of reducing power for fatty acid biosynthesis. To test the lipogenic malic enzyme for fatty acid synthesis in green algae, here the malic enzyme gene PtME from the oleaginous diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum was expressed in a representative green microalga Chlorella pyrenoidosa.Entities:
Keywords: Biofuel; Chlorella; Lipid accumulation; Malic enzyme
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27387324 PMCID: PMC4936009 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-016-0519-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Fig. 1Sequence alignment of PtME with representative species based on BLAST. a Amino acid sequences of various species were analyzed with software MEGA5. Mci Mucor circinelloides, Nta Nicotiana tabacum, Ptr Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Ssc Sus scrofa. b The conserved domain “NAD_bind_1_malic_enz” indicates the “NAD(P) binding domain of malic enzyme (ME)”, and the conserved domain “malic” indicates the “Malic enzyme, N-terminal domain”
Fig. 2Expression of PtME in C. pyrenoidosa. a Single PCR analysis. Lane 1–4 transformed algae; 5–8: wild type. a 1.68-kb band was detected in lanes 1–4 (transformed lines); while no such band was detected in lanes 5–8 (wild type). b Expression of PtME transcripts measured by qPCR; β-actin was used as internal reference gene. Significant difference between control and treatment groups is indicated at P < 0.05 (*) or P < 0.01 (**) level. Each value represents mean ± SD (n = 3). c PtME protein expression detected by western blotting with an anti-Flag antibody; beta-actin was used as internal reference protein. d Enzymatic activity of ME in transformed and wild type cells. **indicates a significant difference between wild type and engineered microalgae (P < 0.01)
Fig. 3Photosynthesis performance and growth curve of C. pyrenoidosa. a Fv/Fm showing photosynthesis activity; b growth curves of engineered and wild type microalgae. Significant difference between control and treatment groups is indicated at P < 0.05 (*) or P < 0.01 (**) level. Each value represents mean ± SD (n = 3)
Fig. 4Lipid productivity in C. pyrenoidosa. a Neutral lipid content as per 106 cells determined by Nile red staining. b Neutral lipid content as per culture volume. c Neutral lipid content under N-deprivation. Significant difference between control and treatment groups is indicated at P < 0.05 (*) or P < 0.01 (**) level. Each value represents mean ± SD (n = 3)
Fig. 5Morphology of microalgal cells and oil bodies. Microalgal cells were stained with Nile red and photographed under a laser-scanning confocal microscope. a wild type; b, c engineered cell lines ME-1 and ME-2. Bar 2 µm
Fatty acid compositions (%) of C. pyrenoidosa cells
| Composition | Wild type | ME-1 | ME-2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| C14:0 | 0.3 ± 0.03 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 0.21 ± 0.01 |
| C15:0 | 0.37 ± 0.04 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.03 |
| C16:0 | 23.97 ± 2.46 | 19.2 ± 0.42 | 21.49 ± 1.15 |
| C17:0 | 0.59 ± 0.11 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.01 |
| C18:0 | 8.36 ± 1.69 | 2.95 ± 0.25 | 4.21 ± 0.19 |
| SUM SFAs | 33.59 ± 4.83 | 22.59 ± 0.71 | 26.2 ± 1.39 |
| C16:1 | 0.42 ± 0.07 | 2.4 ± 0.23 | 2.54 ± 0.39 |
| C18:1 | 1.18 ± 0.13 | 1.17 ± 0.37 | 1.15 ± 0.18 |
| SUM MUFAs | 1.6 ± 0.20 | 3.57 ± 0.60 | 3.69 ± 0.57 |
| C16:2 | 1.89 ± 0.48 | 0.39 ± 0.04 | 0.04 ± 0.01 |
| C16:3 | 8.24 ± 0.02 | 13.88 ± 0.52 | 13.88 ± 0.61 |
| C18:2 | 12.29 ± 3.35 | 14.08 ± 1.43 | 12.85 ± 2.78 |
| C18:3 | 18.9 ± 0.26 | 27.01 ± 2.69 | 26.27 ± 1.82 |
| SUM PUFAs | 41.32 ± 4.11 | 55.36 ± 5.68 | 53.04 ± 5.22 |