Literature DB >> 27387228

A potato model intercomparison across varying climates and productivity levels.

David H Fleisher1, Bruno Condori1, Roberto Quiroz2, Ashok Alva3, Senthold Asseng4, Carolina Barreda2, Marco Bindi5, Kenneth J Boote4, Roberto Ferrise5, Angelinus C Franke6, Panamanna M Govindakrishnan7, Dieudonne Harahagazwe8, Gerrit Hoogenboom4, Soora Naresh Kumar9, Paolo Merante5, Claas Nendel10, Jorgen E Olesen11, Phillip S Parker10, Dirk Raes12, Rubi Raymundo4, Alex C Ruane13, Claudio Stockle14, Iwan Supit15, Eline Vanuytrecht12, Joost Wolf16, Prem Woli17.   

Abstract

A potato crop multimodel assessment was conducted to quantify variation among models and evaluate responses to climate change. Nine modeling groups simulated agronomic and climatic responses at low-input (Chinoli, Bolivia and Gisozi, Burundi)- and high-input (Jyndevad, Denmark and Washington, United States) management sites. Two calibration stages were explored, partial (P1), where experimental dry matter data were not provided, and full (P2). The median model ensemble response outperformed any single model in terms of replicating observed yield across all locations. Uncertainty in simulated yield decreased from 38% to 20% between P1 and P2. Model uncertainty increased with interannual variability, and predictions for all agronomic variables were significantly different from one model to another (P < 0.001). Uncertainty averaged 15% higher for low- vs. high-input sites, with larger differences observed for evapotranspiration (ET), nitrogen uptake, and water use efficiency as compared to dry matter. A minimum of five partial, or three full, calibrated models was required for an ensemble approach to keep variability below that of common field variation. Model variation was not influenced by change in carbon dioxide (C), but increased as much as 41% and 23% for yield and ET, respectively, as temperature (T) or rainfall (W) moved away from historical levels. Increases in T accounted for the highest amount of uncertainty, suggesting that methods and parameters for T sensitivity represent a considerable unknown among models. Using median model ensemble values, yield increased on average 6% per 100-ppm C, declined 4.6% per °C, and declined 2% for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites). Differences in predictions due to model representation of light utilization were significant (P < 0.01). These are the first reported results quantifying uncertainty for tuber/root crops and suggest modeling assessments of climate change impact on potato may be improved using an ensemble approach.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate change; crop modeling; model improvement; solanum tuberosum; uncertainty analysis; yield sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27387228     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  13 in total

1.  Earth observations and integrative models in support of food and water security.

Authors:  Stephanie Schollaert Uz; Alex C Ruane; Bryan N Duncan; Compton J Tucker; George J Huffman; Iliana E Mladenova; Batu Osmanoglu; Thomas R H Holmes; Amy McNally; Christa Peters-Lidard; John D Bolten; Narendra Das; Matthew Rodell; Sean McCartney; Martha C Anderson; Brad Doorn
Journal:  Remote Sens Earth Syst Sci       Date:  2019-03-15

2.  Impact of choice of future climate change projection on growth chamber experimental outcomes: a preliminary study in potato.

Authors:  Courtney P Leisner; Joshua C Wood; Brieanne Vaillancourt; Ying Tang; Dave S Douches; C Robin Buell; Julie A Winkler
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Sensitivity and requirement of improvements of four soybean crop simulation models for climate change studies in Southern Brazil.

Authors:  R Battisti; P C Sentelhas; K J Boote
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  Coordinating AgMIP data and models across global and regional scales for 1.5°C and 2.0°C assessments.

Authors:  Cynthia Rosenzweig; Alex C Ruane; John Antle; Joshua Elliott; Muhammad Ashfaq; Ashfaq Ahmad Chatta; Frank Ewert; Christian Folberth; Ibrahima Hathie; Petr Havlik; Gerrit Hoogenboom; Hermann Lotze-Campen; Dilys S MacCarthy; Daniel Mason-D'Croz; Erik Mencos Contreras; Christoph Müller; Ignacio Perez-Dominguez; Meridel Phillips; Cheryl Porter; Rubi M Raymundo; Ronald D Sands; Carl-Friedrich Schleussner; Roberto O Valdivia; Hugo Valin; Keith Wiebe
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Role of Tuber Developmental Processes in Response of Potato to High Temperature and Elevated CO2.

Authors:  Chien-Teh Chen; Tim L Setter
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26

6.  Improving the use of crop models for risk assessment and climate change adaptation.

Authors:  Andrew J Challinor; Christoph Müller; Senthold Asseng; Chetan Deva; Kathryn Jane Nicklin; Daniel Wallach; Eline Vanuytrecht; Stephen Whitfield; Julian Ramirez-Villegas; Ann-Kristin Koehler
Journal:  Agric Syst       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.370

Review 7.  Can Crop Models Identify Critical Gaps in Genetics, Environment, and Management Interactions?

Authors:  Claudio O Stöckle; Armen R Kemanian
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 8.  Photosynthesis in a Changing Global Climate: Scaling Up and Scaling Down in Crops.

Authors:  Marouane Baslam; Toshiaki Mitsui; Michael Hodges; Eckart Priesack; Matthew T Herritt; Iker Aranjuelo; Álvaro Sanz-Sáez
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 9.  Applications of New Breeding Technologies for Potato Improvement.

Authors:  Amir Hameed; Syed Shan-E-Ali Zaidi; Sara Shakir; Shahid Mansoor
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  A regional nuclear conflict would compromise global food security.

Authors:  Jonas Jägermeyr; Alan Robock; Joshua Elliott; Christoph Müller; Lili Xia; Nikolay Khabarov; Christian Folberth; Erwin Schmid; Wenfeng Liu; Florian Zabel; Sam S Rabin; Michael J Puma; Alison Heslin; James Franke; Ian Foster; Senthold Asseng; Charles G Bardeen; Owen B Toon; Cynthia Rosenzweig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.