| Literature DB >> 27386333 |
Xiaoyi Cui1, Mayumi Ohtsu1, Nathan Mise1, Akihiko Ikegami1, Atsuko Mizuno2, Takako Sakamoto1, Masanori Ogawa1, Munehito Machida1, Fujio Kayama3.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the relationships between oxidative stress and heavy metal exposure (lead [Pb] and cadmium [Cd]), as well as co-factors such as physical activity and age, in Japanese women. This study was conducted with female subjects from a rural agricultural community in Japan. Subjects were asked to complete lifestyle-related questionnaires and undergo a group health examination. Physical activity, alcohol consumption, body mass index, and other demographic information were collected. Blood and urine samples were collected to measure urinary 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) levels and blood and urinary Cd and Pb concentrations. Urine samples were analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography and flameless atomic absorption spectrometry; blood samples were analyzed using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Age, physical activity, and blood and urinary Cd and Pb concentrations were included in structural equation modeling analysis. Two latent factors for heavy metal exposure and physical activity were produced to predict the total influence of the variables. The final model was good: CMIN/DF = 0.775, CFI = 1.000, GFI = 0.975, AGFI = 0.954, RMSEA = 0.000. 8-OHdG levels were positively associated with heavy metal exposure, physical activity, and age (standard β of path analysis: 0.33, 0.38, and 0.20, respectively). Therefore, oxidative stress is associated with both, environmental and lifestyle factors, in combination with aging.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Cadmium; Japanese female population; Lead; Oxidative stress; Physical activity
Year: 2016 PMID: 27386333 PMCID: PMC4920733 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2430-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Characteristics of and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) levels in female subjects
| Variables | 8-OHdG (ng/mg Cr) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | Median (min–max) | pa | |
| Age (years) | |||
| <50 | 39 (20.7 %) | 3.30 (1.11–14.80) | |
| 50–59 | 72 (38.3 %) | 5.03 (1.48–18.21) | |
| ≥60 | 77 (41.0 %) | 6.56 (1.41–14.41) | 0.00a |
| BMI (kg/m2) | |||
| <18.5 | 3 (1.6 %) | 8.15 (3.07–9.88) | |
| 18.5–24.9 | 121 (64.4 %) | 5.33 (1.11–14.80) | |
| ≥25 | 64 (34.0 %) | 5.01 (1.48–18.21) | 0.73a |
| Smoking status | |||
| Smoker | 5 (2.7 %) | 5.09 (1.64–14.80) | |
| Non-smoker | 183 (97.3 %) | 5.26 (1.11–18.21) | 0.76b |
| Alcohol consumption status | |||
| Alcohol consumption | 76 (40.4 %) | 5.12 (1.41–11.39) | |
| No alcohol consumption | 110 (58.5 %) | 5.36 (1.11–18.21) | |
| Previous alcohol consumption | 2 (1.1 %) | 4.84 (4.33–5.36) | 0.39a |
| Total | 188 (100 %) | 5.25 (1.11–18.21) | |
aMedian 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) values were compared between age (<50, 50–59, ≥60 years), body mass index (BMI) (<18.5, 18.5–24.9, ≥25 kg/m2), and alcohol consumption (alcohol consumption, no alcohol consumption, previous alcohol consumption) groups using Kruskal–Wallis tests
bMedian 8-OHdG values were compared between the smoking status (smoker and non-smoker) groups using Mann–Whitney tests
Comparison of variables by quartiles of urinary 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and correlations of the variables with 8-OHdG levels
| Variables | Quartiles of 8-OHdG values | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤25th percentile | 26–50th percentiles | 51–75th percentiles | >75th percentile | Total | p | Rc | |
| ≤3.68 (n = 47) | 3.68–5.25 (n = 47) | 5.25–7.47 (n = 47) | >7.47 (n = 47) | (n = 188) | |||
| Mean (SD), GM (GSD), or median (min–max) | Mean (SD), GM (GSD), or median (min–max) | Mean (SD), GM (GSD), or median (min–max) | Mean (SD), GM (GSD), or median (min–max) | Mean (SD), GM (GSD), or median (min–max) | |||
| Age (years)f | 50 (39–72) | 56 (35–75) | 62 (38–77) | 63 (47–73)△ | 57 (35–77) | 0.00b | 0.35* |
| BMI (kg/m2)d | 23.70 (2.72) | 24.03 (3.14) | 24.18 (2.93) | 23.60 (2.97) | 23.88 (2.93) | 0.75a | 0.02 |
| Blood lead (μg/L)e | 13.43 (1.04) | 14.02 (1.05) | 14.18 (1.04) | 16.19 (1.06)△ | 14.42 (1.02) | 0.04a | 0.18* |
| Urinary lead (μg/g Cr)e | 1.06 (1.08) | 1.01 (1.06) | 1.11 (1.05) | 1.32 (1.08)☆ | 1.12 (1.04) | 0.03a | 0.20* |
| Blood cadmium (μg/L)e | 2.06 (1.08) | 1.94 (1.07) | 2.09 (1.06) | 1.87 (1.06) | 1.99 (1.03) | 0.58a | −0.08 |
| Urinary cadmium (μg/g Cr)e | 3.27 (1.08) | 2.99 (1.09) | 3.90 (1.06) | 4.00 (1.07)☆△ | 3.51 (1.04) | 0.01a | 0.22* |
| Physical activity (min/week)f | |||||||
| Voluntary exercise | |||||||
| Moderate exercise | 0 (0–480) | 0 (0–900) | 0 (0–960) | 0 (0–1440) | 0 (0–1440) | 0.85b | 0.02 |
| Vigorous exercise | 0 (0–120) | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–360) | 0 (0–630) | 0 (0–630) | 0.09b | 0.15* |
| Resistance training | 0 (0–120) | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–240) | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–240) | 0.14b | −0.07 |
| Bicycle riding or walking | 0 (0–800) | 70 (0–500) | 0 (0–1800) | 120 (0–700)◇△ | 40 (0–1800) | 0.01b | 0.19* |
| General everyday activities | |||||||
| Meals | 420 (200–1050) | 430 (0–1100) | 450 (70–1260) | 420 (180–1800) | 420 (0–1800) | 0.72b | −0.05 |
| Watching TV or reading | 1050 (70–5400) | 1050 (150–2940) | 840 (70–5400) | 1380 (100–7200)◇ | 1050 (70–7200) | 0.11b | 0.12 |
| Driving an automobile | 260 (0–4480) | 210 (0–3000) | 200 (0–1000) | 200 (0–5400)☆△ | 210 (0 | 0.01b | −0.24* |
| Interesting activities at home | 1050 (70–3780) | 1050 (0–6000) | 840 (0–2800) | 1200 (0–4200) | 1050 (0 | 0.41b | −0.05 |
| Activity at work | |||||||
| Desk work | 60 (0–4100) | 300 (0–2940) | 0 (0–3960) | 140 (0–7200) | 60 (0 | 0.15b | −0.05 |
| Strenuous housework | 140 (0–1200) | 105 (0–840) | 60 (0–630) | 150 (0–3600)◇ | 120 (0 | 0.06b | 0.01 |
| Active work | 60 (0–3360) | 120 (0–2520) | 0 (0–3360) | 180 (0–2520) | 75 (0 | 0.83b | −0.01 |
| Carpentry work | 0 (0–240) | 0 (0–540) | 0 (0–300) | 0 (0–210) | 0 (0 | 0.48b | −0.10 |
* p < 0.05 based on the Spearman’s rank correlation analysis
◇ p < 0.05 for the comparisons of the mean and GM using Student’s t test or the median using Mann–Whitney U tests between the >75th and 51–75th percentile categories
☆ p < 0.05 for the comparisons of the mean and GM using Student’s t test or the median using Mann–Whitney U tests between the >75th and 26–50th percentile categories
△ p < 0.05 for the comparisons of the mean and GM using Student’s t test or the median using Mann–Whitney U tests between the >75th and ≤25th percentile categories
aMean body mass index (BMI) and the geometric mean (GM) of the heavy metal exposure variables were compared between the 4 quartile categories of 8-OHdG using ANOVA tests
bMedian age and physical activity were compared between the 4 quartile groups of 8-OHdG using Kruskal–Wallis tests
cSpearman’s rank correlation coefficient between 8-OHdG and each variable
dResults shown as mean (standard deviation [SD])
eResults shown as GM (geometric standard deviation [GSD])
fResults shown as median (min–max)
Standardized regression coefficients of the variables used in the structural equation modeling to determine associations between heavy metal exposure, physical activity, age and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) levels (N = 188)
| Dependent variable | Independent variable | Standard | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-OHdG (measured variable) | Heavy metal exposure | 0.33 | –a |
| Physical activity | 0.38 | –a | |
| Age | 0.20 | 0.00 | |
| Heavy metal exposure (latent variable) | Urinary cadmium | 0.53 | 0.01 |
| Blood cadmium | −0.53 | 0.01 | |
| Urinary lead | −0.02 | 0.94 | |
| Blood lead | 0.80 | 0.00 | |
| Physical activity (latent variable) | Vigorous exercise | 0.40 | 0.02 |
| Bicycle riding or walking | −0.09 | 0.60 | |
| Watching TV or reading | 0.82 | 0.00 | |
| Driving an automobile | −0.27 | 0.13 | |
| Strenuous housework | 0.37 | 0.02 |
ap values could not be calculated because the independent variable was a latent variable
Fig. 1Results of the structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis. The standard β analysis result produced by Amos: the standard β from Heavy metal exposure, Physical activity, and Age for 8-OHdG are 0.33, 0.38, and 0.20, respectively. The model fit test result produced by Amos: CMIN/DF (Chi square/degree of freedom ratio) = 0.775, CMIN/DF ratio values <2 are widely considered to represent a minimally plausible model; CFI (comparative fix index) = 1.000, close to 1 indicates a very good fit; GFI (Goodness of Fit Index) = 0.975, GFI > 0.95 indicates a good fit; AGFI (adjusted GFI) = 0.954, AGFI > 0.9 indicates a good fit; RMSEA (root mean square error of approximation) = 0.000, there is good model fit if RMSEA is ≤0.05