| Literature DB >> 27386134 |
Malika El Ouaaliti1, Rong Li1, Delphine Gobin1, Dominique Bron2, Brigitte Cantinieaux1.
Abstract
We report a rare case of type 2M von Willebrand disease diagnosed in an elderly multiple myeloma patient who had no personal and family bleeding history. This case report emphasis the importance to not systematically exclude a congenital vWD in adult patients when coagulation screening tests indicate toward a vWD.Entities:
Keywords: 1‐desamino‐8‐d‐arginine vasopressin; congenital von Willebrand disease; multiple myeloma; preoperative screening; prolonged apTT; von Willebrand factor
Year: 2016 PMID: 27386134 PMCID: PMC4929811 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.603
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Case Rep ISSN: 2050-0904
Assessment tests were performed prior to the patient surgery for osteonecrosis of the jaw. First, aPTT, PT, and fibrinogen measurements were done (1st)
| Assessment results | 1st | 2nd | Months after surgery | Normal range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLT (* 103/ | 233 * 103 | 192 * 103 | 150–440 | |
| PT (%) | 103.6 | 101.4 | 33 | >70 |
| INR | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.97 | 0.95–1.31 |
| Fibrinogen (mg/dL) | 434 | 445 | 200–400 | |
| aPTT (s) | 34.6 | 34.1 | 46.2 | 21.7–33.9 |
| TT (s) | 18.0 | 16.1 | 16.2–20.7 | |
| Actin® FS (s) | Prolonged | 21.3–31.1 | ||
| Mixing (s) | Normal | 21.7–33.9 | ||
| FVIII (%) | 43.6 | 48.5 | 67.1 | 50–200 |
| vWF:Ag (%) | 19 | 20 | 29 | 50–200 |
| vWF:RCo (%) | 11 | 13 | 17.7 | 50–200 |
| vWF:RCo/vWF:Ag | 0.58 | 0.65 | 0.61 | 0.7 |
| FVIII/vWF:Ag | 2.29 | 2.43 | 2.31 | 1.0 |
| RIPA (Ristocetin 0.3 ml ml−1) (%) | <10 | <10 | ||
| Collagen‐binding Assay (I and III) (%) | 39 | 50–160 | ||
| vWF:CB/vWF:Ag | 2.05 | 0.7 | ||
| Multimer analysis | Normal | Detection of a triple structure | ||
| Molecular analysis (PCR) | Heterozygous mutation p.R1315C/c.3943C>T in exon 28 of the vWF gene (A1 domain) | No mutation |
As aPTT results were perturbed, TT, Actin® FS and mixing analyses were undertaken. Consequent to a prolonged Actin® FS result and corrected mixing study, FVIII, vWF:Ag, and vWF:RCo were evaluated. As the later values obtained were low, vWD was suspected and supplementary tests were done. Samples were sent to UZAntwerpen laboratory for collagen‐binding assay, multimer, and molecular analysis. Three days later, low levels of FVIII, vWF:Ag, and vWF:RCo were confirmed on a second sample (2nd). Eight months later, when IgA‐Kappa level was confirmed as stable, aPTT, FVIII, vWF:Ag, and vWF:RCo were evaluated to confirm the initial results obtained during the preoperative assessment tests. aPTT (Synthasil, IL), PT (Innovin, Siemens), fibrinogen, TT, Actin® FS (rich is PL), FVIII, vWF:Ag, and vWF:RCo dosage were performed using CS5000 or CS2100 (Sysmex). Finally, RIPA was also performed using Chrono‐log Aggregometer.
Platelets (PLT); prothrombin time (PT); activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT); thrombin time (TT); vWF antigen (vWF:Ag); ristocetin cofactor activity (vWF:RCo); ristocetin‐induced platelet aggregation (RIPA).
Figure 1Left side of the graph: FVIII, vWF:Ag, and vWF:Rco were evaluated prior to (t = 0 min) and 30, 90 min after DDAVP administration. As the patient did not respond sufficiently, recombinant vWF was administrated prior to surgery. Right side of the graph: FVIII, vWF:Ag, and vWF:Rco were evaluated prior to recombinant vWF administration and prior surgery (t = 0'), post recombinant vWF administration and prior surgery (prior surgery), and post recombinant vWF administration and postsurgery (post surgery). There was no hemorrhagic incidence during peri‐ and postoperation with tranexamic acid. vWF:Ag and vWF:Rco values are situated above the graph. activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT); vWF antigen (vWF:Ag); ristocetin cofactor activity (vWF:RCo), recombinant vWF (rvWF).