Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Let's make peer review scientific.

Literature DB >> 27383970

Let's make peer review scientific.

Drummond Rennie¹.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2016 PMID： 27383970 DOI： 10.1038/535031a

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nature ISSN： 0028-0836 Impact factor: 49.962

× No keyword cloud information.

9 in total

1. Publication bias in editorial decision making.

Authors: Carin M Olson; Drummond Rennie; Deborah Cook; Kay Dickersin; Annette Flanagin; Joseph W Hogan; Qi Zhu; Jennifer Reiling; Brian Pace
Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-06-05 Impact factor: 56.272

2. Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes.

Authors: Trish Groves
Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-11-16

3. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators.

Authors: A C Justice; M K Cho; M A Winker; J A Berlin; D Rennie
Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-07-15 Impact factor: 56.272

4. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.

Authors: C Begg; M Cho; S Eastwood; R Horton; D Moher; I Olkin; R Pitkin; D Rennie; K F Schulz; D Simel; D F Stroup
Journal: JAMA Date: 1996-08-28 Impact factor: 56.272

5. Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping.

Authors: Kyle Siler; Kirby Lee; Lisa Bero
Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-12-22 Impact factor: 11.205

6. Guarding the guardians: a conference on editorial peer review.

Authors: D Rennie
Journal: JAMA Date: 1986-11-07 Impact factor: 56.272

7. The need for a research agenda.

Authors: J C Bailar; K Patterson
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1985-03-07 Impact factor: 91.245

8. Reporting randomized controlled trials. An experiment and a call for responses from readers.

Authors: D Rennie
Journal: JAMA Date: 1995-04-05 Impact factor: 56.272

9. Registering clinical trials.

Authors: Kay Dickersin; Drummond Rennie
Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-07-23 Impact factor: 56.272

9 in total

22 in total

1. The Participation and Motivations of Grant Peer Reviewers: A Comprehensive Survey.

Authors: Stephen A Gallo; Lisa A Thompson; Karen B Schmaling; Scott R Glisson
Journal: Sci Eng Ethics Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2. Increasing engagement in peer review.

Authors: Nancy L Keating; Supriya G Mohile
Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 3.599

3. The "new realities" of peer review.

Authors: Bill J Yates
Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4. A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review.

Authors: Jonathan P Tennant; Jonathan M Dugan; Daniel Graziotin; Damien C Jacques; François Waldner; Daniel Mietchen; Yehia Elkhatib; Lauren B Collister; Christina K Pikas; Tom Crick; Paola Masuzzo; Anthony Caravaggi; Devin R Berg; Kyle E Niemeyer; Tony Ross-Hellauer; Sara Mannheimer; Lillian Rigling; Daniel S Katz; Bastian Greshake Tzovaras; Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza; Nazeefa Fatima; Marta Poblet; Marios Isaakidis; Dasapta Erwin Irawan; Sébastien Renaut; Christopher R Madan; Lisa Matthias; Jesper Nørgaard Kjær; Daniel Paul O'Donnell; Cameron Neylon; Sarah Kearns; Manojkumar Selvaraju; Julien Colomb
Journal: F1000Res Date: 2017-07-20