Literature DB >> 12876095

Registering clinical trials.

Kay Dickersin1, Drummond Rennie.   

Abstract

That it is not possible to find information about all initiated clinical trials is of international concern. This is a particular worry because scientists tend to publish their positive findings more often than their negative findings (publication bias). A comprehensive register of initiated clinical trials, with each trial assigned a unique identifier, would inform reviewers, physicians, and others (eg, consumers) about which trials had been started and directly address the problem of publication bias. Patients and their clinicians could also know which trials are open for enrollment, thus speeding medical advances. Individuals who participate in clinical trials typically provide consent in the belief that they are contributing to medical knowledge. But if the knowledge gained is never reported, the trust between patients and investigators and that between patients and research ethics review boards are both damaged. Ethical issues are of particular concern if industry is gaining financially from public involvement in trials, but refusing to reciprocate by making information from industry-sponsored trials generally available. All stakeholders-investigators, research organizations and institutions, journal editors, lawmakers, consumers, and others-must act now, together and in their own domains, to ensure comprehensive registration of clinical trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12876095     DOI: 10.1001/jama.290.4.516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  106 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trials: what gets published, and when?

Authors:  Laurence Hirsch
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Registering CIHR-funded randomized controlled trials: a global public good.

Authors:  David Moher; Alan Bernstein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Recognizing, investigating and dealing with incomplete and biased reporting of clinical research: from Francis Bacon to the WHO.

Authors:  Kay Dickersin; Iain Chalmers
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

Authors:  David Moher; Sally Hopewell; Kenneth F Schulz; Victor Montori; Peter C Gøtzsche; P J Devereaux; Diana Elbourne; Matthias Egger; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-23

5.  Clinical trials report. Reading alphabet soup.

Authors:  Alan B Weder
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 6.  Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1).

Authors:  Karmela Krleza-Jerić; An-Wen Chan; Kay Dickersin; Ida Sim; Jeremy Grimshaw; Christian Gluud
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-23

Review 7.  Sikh birth customs.

Authors:  R Gatrad; J Jhutti-Johal; P S Gill; A Sheikh
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 8.  Should paediatricians support the European Paediatric Clinical Trials Register?

Authors:  H M Sammons; C Naylor; I Choonara; C Pandolfini; M Bonati
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Trial Registration at ClinicalTrials.gov between May and October 2005.

Authors:  Deborah A Zarin; Tony Tse; Nicholas C Ide
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Peer-reviewed publication of clinical trials completed for pediatric exclusivity.

Authors:  Daniel K Benjamin; Philip Brian Smith; M Dianne Murphy; Rosemary Roberts; Lisa Mathis; Debbie Avant; Robert M Califf; Jennifer S Li
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.