| Literature DB >> 27383804 |
Y M Choi1,2, S Hwang2,3, K Lee2.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the growth performance, fiber characteristics of the pectoralis major muscle, and meat quality characteristics in the heavy weight (HW) and random bred control (RBC) quail lines and genders. The HW male exhibited more than two times greater body (245.7 vs 96.1 g, p<0.05) and pectoralis major muscle (PMW; 37.1 vs 11.1 g, p<0.05) weights compared to the RBC female. This growth performance in the HW line was associated with a greater muscle fiber area (1,502 vs 663.0 μm(2), p<0.001) compared to the RBC line. Greater muscle mass of the HW male was accompanied by a higher percentage of type IIB fiber compared to the HW female (64.0% vs 51.0%, p<0.05). However, muscle fiber hyperplasia (increase in fiber number) has had a somewhat limited effect on PMW between the two lines. On the other hand, the HW line harboring a higher proportion of type IIB fiber showed rapid pH decline at the early postmortem period (6.23 vs 6.41, p<0.05) and lighter meat surface (53.5 vs 47.3, p<0.05) compared to the RBC line harboring a lower proportion of type IIB fiber. There were no significant differences observed in the measurement of water-holding capacity including drip loss (2.74% vs 3.07%, p>0.05) and cooking loss (21.9% vs 20.4%, p>0.05) between the HW and RBC lines. Therefore, the HW quail line developed by selection from the RBC quail, was slightly different in the meat quality characteristics compared to the RBC line, and a marked difference was found in growth performance between the two quail lines.Entities:
Keywords: Growth Performance; Heavy Weight Quail; Meat Quality; Muscle Fiber Characteristics
Year: 2016 PMID: 27383804 PMCID: PMC5003995 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.16.0329
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Body weight and pectoralis major (PM) muscle characteristics of the different quail lines and sex
| Quail line (Q) | RBC | HW | Level of significance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Sex (S) | Male ( | Female ( | Male ( | Female ( | Q | S | Q×S |
| Body weight (BW, g) | 108.2 | 96.1 | 245.7 | 234.1 | NS | NS | |
| PM muscle weight (PMW, g) | 12.2 | 11.1 | 37.1 | 33.6 | NS | NS | |
| PMW/BW (%) | 11.4 | 11.5 | 15.2 | 14.1 | NS | NS | |
| PM muscle area (mm2) | 319.7 | 277.4 | 656.0 | 553.9 | NS | NS | |
RBC, random bred control; HW, heavy weight; NS, not significant.
Standard error of least square means.
Different superscripts in the same row represent significant differences (p<0.05).
p<0.001.
Muscle fiber characteristics of the pectoralis major muscle on the different quail lines and sex
| Quail line (Q) | RBC | HW | Level of significance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Sex (S) | Male | Female | Male | Female | Q | S | Q×S |
| Fiber area (μm2) | |||||||
| Mean | 704.0 | 622.1 | 1,570 | 1,435 | NS | NS | |
| Type IIA fiber | 432.6 | 425.1 | 872.4 | 860.3 | NS | NS | |
| Type IIB fiber | 1,679 (225.4) | 1,506 (195.2) | 1,995 (225.4) | 2,006 (195.4) | NS | NS | NS |
| Total fiber number (×1,000) | 493.2 (53.2) | 513.8 (46.1) | 439.2 (53.2) | 523.8 (46.1) | NS | NS | NS |
| Fiber area percentage (%) | |||||||
| Type IIA fiber | 47.4 | 57.3 | 19.4 | 29.1 | NS | ||
| Type IIB fiber | 52.7 | 42.7 | 80.6 | 70.9 | NS | ||
| Fiber number percentage (%) | |||||||
| Type IIA fiber | 78.0 | 81.0 | 36.0 | 49.0 | NS | ||
| Type IIB fiber | 22.0 | 19.0 | 64.0 | 51.0 | NS | ||
RBC, random bred control; HW, heavy weight; NS, not significant.
Standard error of least square means.
Different superscripts in the same row represent significant differences (p<0.05).
p<0.05;
p<0.001.
Meat quality characteristics of the pectoralis major muscle on the different quail lines and sex
| Quail line (Q) | RBC | HW | Level of significance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Sex (S) | Male | Female | Male | Female | Q | S | Q×S |
| Postmortem glycolytic rate | |||||||
| Muscle pH15 min | 6.40 | 6.41 | 6.16 | 6.29 | NS | NS | |
| Muscle pH24 h | 5.51 (0.04) | 5.56 (0.05) | 5.45 (0.04) | 5.49 (0.05) | NS | NS | NS |
| Meat color | |||||||
| Lightness ( | 48.8 | 45.8 | 54.1 | 53.0 | NS | NS | |
| Redness ( | 5.96 | 5.88 | 5.42 | 5.46 | NS | NS | |
| Yellowness ( | 12.9 (1.13) | 12.7 (1.30) | 12.3 (1.13) | 12.6 (1.30) | NS | NS | NS |
| Water-holding capacity | |||||||
| Drip loss (%) | 2.92 (0.37) | 3.21 (0.43) | 2.03 (0.37) | 3.45 (0.43) | NS | NS | NS |
| Cooking loss (%) | 19.5 (1.19) | 21.3 (1.27) | 21.0 (1.19) | 22.9 (1.27) | NS | NS | NS |
RBC, random bred control; HW, heavy weight; NS, not significant.
Standard error of least square means.
Different superscripts in the same row represent significant differences (p<0.05).
p<0.05;
p<0.001.