BACKGROUND: Gathering clinical evidence data on patients' palliative care needs is paramount to identify changes in outcomes over time and maintaining on-going quality improvement. Implementation of patient-centred outcome measures has been widely recommended. The routine use of these instruments in daily practice is challenging and not widespread. AIM: To implement a patient-centred outcome measure in daily practice and fulfil one quality indicator: improve pain during the 72 h after admission, in at least 75% of patients. DESIGN: An observational prospective study. The Palliative care Outcome Scale was used at admission (T0), third day (T1) and weekly. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Hospital palliative care unit with 17 individual rooms. All patients admitted to the unit were included in the study. RESULTS: Preliminary results ( N = 84) revealed inconsistent and missing data (14%). Symptoms were sub-optimally controlled by T1. Processes changed, and only a team member could apply Palliative care Outcome Scale. Doctors were encouraged to grasp the meaning of Palliative care Outcome Scale results for each patient. The post-pilot included 317 patients. No missing data occurred. There was an improvement in most items between T0 and T1: 'pain' and 'other symptoms' presented statistical significant differences ( p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Implementing a patient-centred outcome measure in a hospital palliative care service is feasible and improves quality of care. Controlling high pain at T0 improved (>80%) by T1. Results became more consistent and symptom control was improved overall. Patients are evaluated based on holistic domains by an interdisciplinary team and we have added a much needed measure to help guide improvement of the quality of care provided.
BACKGROUND: Gathering clinical evidence data on patients' palliative care needs is paramount to identify changes in outcomes over time and maintaining on-going quality improvement. Implementation of patient-centred outcome measures has been widely recommended. The routine use of these instruments in daily practice is challenging and not widespread. AIM: To implement a patient-centred outcome measure in daily practice and fulfil one quality indicator: improve pain during the 72 h after admission, in at least 75% of patients. DESIGN: An observational prospective study. The Palliative care Outcome Scale was used at admission (T0), third day (T1) and weekly. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Hospital palliative care unit with 17 individual rooms. All patients admitted to the unit were included in the study. RESULTS: Preliminary results ( N = 84) revealed inconsistent and missing data (14%). Symptoms were sub-optimally controlled by T1. Processes changed, and only a team member could apply Palliative care Outcome Scale. Doctors were encouraged to grasp the meaning of Palliative care Outcome Scale results for each patient. The post-pilot included 317 patients. No missing data occurred. There was an improvement in most items between T0 and T1: 'pain' and 'other symptoms' presented statistical significant differences ( p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Implementing a patient-centred outcome measure in a hospital palliative care service is feasible and improves quality of care. Controlling high pain at T0 improved (>80%) by T1. Results became more consistent and symptom control was improved overall. Patients are evaluated based on holistic domains by an interdisciplinary team and we have added a much needed measure to help guide improvement of the quality of care provided.
Authors: Mellar P Davis; Lisa A Rybicki; Renato V Samala; Chirag Patel; Armida Parala-Metz; Ruth Lagman Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Sara C Handley; Molly Passarella; Ashley E Martin; Scott A Lorch; Sindhu K Srinivas; Ingrid M Nembhard Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2022-02-18 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Irene J Higginson; Barbara A Daveson; R Sean Morrison; Deokhee Yi; Diane Meier; Melinda Smith; Karen Ryan; Regina McQuillan; Bridget M Johnston; Charles Normand Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Kara Schick-Makaroff; Richard Sawatzky; Lena Cuthbertson; Joakim Öhlén; Autumn Beemer; Dominique Duquette; Mehri Karimi-Dehkordi; Kelli I Stajduhar; Nitya Suryaprakash; Landa Terblanche; Angela C Wolff; S Robin Cohen Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-10-18 Impact factor: 3.440