Literature DB >> 27383568

Outcome and Learning Curve in 159 Consecutive Patients Undergoing Total Laparoscopic Hemihepatectomy.

Marcel J van der Poel1, Marc G Besselink1, Federica Cipriani1, Thomas Armstrong1, Arjun S Takhar1, Susan van Dieren2, John N Primrose3, Neil W Pearce1, Mohammed Abu Hilal1.   

Abstract

Importance: Widespread implementation of laparoscopic hemihepatectomy is currently limited by its technical difficulty, paucity of training opportunities, and perceived long and harmful learning curve. Studies confirming the possibility of a short and safe learning curve for laparoscopic hemihepatectomy could potentially benefit the further implementation of the technique. Objective: To evaluate the extent and safety of the learning curve for laparoscopic hemihepatectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospectively collected single-center database containing all laparoscopic liver resections performed in our unit at the University Hospital Southampton National Health Service Foundation Trust between August 2003 and March 2015 was retrospectively reviewed; analyses were performed in December 2015. The study included 159 patients in whom a total laparoscopic right or left hemihepatectomy procedure was started (intention-to-treat analysis), including laparoscopic extended hemihepatectomies and hemihepatectomies with additional wedge resections, at a tertiary referral center specialized in laparoscopic hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end points were clinically relevant complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III). The presence of a learning curve effect was assessed with a risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis.
Results: Of a total of 531 consecutive laparoscopic liver resections, 159 patients underwent total laparoscopic hemihepatectomy (105 right and 54 left). In a cohort with 67 men (42%), median age of 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 51-73 years), and 110 resections (69%) for malignant lesions, the overall median operation time was 330 minutes (IQR, 270-391 minutes) and the median blood loss was 500 mL (IQR, 250-925 mL). Conversion to an open procedure occurred in 17 patients (11%). Clinically relevant complications occurred in 17 patients (11%), with 1% mortality (death within 90 days of surgery, n = 2). Comparison of outcomes over time showed a nonsignificant decrease in conversions (right: 14 [13%] and left: 3 [6%]), blood loss (right: 550 mL [IQR, 350-1150 mL] and left: 300 mL [IQR, 200-638 mL]), complications (right: 15 [14%] and left: 4 [7%]), and hospital stay (right: 5 days [IQR, 4-7 days] and left: 4 days [IQR, 3-5 days]). Risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis demonstrated a learning curve of 55 laparoscopic hemihepatectomies for conversions. Conclusions and Relevance: Total laparoscopic hemihepatectomy is a feasible and safe procedure with an acceptable learning curve for conversions. Focus should now shift to providing adequate training opportunities for centers interested in implementing this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27383568     DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  18 in total

1.  A Modified Liver Hanging Maneuver in Pure Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy with Preservation of the Middle Hepatic Vein: Video and Technique.

Authors:  Ji Hoon Kim; Jae-Woon Choi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  The learning curve in pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy: a cumulative sum analysis.

Authors:  Suk Kyun Hong; Kyung-Suk Suh; Kyung Chul Yoon; Jeong-Moo Lee; Jae-Hyung Cho; Nam-Joon Yi; Kwang-Woong Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic liver resection for large HCC: short- and long-term outcomes in relation to tumor size.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Gabriele Spoletini; Giovanni Vennarecci; Elisa Francone; Mohammed Abu Hilal; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic liver resection: a review of current indications and surgical techniques.

Authors:  Chenyang Jia; Hongyu Li; Ningyuan Wen; Junhua Chen; Yonggang Wei; Bo Li
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Critical appraisal of the impact of individual surgeon experience on the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection in the modern era: collective experience of multiple surgeons at a single institution with 324 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Brian K P Goh; Jin-Yao Teo; Ser-Yee Lee; Juinn-Huar Kam; Peng-Chung Cheow; Premaraj Jeyaraj; Pierce K H Chow; London L P J Ooi; Alexander Y F Chung; Chung-Yip Chan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Learning Curve in Laparoscopic Liver Resection, Educational Value of Simulation and Training Programmes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Théophile Guilbaud; David Jérémie Birnbaum; Stéphane Berdah; Olivier Farges; Laura Beyer Berjot
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Pure Laparoscopic Versus Hand-Assisted/Hybrid Major Hepatectomy at Two Western Centers.

Authors:  G Fiorentini; F Swaid; F Cipriani; F Ratti; C Heres; A Tsung; L Aldrighetti; D A Geller
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Robotic and laparoscopic right anterior sectionectomy and central hepatectomy: multicentre propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Hye Yeon Yang; Gi Hong Choi; Ken-Min Chin; Sung Hoon Choi; Nicholas L Syn; Tan-To Cheung; Adrian K H Chiow; Iswanto Sucandy; Marco V Marino; Mikel Prieto; Charing C Chong; Jae Hoon Lee; Mikhail Efanov; T Peter Kingham; Robert P Sutcliffe; Roberto I Troisi; Johann Pratschke; Xiaoying Wang; Mathieu D'Hondt; Chung Ngai Tang; Rong Liu; James O Park; Fernando Rotellar; Olivier Scatton; Atsushi Sugioka; Tran Cong Duy Long; Chung-Yip Chan; David Fuks; Ho-Seong Han; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 9.  Systematic review of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally-invasive surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Federica Cipriani; Francesca Ratti; Guido Fiorentini; Raffaella Reineke; Luca Aldrighetti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-02-22

Review 10.  Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis A Ziogas; Dimitrios Giannis; Stepan M Esagian; Konstantinos P Economopoulos; Samer Tohme; David A Geller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.