Literature DB >> 27382221

Comparison Between Concurrent EBRT and ICA with Conventional EBRT Followed by ICA in Cervical Cancer.

M Pandu Ranga Kumari1, B Nagarjun Reddy2, C Sanjeeva Kumari2, M Rama Krishna2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In carcinoma of cervix, if overall treatment time (OTT) is prolonged beyond 6 weeks, then the total dose required to achieve a given probability of tumor control is to be increased by 0.6 Gy for each day of prolongation, to control the accelerative repopulation of the cells, i.e., 1 % loss of tumor control, and to avoid increased treatment delays and drop outs due to the prolonged gap between EBRT and intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT).
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate local disease control and early complications of concomitant HDR-ICBT with EBRT and thereby decrease the OTT in I B-III B stage carcinoma cervix.
METHODS: Fifty patients of carcinoma cervix (FIGO-I B/III B) were randomly divided into two groups: the study group treated with concomitant EBRT and HDR-ICBT (EBRT = 50-50.4 Gy/25-28 Fr, HDR 7 Gy in 3 Fr during the 3rd, 4th, and 5th weeks), EBRT and weekly cisplatin were not given on the day of HDR-ICBT; and the control group treated with EBRT followed by HDR-ICBT and weekly cisplatin. Acute reactions and local disease response were compared after treatment and at 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Medians of OTTs were 42 and 63 days in the study and the control groups, respectively. Dysuria and diarrhoea incidences were more in the study but manageable. At the completion of the treatment, there were 92 and 80 % complete responses; 4 and 4 % partial responses; and 4 and 16 % stable diseases in the study group and the control group, respectively. DFSs (disease free survivals) at 6-month follow-up were, respectively, 96 and 84 %, and most of the stable diseases were observed in stage III B.
CONCLUSIONS: Response was better in the study group but statistically insignificant, acute reactions were manageable, and there was decrease in drop outs due to completion of treatment at a stretch, but larger number of patients and longer follow-up are required to arrive at concrete conclusions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Concurrent EBRT and HDR; Decreasing OTT; Early reactions; Local response; Preventing drop outs

Year:  2015        PMID: 27382221      PMCID: PMC4912481          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-014-0661-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  10 in total

Review 1.  Molecular mechanisms of radiation-induced accelerated repopulation.

Authors:  R K Schmidt-Ullrich; J N Contessa; P Dent; R B Mikkelsen; K Valerie; D B Reardon; G Bowers; P S Lin
Journal:  Radiat Oncol Investig       Date:  1999

2.  The effect of treatment duration in the local control of cervix cancer.

Authors:  A Fyles; T J Keane; M Barton; J Simm
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Evaluation of the response of concurrent high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy in management of early stage carcinoma cervix.

Authors:  Arvind Kumar Patidar; H S Kumar; Rahul V Walke; Pushpendra H Hirapara; Shankar Lal Jakhar; M R Bardia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2012-08-17

4.  Radiation therapy duration influences overall survival in patients with cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  J F Delaloye; P A Coucke; S Pampallona; G Peltecu; P De Grandi
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  The adverse effect of treatment prolongation in cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  D G Petereit; J N Sarkaria; R Chappell; J F Fowler; T J Hartmann; T J Kinsella; J A Stitt; B R Thomadsen; D A Buchler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-07-30       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  How worthwhile are short schedules in radiotherapy? A series of exploratory calculations.

Authors:  J F Fowler
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Primary radiotherapy of stage IIA/B-IIIB cervical carcinoma. A comparison of continuous versus sequential regimens.

Authors:  Arpád Mayer; Csaba Nemeskéri; Csaba Petneházi; Gábor Borgulya; Szilvia Varga; Attila Naszály
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  The influence of treatment time on outcome for squamous cell cancer of the uterine cervix treated with radiation: a patterns-of-care study.

Authors:  R M Lanciano; T F Pajak; K Martz; G E Hanks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Overall treatment time in advanced cervical carcinomas: a critical parameter in treatment outcome.

Authors:  T Girinsky; A Rey; B Roche; C Haie; A Gerbaulet; H Randrianarivello; D Chassagne
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1993-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Carcinoma of the uterine cervix. I. Impact of prolongation of overall treatment time and timing of brachytherapy on outcome of radiation therapy.

Authors:  C A Perez; P W Grigsby; H Castro-Vita; M A Lockett
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-07-30       Impact factor: 7.038

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.