Literature DB >> 2367691

How worthwhile are short schedules in radiotherapy? A series of exploratory calculations.

J F Fowler1.   

Abstract

A series of calculations is presented of log cell kill for most of the fractionated schedules that could conceivably be devised using 1, 2 or 3 fractions per day and 3, 5 or 7 treatment days per week, in overall times of 1 to 7 weeks inclusive. The basic assumption is that late reactions are kept constant, and that repair of sublethal damage is complete, i.e. intervals are at least 6 h. A wide range of effective doubling times of tumor cells is assumed: 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 20 days and infinity. The results show that optimum overall times depend primarily on (1) the doubling time for cells in the tumor and (2) the intrinsic radiosensitivity alpha (which is proportional to alpha/beta in one of the assumptions made here). Optimum overall times are proportional to (1) but can increase even more steeply with increasing radiosensitivity or alpha/beta. Short overall times are required for tumors with low alpha/beta and/or fast proliferation. Optimum overall times are, interestingly, relatively independent of the number and frequency of fractions. However, therapeutic ratios are higher if larger numbers of smaller fractions are used within the selected overall time. This is a critical factor in achieving adequate tumor cell kill. For median potential doubling times of 5 days, and median radiosensitivity, overall times of 2.5 to 4 weeks would be optimal. More slowly proliferating tumors, possibly about half of many types of carcinoma, should be treated with longer overall times, but selection is necessary. Doubling or halving the cell doubling time would mean 5-8 or 1.2-2 weeks overall time, respectively. Similarly, for a 5 day doubling time, a tumor with alpha/beta = 5 Gy should be treated in less than a week; but if alpha/beta = 20 Gy the optimum overall time could exceed 7 or 8 weeks. A tumor with cells that double in 3 days would require overall times of 0.3, 2.5 and 6.5 weeks for alpha/beta values of 5, 10 and 20 Gy, respectively. Acute effects (excluded in the analysis) would disqualify some of the shorter schedules. We can hope to know potential doubling times (from flow cytometry) and eventually values of alpha (and alpha/beta). It is important that assays of both should continue to be developed. When such individual values are available, optimum overall times can be chosen, as described here, within which the maximum practicable number of small fractions can be given.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2367691     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(90)90142-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  11 in total

Review 1.  21 years of biologically effective dose.

Authors:  J F Fowler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Pulsed brachytherapy: a modelled consideration of repair parameter uncertainties and their influence on treatment duration extension and daytime-only "block-schemes".

Authors:  T S A Underwood; R G Dale; A M Bidmead; C A Nalder; P R Blake
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Radiobiological assessment of non-standard and novel radiotherapy treatments using the linear-quadratic model.

Authors:  R G Dale
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Comparison Between Concurrent EBRT and ICA with Conventional EBRT Followed by ICA in Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  M Pandu Ranga Kumari; B Nagarjun Reddy; C Sanjeeva Kumari; M Rama Krishna
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-03-24

5.  Tumour proliferation assessed by combined histological and flow cytometric analysis: implications for therapy in squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck.

Authors:  M H Bennett; G D Wilson; S Dische; M I Saunders; C A Martindale; B M Robinson; A E O'Halloran; M D Leslie; J H Laing
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with tomotherapy in locally advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a phase I, docetaxel dose-escalation study, with hypofractionated radiation regimen.

Authors:  Alessandra Bearz; Emilio Minatel; Imad Abu Rumeileh; Eugenio Borsatti; Renato Talamini; Giovanni Franchin; Carlo Gobitti; Alessandro Del Conte; Marco Trovò; Tanja Baresic
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Reproducibility of measurements of potential doubling time of tumour cells in the multicentre National Cancer Institute protocol T92-0045.

Authors:  G D Wilson; N Paschoud; J J Pavy; K Weber; P Weber; B Dubray; P A Coucke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer-technical aspects and alternate fractionation.

Authors:  Hideya Yamazaki; Gen Suzuki; Satoaki Nakamura; Ken Yoshida; Koji Konishi; Teruki Teshima; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Thermal Neutron Relative Biological Effectiveness Factors for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy from In Vitro Irradiations.

Authors:  María Pedrosa-Rivera; Javier Praena; Ignacio Porras; Manuel P Sabariego; Ulli Köster; Michael Haertlein; V Trevor Forsyth; José C Ramírez; Clara Jover; Daniel Jimena; Juan L Osorio; Patricia Álvarez; Carmen Ruiz-Ruiz; María J Ruiz-Magaña
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Forecasting Individual Patient Response to Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer With a Dynamic Carrying Capacity Model.

Authors:  Mohammad U Zahid; Nuverah Mohsin; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Jimmy J Caudell; Louis B Harrison; Clifton D Fuller; Eduardo G Moros; Heiko Enderling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.