| Literature DB >> 27382150 |
Nicolai Meinshausen1, Alain Hauser2, Joris M Mooij3, Jonas Peters4, Philip Versteeg3, Peter Bühlmann5.
Abstract
Inferring causal effects from observational and interventional data is a highly desirable but ambitious goal. Many of the computational and statistical methods are plagued by fundamental identifiability issues, instability, and unreliable performance, especially for large-scale systems with many measured variables. We present software and provide some validation of a recently developed methodology based on an invariance principle, called invariant causal prediction (ICP). The ICP method quantifies confidence probabilities for inferring causal structures and thus leads to more reliable and confirmatory statements for causal relations and predictions of external intervention effects. We validate the ICP method and some other procedures using large-scale genome-wide gene perturbation experiments in Saccharomyces cerevisiae The results suggest that prediction and prioritization of future experimental interventions, such as gene deletions, can be improved by using our statistical inference techniques.Entities:
Keywords: genome database validation; graphical models; interventional–observational data; invariant causal prediction
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27382150 PMCID: PMC4941490 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1510493113
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205