Literature DB >> 27381010

Participants' Accounts on Their Decision to Join a Cohort Study With an Attached Biobank: A Qualitative Content Analysis Study Within Two German Studies.

Hélène Nobile1, Manuela M Bergmann2, Jennifer Moldenhauer2, Pascal Borry3.   

Abstract

Reliable participation and sustained retention rates are crucial in longitudinal studies involving human subjects and biomaterials. Understanding the decision to enroll is an essential step to develop adequate strategies promoting long-term participation. Semi-structured interviews were implemented with newly recruited and long-term participants randomly drawn from two ongoing longitudinal studies with a biobank component in Germany. Iterative qualitative content analysis was applied to the transcribed interviews. Participants (n = 31) expressed their decision to enroll or remain in the study as the result of the complex interplay of individual factors, institutional cues, study-related features, and societal dynamics. Different forms of trust were identified as central within the elements used to explain participation and could be compared to Dibben, Morris, and Lean's dynamic model of interpersonal trust. Given these high levels of trust, an investigation of the morality of the trustful relationship at stake between participants and research(ers) is warranted.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Germany; biobank; cohort study; decision; participation; qualitative interviews; trust

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27381010     DOI: 10.1177/1556264616657463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  5 in total

1.  Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting: the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research Results.

Authors:  Courtney Berrios; Cynthia A James; Karen Raraigh; Juli Bollinger; Brittney Murray; Crystal Tichnell; Carolyn D Applegate; Amanda L Bergner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Communicating With Diverse Patients About Participating in a Biobank: A Randomized Multisite Study Comparing Electronic and Face-to-Face Informed Consent Processes.

Authors:  Christian M Simon; Kai Wang; Laura A Shinkunas; Daniel T Stein; Paul Meissner; Maureen Smith; Rebecca Pentz; David W Klein
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Participants who were difficult to recruit at baseline are less likely to complete a follow-up questionnaire - results from the German National Cohort.

Authors:  Stefan Rach; Kathrin Günther; Birte Hadeler
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Understanding participation in European cohort studies of preterm children: the views of parents, healthcare professionals and researchers.

Authors:  Sandra C S Marques; Julia Doetsch; Georgia Abate; Anne Brødsgaard; Grazia Colombo; Marina Cuttini; Pernille Pedersen; Henrique Barros
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Patients' Willingness to Provide Their Clinical Data for Research Purposes and Acceptance of Different Consent Models: Findings From a Representative Survey of Patients With Cancer.

Authors:  Katja Mehlis; Eva C Winkler; Anja Köngeter; Christoph Schickhardt; Martin Jungkunz; Susanne Bergbold
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 7.076

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.