Literature DB >> 33430773

Understanding participation in European cohort studies of preterm children: the views of parents, healthcare professionals and researchers.

Sandra C S Marques1,2, Julia Doetsch1, Georgia Abate3, Anne Brødsgaard4,5, Grazia Colombo3, Marina Cuttini3, Pernille Pedersen4, Henrique Barros6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retention of participants in cohort studies is a major challenge. A better understanding of all elements involved in participation and attrition phenomena in particular settings is needed to develop effective retention strategies. The study aimed to achieve an in-depth understanding of participant retention in longitudinal cohorts focusing on participants' and researcher's perspectives, across three diverse socio-geographic and cultural settings.
METHODS: This study used a triangulation of multi-situated methods to collect data on cohort studies of children born with less than 32 weeks of gestation in Denmark, Italy and Portugal. It included focus groups and individual semi-driven interviewing with involved key actors (i.e. parents, staff, healthcare professionals, researchers) and a collaborative visual methodology. A purposive sample of 48 key actors (n = 13 in Denmark; n = 13 in Italy; n = 22 in Portugal) was collected. A triangulation of phenomenological thematic analysis with discourse analysis was applied. Cross-contextual and context-specific situational elements involved in participation and attrition phenomena in these child cohorts were identified at various levels and stages.
RESULTS: Main findings included: situational challenges affecting potential and range of possibilities for implementation strategies (geopolitical environment, societal changes, research funding models); situational elements related to particular strategies acting as deterrents (postal questionnaires) and facilitators (multiple flexible strategies, reminders, regular interaction); main motivations to enrol and participate (altruism/solidarity and gratitude/sense of duty to reciprocate); main motivational deterrents to participate to follow-up waves (lack of bonding, insufficient feedback); entanglement of clinical and research follow-up as facilitator and deterrent.
CONCLUSIONS: The multi-situated approach used, addressing the interplay of the lived experience of individuals, was of most value to understand participation variability under different implemented strategies in-context. Cross-contextual and context-specific situational elements that have been influential factors towards participation and attrition in the cohorts were identified.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collaborative visual methods; European cohorts; Longitudinal; Multi-situated qualitative study; Participation; Preterm children; Retention

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33430773      PMCID: PMC7802270          DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01206-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol        ISSN: 1471-2288            Impact factor:   4.615


  22 in total

1.  Postal contact with participating children and its impact on response rate: Japan Environment and Children's Pilot Study.

Authors:  Ayako Senju; Reiko Suga; Mayumi Tsuji; Eiji Shibata; Ayumi Anan; Yukiyo Yamamoto; Koichi Kusuhara; Toshihiro Kawamoto
Journal:  Pediatr Int       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 1.524

Review 2.  Parent and family outcomes following very preterm or very low birth weight birth: a review.

Authors:  Karli Treyvaud
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Empowerment through photo novella: portraits of participation.

Authors:  C Wang; M A Burris
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1994

4.  Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health.

Authors:  Michael Marmot; Sharon Friel; Ruth Bell; Tanja A J Houweling; Sebastian Taylor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  "Do I really want to do this?" Longitudinal cohort study participants' perspectives on postal survey design: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Helen Harcombe; Sarah Derrett; Peter Herbison; David McBride
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  How to Establish and Follow up a Large Prospective Cohort Study in the 21st Century--Lessons from UK COSMOS.

Authors:  Mireille B Toledano; Rachel B Smith; James P Brook; Margaret Douglass; Paul Elliott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates.

Authors:  Martha Abshire; Victor D Dinglas; Maan Isabella A Cajita; Michelle N Eakin; Dale M Needham; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  How are European birth-cohort studies engaging and consulting with young cohort members?

Authors:  Patricia J Lucas; Debra Allnock; Tricia Jessiman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Where are they now? Retention strategies over 25 years in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.

Authors:  Ellen Funkhouser; Jennifer Wammack; Cathy Roche; Jared Reis; Stephen Sidney; Pamela Schreiner
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2017-12-20
View more
  1 in total

1.  Strategies for assessing the impact of loss to follow-up on estimates of neurodevelopmental impairment in a very preterm cohort at 2 years of age.

Authors:  Aurélie Piedvache; Stef van Buuren; Henrique Barros; Ana Isabel Ribeiro; Elizabeth Draper; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 4.615

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.