Literature DB >> 27379874

Distinct information critically distinguishes judgments of face familiarity and identity.

Marie L Smith1, Blanka Volna1, Louise Ewing1.   

Abstract

Accurately determining the familiarity of another and correctly establishing their identity are vital social skills. A considerable body of work has explored their perceptual and neural underpinnings and debate remains regarding whether they are dissociable, that is, separable parts of a dual process, or different aspects of a common retrieval process. Less is known about the specific visual information that guides familiarity judgments and how this compares to the information used to identify a face by name. Here we sought to establish the critical information underlying participants' judgments of facial familiarity and identification. We created a new standardized stimulus set comprising 6 personally familiar and 12 unfamiliar faces and applied the Bubbles reverse-correlation methodology to establish the information driving correct performance in each task. Results revealed that markedly different information underlies familiarity and identity judgments. When categorizing familiarity, participants relied more upon lower spatial-frequency, broad facial cues (eye and face shape) than when categorizing identity, which relied on fine details in the internal features (eyes and mouth). These results provide novel evidence of qualitatively distinct information use in familiarity and identification judgments and emphasize the importance of considering the task set for participants and their processing strategy when investigating face recognition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27379874     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  3 in total

1.  Distinct neural processes for the perception of familiar versus unfamiliar faces along the visual hierarchy revealed by EEG.

Authors:  Elliot Collins; Amanda K Robinson; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Pupil-mimicry conditions trust in partners: moderation by oxytocin and group membership.

Authors:  Mariska E Kret; Carsten K W De Dreu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Photo ID verification remains challenging despite years of practice.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.