Literature DB >> 27379787

Complications After Plate Fixation of Displaced Pediatric Midshaft Clavicle Fractures.

Ying Li1, Peter Helvie, Frances A Farley, Matthew D Abbott, Michelle S Caird.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Operative treatment of displaced pediatric midshaft clavicle fractures has become increasingly popular, despite lack of evidence that surgical management leads to superior outcomes. Complications, such as plate irritation necessitating removal and wound infection, have been reported in adults. The purpose of this study was to evaluate complications after plate fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures in the pediatric population.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients 10 to 18 years old who had undergone plate fixation of a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture between 2009 and 2014. Patients who had surgery for a malunion or nonunion, and patients with <6 months of follow-up were excluded. Demographic data, radiographic union, time to return to activity, and complications were recorded. Any complication that led to unplanned surgery was considered a major complication.
RESULTS: We analyzed 36 patients (25 males, 11 females) with 37 fractures. The average age at surgery was 14.5±1.7 years and mean follow-up was 1.3±1.0 years. All of the fractures healed and average time to return to activity was 58±28 days. The overall postoperative complication rate was 86% (32/37): 59% (22/37) implant prominence or irritation, 16% (6/37) anterior chest wall numbness, 5% (2/37) superficial wound dehiscence or infection, 3% (1/37) refracture adjacent to the plate, and 3% (1/37) refracture after implant removal. The major complication rate was 43% (16/37). Fifteen patients underwent a second surgery for implant removal secondary to prominence or pain. One patient underwent revision open reduction and internal fixation after he sustained a refracture at the distal aspect of the plate that resulted in a painful nonunion. Only 1 patient had a refracture after implant removal and this was treated nonoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Implant prominence or irritation is common after plate fixation of displaced pediatric midshaft clavicle fractures. A second surgery for implant removal may be necessary. Patients should be appropriately counseled regarding complications before plate fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-therapeutic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 27379787     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  5 in total

1.  Flexible intramedullary nailing versus nonoperative treatment for paediatric displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

Authors:  I A Mukhtar; K M Yaghmour; A F Ahmed; T Ibrahim
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 1.548

2.  Intermediate-Term Outcomes Following Operative and Nonoperative Management of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Children and Adolescents: Internal Fixation May Improve Outcomes.

Authors:  Ishaan Swarup; Bhargavi Maheshwer; Steven Orr; Clare Kehoe; Yi Zhang; Emily Dodwell
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-01-19

3.  Rates of readmission and reoperation after operative management of midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents.

Authors:  Laura A Carrillo; Hao-Hua Wu; Aman Chopra; Matt Callahan; Toshali Katyal; Ishaan Swarup
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-12-18

4.  Increase in surgical fixation of pediatric midshaft clavicle fractures since 2008.

Authors:  Elina Sassi; Juuli Hannonen; Willy Serlo; Juha-Jaakko Sinikumpu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Plating versus elastic stable intramedullary nailing for displaced pediatric midshaft clavicular fractures.

Authors:  Pan Hong; Ruikang Liu; Saroj Rai; Renhao Ze; Xin Tang; Jin Li
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2022-08-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.