| Literature DB >> 35197020 |
Elina Sassi1,2, Juuli Hannonen3, Willy Serlo3, Juha-Jaakko Sinikumpu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clavicle fractures in children have traditionally been treated non-operatively. In adults, a great increase in operative treatment has been reported. We aimed to analyze the respective trend and potential explanatory factors in children.Entities:
Keywords: Children and adolescents; Clavicle; Fracture; Operative treatment; Surgical fixation
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35197020 PMCID: PMC8864931 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04918-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1The figure presents a flow chart of the study’s inclusion and exclusion criteria, showing how the study population was selected
Fig. 2The rate of annual surgical fixation of clavicle midshaft fractures in children aged < 16 years during 2008–2019 as adjusted for 100,000 children at risk in the Northern Finland Hospital District. There has been a jump in surgical care since 2015
Fig. 3The age distribution of the children (N = 172), < 16 years of age, with clavicle fractures in the study area during 2008–2019
The comparison of the characteristics of the patients, injuries, fractures and treatment between the beginning of the study period (2008–2010) and the end of the period (2017–2019)
| 2008-2010 | 2017-2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | ||
| 27 | 87 | ||
| Age (Mean (SD)) | 5.5 (4.2) | 8.5 (4.7) | |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 20 (74.1) | 63 (72.4) | 0.5 |
| Sports injury | 2 (7.4) | 23 (26.4) | |
| Traffic injury | 2 (7.4) | 11 (12.6) | 0.5 |
| Fall <1m | 18 (66.7) | 44 (50.6) | 0.1 |
| Fall >1m | 5 (18.5) | 9 (10.3) | 0.2 |
| Displacement | |||
| Sideway (mm (SD)) | 6.9 (2.1) | 9.7 (1.1) | 0.3 |
| > bone thickness | 7 (70.0) | 23 (54.8) | 0.5 |
| Shortening (Mean (SD)) | 8.2 (1.7) | 13.2 (1.9) | 0.2 |
| Shortening > 15mm | 0 (0) | 8 (27.6) | 0.3 |
| Angulation | 27.7 (2.7) | 27.3 (1.7) | 0.9 |
| Surgical fixation | 0 (0) | 14 (16.1) | 0.04** |
| Number of follow-up visits (Mean (SD)) | 0.8 (0.1) | 1.1 (0.1) | 0.1 |
| Number of follow-up radiographs (Mean (SD)) | 1.4 (0.5) | 1.7 (1.2) | 0.1 |
| Time to free mobilization (weeks) (Mean (SD)) | 2.4 (0.4) | 3.4 (0.6) | 0.4 |
*Tested by Exact test or SND test (**). Student T-test used for continuous variables
Characteristics of the study population
| N | % | |
|---|---|---|
| 172 | 100 | |
| Male | 116 | 67.4 |
| 7.7 | 4.8 | |
| Left | 96 | 55.8 |
| Sports injury | 41 | 23.8 |
| Traffic injury | 24 | 14.0 |
| Fall <1m | 18 | 10.5 |
| Fall >1m | 89 | 51.7 |
Fig. 4The figure presents the essential surgical methods used in treating middle-third-clavicle fractures by operative means in this study population: Case 1: Preoperative (A) and postoperative (B) radiographs of a patient operated with plate and screw fixation. Case 2: Preoperative (C) radiographs of a patient treated with intramedullary rodding and the respective postoperative radiography (D)