Literature DB >> 11585418

Uterine adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth versus uterine carcinosarcoma: comparison of treatment and survival.

T C Krivak1, J D Seidman, J W McBroom, P J MacKoul, L M Aye, G S Rose.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Uterine adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth (ASSO) is a rare variant of uterine sarcoma first described in 1989. This clinicopathologic study was undertaken to compare the treatment and survival of uterine adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth to that of uterine carcinosarcomas.
METHODS: A review of uterine sarcomas diagnosed at Washington Hospital Center from January 1988 to December 1998 was performed. Records were reviewed for demographic data, surgical staging, primary and adjuvant therapy, metastatic site, disease recurrence, and survival. All pathology was reviewed and diagnosis confirmed. Statistical analysis included chi(2) test and Student's t test. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to estimate the median and 5-year survival times. The log-rank test was used to compare survival times. A P value <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Sixty patients were diagnosed with uterine sarcoma at Washington Hospital Center. Of these, 33 (55%) were uterine carcinosarcomas, 11 (18%) ASSOs, 6 (10%) adenosarcomas, and 10 (17%) leiomyosarcomas. Of the patients diagnosed with uterine ASSO, 3 (27%) were stage I, 3 (27%) stage II, 1 (9%) stage III, and 4 (36%) stage IV. All 11 patients with uterine ASSO underwent total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and tumor debulking. Postoperative adjuvant therapy included chemotherapy (n = 4), radiation (n = 4), combination radiation and chemotherapy (n = 1), and no adjuvant therapy (n = 2). The overall median survival time of patients with uterine ASSO was 13 months. Nine of eleven patients are dead of disease, and two patients (both with stage I) are alive without evidence of disease at 18 and 19 months. Thirty-three patients with carcinosarcoma were identified, with follow-up available on 29 patients. Of these, 10 (34%) were stage I, 6 (22%) stage II, 3 (10%) stage III, and 10 (34%) stage IV. Twenty-seven of the twenty-nine patients diagnosed with carcinosarcoma underwent surgical therapy to include total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, staging and tumor debulking. Two patients died prior to treatment. Postoperative adjuvant therapy included chemotherapy (n = 9), radiation (n = 13), combination (n = 1), and no further therapy (n = 4). Twenty of the twenty-nine patients are dead of disease; there were nine surviving patients at the time of this report (stage I-5, stage II-3, stage III-1). The median survival of these patients was 31 months, with an overall 5-year survival of 22%. Comparison of the Kaplan-Meier survival curves using the log-rank test suggests a worse prognosis for uterine ASSO. However, this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.0522).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with uterine ASSO have a poor prognosis similar to that of carcinosarcoma. Management should include complete surgical staging. Additional therapy in the form of radiation, chemotherapy, or both has been reported; however, the superiority of one modality could not be determined from our data. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11585418     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  22 in total

1.  Female Sex Hormone Receptor Profiling in Uterine Adenosarcomas.

Authors:  Jenna Z Marcus; Merieme Klobocista; Rouzan G Karabakhtsian; Eric Prossnitz; Gary L Goldberg; Gloria S Huang
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 2.  [New features in the 2014 WHO classification of uterine neoplasms].

Authors:  S F Lax
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Mullerian adenosarcoma of the cervix with heterologous elements and sarcomatous overgrowth.

Authors:  Varsha Podduturi; Karen R Pinto
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2016-01

4.  Significance of lymph node metastasis on survival of women with uterine adenosarcoma.

Authors:  Hiroko Machida; Michael J Nathenson; Tsuyoshi Takiuchi; Crystal L Adams; Jocelyn Garcia-Sayre; Koji Matsuo
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Uterine adenosarcoma: an analysis on management, outcomes, and risk factors for recurrence.

Authors:  Amy Carroll; Pedro T Ramirez; Shannon N Westin; Pamela T Soliman; Mark F Munsell; Alpa M Nick; Kathleen M Schmeler; Ann H Klopp; Nicole D Fleming
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 6.  Uterine Adenosarcoma: a Review.

Authors:  Michael J Nathenson; Vinod Ravi; Nicole Fleming; Wei-Lien Wang; Anthony Conley
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  [Uterine sarcoma treatment].

Authors:  G Köhler
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.011

8.  Extragenital adenosarcoma: a case report, review of the literature, and management discussion.

Authors:  Gloria S Huang; Rebecca C Arend; Antoinette Sakaris; Tiffany M Hebert; Gary L Goldberg
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Genomewide copy number analysis of Müllerian adenosarcoma identified chromosomal instability in the aggressive subgroup.

Authors:  Jen-Chieh Lee; Tzu-Pin Lu; Chun A Changou; Cher-Wei Liang; Hsien-Neng Huang; Alexandra Lauria; Hsuan-Ying Huang; Chin-Yao Lin; Ying-Cheng Chiang; Ben Davidson; Ming-Chieh Lin; Kuan-Ting Kuo
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 10.  [Grading of gynecological tumors : Current aspects].

Authors:  L-C Horn; D Mayr; C E Brambs; J Einenkel; I Sändig; K Schierle
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.011

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.