Simion I Chiosea1, Lester D R Thompson2, Ilan Weinreb3, Julie E Bauman4, Alyssa M Mahaffey5, Caitlyn Miller5, Robert L Ferris6, William E Gooding7. 1. Depatment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. chioseasi@upmc.edu. 2. Department of Pathology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Woodland Hills, California. 3. Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. Depatment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 6. Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 7. Biostatistics Facility, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The authors hypothesized that histogenetic classification of salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) could account for de novo tumors and those with morphologic or molecular evidence (pleomorphic adenoma gene 1 [PLAG1], high-mobility group AT hook 2 [HMGA2] rearrangement, amplification) of pleomorphic adenoma (PA). METHODS: SDCs (n = 66) were reviewed for morphologic evidence of PA. PLAG1 and HMGA2 alterations were detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). PLAG1-positive tumors were tested by FISH for fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) rearrangement. Thirty-nine tumors were analyzed using a commercial panel for mutations and copy number variations in 50 cancer-related genes. RESULTS: On the basis of combined morphologic and molecular evidence of PA, 4 subsets of SDC emerged: 1) carcinomas with morphologic evidence of PA but intact PLAG1 and HMGA2 (n = 22); 2) carcinomas with PLAG1 alteration (n = 18) or 3) HMGA2 alteration (n = 12); and 4) de novo carcinomas, without morphologic or molecular evidence of PA (n = 14). The median disease-free survival was 37 months (95% confidence interval, 28.4-45.6 months). Disease-free survival and other clinicopathologic parameters did not differ for the subsets defined above. Combined Harvey rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog/phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit α (HRAS/PIK3CA) mutations were observed predominantly in de novo carcinomas (5 of 8 vs 2 of 31 tumors; P = .035). Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) copy number gain was not observed in de novo carcinomas (0 of 8 vs 12 of 31 tumors; P = .08). Tumor protein 53 (TP53) mutations were more common in SDC ex pleomorphic adenomas than in de novo carcinomas (17 of 31 vs 1 of 8 tumors; P = .033). CONCLUSIONS: The genetic profile of SDC varies with the absence or presence of pre-existing PA and its cytogenetic signature. Most de novo SDCs harbor combined HRAS/PIK3CA mutations and no ERBB2 amplification. Cancer 2016;122:3136-44.
BACKGROUND: The authors hypothesized that histogenetic classification of salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) could account for de novo tumors and those with morphologic or molecular evidence (pleomorphic adenoma gene 1 [PLAG1], high-mobility group AT hook 2 [HMGA2] rearrangement, amplification) of pleomorphic adenoma (PA). METHODS: SDCs (n = 66) were reviewed for morphologic evidence of PA. PLAG1 and HMGA2 alterations were detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). PLAG1-positive tumors were tested by FISH for fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) rearrangement. Thirty-nine tumors were analyzed using a commercial panel for mutations and copy number variations in 50 cancer-related genes. RESULTS: On the basis of combined morphologic and molecular evidence of PA, 4 subsets of SDC emerged: 1) carcinomas with morphologic evidence of PA but intact PLAG1 and HMGA2 (n = 22); 2) carcinomas with PLAG1 alteration (n = 18) or 3) HMGA2 alteration (n = 12); and 4) de novo carcinomas, without morphologic or molecular evidence of PA (n = 14). The median disease-free survival was 37 months (95% confidence interval, 28.4-45.6 months). Disease-free survival and other clinicopathologic parameters did not differ for the subsets defined above. Combined Harvey ratsarcoma viral oncogene homolog/phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate 3-kinase, catalytic subunit α (HRAS/PIK3CA) mutations were observed predominantly in de novo carcinomas (5 of 8 vs 2 of 31 tumors; P = .035). Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) copy number gain was not observed in de novo carcinomas (0 of 8 vs 12 of 31 tumors; P = .08). Tumor protein 53 (TP53) mutations were more common in SDC ex pleomorphic adenomas than in de novo carcinomas (17 of 31 vs 1 of 8 tumors; P = .033). CONCLUSIONS: The genetic profile of SDC varies with the absence or presence of pre-existing PA and its cytogenetic signature. Most de novo SDCs harbor combined HRAS/PIK3CA mutations and no ERBB2 amplification. Cancer 2016;122:3136-44.
Authors: Surbhi Gupta; Antoine R Ramjaun; Paula Haiko; Yihua Wang; Patricia H Warne; Barbara Nicke; Emma Nye; Gordon Stamp; Kari Alitalo; Julian Downward Journal: Cell Date: 2007-06-01 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Catherine Grasso; Timothy Butler; Katherine Rhodes; Michael Quist; Tanaya L Neff; Stephen Moore; Scott A Tomlins; Erica Reinig; Carol Beadling; Mark Andersen; Christopher L Corless Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2014-11-07 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Michael Jaehne; Kerstin Roeser; Thorsten Jaekel; Jan David Schepers; Natalie Albert; Thomas Löning Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Stefan Glück; Jeffrey S Ross; Melanie Royce; Edward F McKenna; Charles M Perou; Eli Avisar; Lin Wu Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-03-04 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Katsutoshi Oda; Jennifer Okada; Luika Timmerman; Pablo Rodriguez-Viciana; David Stokoe; Keiko Shoji; Yuji Taketani; Hiroyuki Kuramoto; Zachary A Knight; Kevan M Shokat; Frank McCormick Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Ilan Weinreb; Justin A Bishop; Simion I Chiosea; Raja R Seethala; Bayardo Perez-Ordonez; Lei Zhang; Yun-Shao Sung; Chun-Liang Chen; Adel Assaad; Bahram R Oliai; Cristina R Antonescu Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: N Chooback; Y Shen; M Jones; K Kasaian; M Martin; T Ng; T Thomson; M Marra; J Laskin; C Ho Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Nora Katabi; Bin Xu; Achim A Jungbluth; Lei Zhang; Sung Y Shao; Jason Lane; Ronald Ghossein; Cristina R Antonescu Journal: Histopathology Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Adepitan A Owosho; Olufunlola M Adesina; Oluwole Odujoko; Hezekiah Akinyemi; Akinwumi Komolafe; Simon Tadros; Robert Bauer; Kurt F Summersgill Journal: Int J Clin Exp Pathol Date: 2022-02-15
Authors: Juan C Hernandez-Prera; Daryoush Saeed-Vafa; Amin Heidarian; Kathleen Gewandter; Kristen Otto; Bruce M Wenig Journal: Head Neck Pathol Date: 2021-08-19
Authors: Pierre Saintigny; Yoshitsugu Mitani; Kristen B Pytynia; Renata Ferrarotto; Dianna B Roberts; Randal S Weber; Merrill S Kies; Sankar N Maity; Sue-Hwa Lin; Adel K El-Naggar Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-10-05 Impact factor: 6.860