Literature DB >> 27379444

Alcohol-approach inclinations and drinking identity as predictors of behavioral economic demand for alcohol.

Jason J Ramirez1, Ashley A Dennhardt2, Scott A Baldwin3, James G Murphy2, Kristen P Lindgren1.   

Abstract

Behavioral economic demand curve indices of alcohol consumption reflect decisions to consume alcohol at varying costs. Although these indices predict alcohol-related problems beyond established predictors, little is known about the determinants of elevated demand. Two cognitive constructs that may underlie alcohol demand are alcohol-approach inclinations and drinking identity. The aim of this study was to evaluate implicit and explicit measures of these constructs as predictors of alcohol demand curve indices. College student drinkers (N = 223, 59% female) completed implicit and explicit measures of drinking identity and alcohol-approach inclinations at 3 time points separated by 3-month intervals, and completed the Alcohol Purchase Task to assess demand at Time 3. Given no change in our alcohol-approach inclinations and drinking identity measures over time, random intercept-only models were used to predict 2 demand indices: Amplitude, which represents maximum hypothetical alcohol consumption and expenditures, and Persistence, which represents sensitivity to increasing prices. When modeled separately, implicit and explicit measures of drinking identity and alcohol-approach inclinations positively predicted demand indices. When implicit and explicit measures were included in the same model, both measures of drinking identity predicted Amplitude, but only explicit drinking identity predicted Persistence. In contrast, explicit measures of alcohol-approach inclinations, but not implicit measures, predicted both demand indices. Therefore, there was more support for explicit, versus implicit, measures as unique predictors of alcohol demand. Overall, drinking identity and alcohol-approach inclinations both exhibit positive associations with alcohol demand and represent potentially modifiable cognitive constructs that may underlie elevated demand in college student drinkers. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27379444      PMCID: PMC5048495          DOI: 10.1037/pha0000086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  51 in total

Review 1.  Deconstructing relative reinforcing efficacy and situating the measures of pharmacological reinforcement with behavioral economics: a theoretical proposal.

Authors:  W K Bickel; L A Marsch; M E Carroll
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.

Authors:  Anthony G Greenwald; Brian A Nosek; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-08

3.  Distractibility moderates the relation between automatic alcohol motivation and drinking behavior.

Authors:  Suzan R Farris; Brian D Ostafin; Tibor P Palfai
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2010-03

4.  The behavioral economics of driving after drinking among college drinkers.

Authors:  Jenni B Teeters; James G Murphy
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Relative reinforcing efficacy of alcohol among college student drinkers.

Authors:  James G Murphy; James MacKillop
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Compelled to consume: the Implicit Association Test and automatic alcohol motivation.

Authors:  Brian D Ostafin; Tibor P Palfai
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2006-09

7.  Change in delay discounting and substance reward value following a brief alcohol and drug use intervention.

Authors:  Ashley A Dennhardt; Ali M Yurasek; James G Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The effect of drink price and next-day responsibilities on college student drinking: a behavioral economic analysis.

Authors:  Jessica R Skidmore; James G Murphy
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2011-03

Review 9.  Quantifying reinforcement value and demand for psychoactive substances in humans.

Authors:  Adrienne J Heinz; Todd C Lilje; Jon D Kassel; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Curr Drug Abuse Rev       Date:  2012-12

10.  Elevated alcohol demand is associated with driving after drinking among college student binge drinkers.

Authors:  Jenni B Teeters; Alison M Pickover; Ashley A Dennhardt; Matthew P Martens; James G Murphy
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.455

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A dual process perspective on advances in cognitive science and alcohol use disorder.

Authors:  Kristen P Lindgren; Christian S Hendershot; Jason J Ramirez; Edward Bernat; Mauricio Rangel-Gomez; Kirsten P Peterson; James G Murphy
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-04-11

Review 2.  A review of implicit and explicit substance self-concept as a predictor of alcohol and tobacco use and misuse.

Authors:  Kristen P Lindgren; Clayton Neighbors; Melissa L Gasser; Jason J Ramirez; Dario Cvencek
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.829

3.  Examination of approach and avoidance inclinations on the reinforcing value of alcohol.

Authors:  Emily T Noyes; Robert C Schlauch
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 4.  Concurrent validity of the Alcohol Purchase Task for measuring the reinforcing efficacy of alcohol: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victor Martínez-Loredo; Alba González-Roz; Roberto Secades-Villa; José R Fernández-Hermida; James MacKillop
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 7.256

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.