Extensin and Arabinogalactan-Protein Biosynthesis: Glycosyltransferases, Research Challenges, and Biosensors.

Recent research, mostly in Arabidopsis thaliana, has led to the identification and characterization of the glycosyltransferases responsible for the biosynthesis of two of the most functionally important and abundant families of plant cell wall proteins, extensins, and arabinogalactan-proteins. Extensin glycosylation involves monogalactosylation of serine residues by O-α-serine galactosyltransferase and the addition of oligoarabinosides one to five arabinose units in length to contiguous hydroxyproline residues by a set of specific arabinosyltransferase enzymes, which includes hydroxyproline O-β-arabinosyltransferases, β-1,2-arabinosyltransferases, and at least one α-1,3-arabinosyltransferase. AGP glycosylation, however, is much more complex and involves the addition of large arabinogalactan polysaccharide chains to non-contiguous hydroxyproline residues. These arabinogalactan chains are composed of β-1,3-galactan backbones decorated with β-1,6-galactose side chains that are further modified with α-arabinose as well as other sugars, including β-(methyl)glucuronic acid, α-rhamnose, and α-fucose. Specific sets of hydroxyproline O-β-galactosyltransferases, β-1,3-galactosyltransferases, β-1,6-galactosyltransferases, α-arabinosyltransferases, β-glucuronosyltransferases, α-rhamnosyltransferases, and α-fucosyltransferases are responsible for the synthesis of these complex structures. This mini-review summarizes the EXT and AGP glycosyltransferases identified and characterized to date along with corresponding genetic mutant data, which addresses the functional importance of EXT and AGP glycosylation. In one case, genetic mutant data indicate that the carbohydrate moiety of arabinogalactan-proteins may serve as an extracellular biosensor or signal for normal cellular growth. Finally, future research challenges with respect to understanding the function of these enzymes more completely and discovering and characterizing additional glycosyltransferases responsible for extensin and arabinogalactan-protein biosynthesis are also discussed.

Introduction

Extensins (EXTs) and arabinogalactan-proteins (AGPs) are plant cell wall hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins (HRGPs) and represent two of the most post-translationally modified and abundant protein families in plants and on Earth. EXTs are characterized by the repeating pentapeptide sequence Ser-Hyp-Hyp-Hyp-Hyp (SO4) or variations thereof, such as SO3 and SO5 as well as by monogalactosylation of some Ser residues and oligoarabinosylation of most Hyp residues (Showalter, 1993; Kieliszewski and Lamport, 1994; Liu et al., 2016). EXTs are rod-like glycoproteins that exist in a polyproline II helix stabilized by the oligoarabinosides wrapping around the protein backbone (Van Holst and Varner, 1984; Shpak et al., 2001). Some EXTs contain Tyr residues that are modified to form intramolecular isodityrosine crosslinks or intermolecular di-isodityrosine or pulcherosine crosslinks (Brady and Fry, 1997; Brady et al., 1998). Intramolecular crosslinks cause “kinks” in the rods, while intermolecular crosslinks result in formation of EXT networks in the wall. Such crosslinks may be important in regulating growth and development and in forming a defensive barrier to pathogens. EXT-pectin crosslinks also exist, but their extent and functional significance is unknown (Qi et al., 1995).

In contrast, AGPs are much more heavily glycosylated than EXTs and are not diagnostically characterized by SO3, SO4, and SO5 repeats. Instead, AGPs have an abundance of Hyp, Ala, Ser, and Thr residues and are often characterized by the occurrence of Ala-Pro, Pro-Ala, Ser-Pro, Thr-Pro, Val-Pro, and Gly-Pro dipeptide repeats. Extensive glycosylation of AGPs occurs on clustered, non-contiguous Hyp residues and consists of arabinose and galactose-rich polysaccharide side chains. Arabinogalactan (AG) side chains attached to the AGP core protein allow AGPs to react with a chemical called Yariv reagent, which is useful for identifying, quantitating, and localizing AGPs (Showalter, 2001; Seifert and Roberts, 2007). AG polysaccharides are composed of β-1,3-galactan backbones decorated with β-1,6-galactose side chains that are further modified with α-arabinose as well as other sugars, including β-(methyl)glucuronic acid, α-rhamnose, and α-fucose. Based on microscopic observations and modeling of Hyp-AG side chains, AGPs are spheroidal or rod-like molecules, corresponding to the wattle blossom and twisted hairy rope models of AGP structure, respectively. While there is little evidence for AGP-AGP crosslinking, there is evidence for AGP-pectin and AGP-pectin-arabinoxylan crosslinking (Kjellbom et al., 1997; Tan et al., 2013). Most AGPs have glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchors, which allow them to attach to the plasma membrane and reside in the periplasm. Specific phospholipases are thought to allow for release of these AGPs into the wall.

Much of the recent work on EXTs and AGPs has focused on the biosynthesis of their carbohydrate moieties and the functional contributions of these moieties (Tan et al., 2012; Knoch et al., 2014). Most of this work has used Arabidopsis thaliana as the model. Interestingly, cellulosic biofuel research, which in part requires a deeper understanding of cell wall biosynthesis and the associated biosynthetic enzymes, has served as a major driving force to examine HRGP biosynthesis and particularly the associated glycosyltransferases (GTs) responsible for decorating their protein backbones with specific sugar side chains. This mini-review focuses on these GTs that act on EXTs (Figure ) and AGPs (Figure ), the use of reverse genetics/mutants to dissect the functional roles of these sugar moieties (Table ), and research challenges in this field.

Biosynthesis of EXTs (A) and AGPs (B) and the possible role of a fasciclin-like AGP (SOS5/FLA4) as an extracellular biosensor (C). (A) Sites of action of known glycosyltransferases acting on EXTs are depicted within a representative EXT glycomodule sequence found in an EXT molecule. (B) Sites of action of known glycosyltransferases acting on AGPs are depicted within a representative AGP glycomodule sequence found within an AGP molecule. (C) Proposed model that links AGP-Hyp GALTs, GALT2 and GALT5 with SOS5 (FLA4) and FEI1/FEI2 in regulating cellular signaling of root growth. Signaling of normal root growth likely involves GALT2/GALT5-dependent glycosylation of SOS5 and glycosylated SOS5 binding FEI1/FEI2, which in turn triggers binding of FEI1/FEI2 to ACC synthase, specifically ACS5, to form a scaffold complex. The ACC synthase in the scaffold is thought to lead to the localized production of ACC, a potential signaling molecule of cell wall integrity. In contrast, when GALT2/GALT5-dependent SOS5 glycosylation is inhibited or when SOS5 or FEI1/FEI2 is disrupted, ACC synthase (ACS5) is not bound to FEI1/FEI2 and thus is not part of the scaffold. Consequently, the unbound ACC synthase produces non-localized ACC, which is converted to ethylene, and serves to inhibit cellulose synthase/cellulose biosynthesis. Such weaker or compromised cell walls lead to root tip swelling in response to elevated NaCl or sucrose treatment. It is also likely that GALT3, GALT4, and GALT6 as well as HPGT1, HPGT2, and HPGT3 play redundant or partially redundant roles to GALT2 and GALT5 in this pathway.

EXT Glycosyltransferases

At least nine genes are involved with EXT glycosylation in Arabidopsis (Figure ; Table ). One of these genes, SERINE GALACTOSYLTRANSFERASE1 (SGT1), is responsible for adding single galactose residues to Ser residues in SO4 sequences, but not in SP4 sequences. This gene was identified in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by sequencing a protein with O-α-serine galactosyltransferase activity; subsequently, homologous genes were identified in Nicotiana tabacum and Arabidopsis thaliana (Saito et al., 2014). The SGT1 enzyme was localized primarily to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane and to the Golgi, and its activity requires the presence of Hyp residues. SGT1 was initially absent from the CAZy database, but now is considered a member of the GT96 family.

The other eight genes involved with EXT glycosylation encode arabinosyltransferases with specific substrate specificities and enzymatic activities. Three of these genes (HPAT1, HPAT2, and HPAT3) encode hydroxyproline O-β-arabinosyltransferases (HPATs), which add single arabinose residues to Hyp residues in SO4 sequences (Ogawa-Ohnishi et al., 2013). These genes were identified in Arabidopsis by affinity purification and sequencing proteins that demonstrated HPAT activity. These three genes/enzymes are related to GT8 family members, but were placed in a new family, GT95. Three other genes, REDUCED RESIDUAL ARABINOSE1-3 (RRA1, RRA2, and RRA3), encode arabinosyltransferases that add the second arabinose residue in a β-1,2 linkage (Egelund et al., 2007; Velasquez et al., 2011). These three genes/enzymes are GT77 family members and were discovered by genetic mutant analysis. Another gene, XYLOGLUCANASE113 (XEG113), encodes the arabinosyltransferase which adds the third arabinose residue also in a β-1,2 linkage (Gille et al., 2009). This gene/enzyme is also in GT77 and was discovered from a genetic mutant analysis involving treatment of Arabidopsis with a fungal endogluconase. Another gene, EXTENSIN ARABINOSE DEFICIENT (ExAD), encodes the arabinosyltransferase that adds the fourth arabinose in an α-1,3 linkage (Velasquez et al., 2012). This gene/enzyme is a member of GT47 and was discovered using a genetic mutant approach similar to that used to find the RRAs. All the EXT arabinosyltransferases identified above are localized to the Golgi.

While the extent of Hyp-arabinosylation is variable for EXTs with most having three or four arabinose residues per Hyp, some EXTs have five arabinose residues. This indicates that at least one more arabinosyltransferase gene likely exists to encode the transfer of this fifth arabinose.

EXT Glycosyltransferase Mutants

EXT GT genetic mutants have provided a powerful approach to determine the functional contributions of the carbohydrate moieties that decorate EXTs. The current list of these mutants appears in Table along with their respective mutant phenotypes. For example, sgt1 mutants display larger rosettes and longer roots (Saito et al., 2014; Velasquez et al., 2015). The hpat mutants demonstrate several pleiotropic phenotypes including impaired pollen tube growth, early senescence, early flowering, defects in cell wall thickening, enhanced hypocotyl elongation, and shorter root hairs (Ogawa-Ohnishi et al., 2013; Velasquez et al., 2015; MacAlister et al., 2016). Interestingly, rra and xeg113 mutants also share one of the phenotypes displayed by hpat mutants, namely reduced root hair growth (Egelund et al., 2007; Gille et al., 2009; Velasquez et al., 2011, 2015).

AGP Glycosyltransferases

To date, 17 different genes corresponding to seven distinct enzymes are involved with AGP glycosylation in Arabidopsis (Figure ; Table ). AGP glycosylation is initiated by the action of hydroxyproline O-β-galactosyltransferase, which places the first galactose residue onto Hyp residues in AGP core proteins. Eight genes encoding this activity are known. Five of these were identified using bioinformatics and verified by heterologous expression coupled with an in vitro enzyme assay and by genetic mutant analysis (Basu et al., 2013, 2015a,b). These genes, named GALT2, GALT3, GALT4, GALT5, and GALT6, exist as a small gene family within GT31. Each gene encodes a GALT domain as well as a GALECTIN domain. Another similar gene in GT31, GALT1, also encodes both of these domains, but is not involved in AGP glycosylation; instead this gene is involved in adding galactose to Lewis a structures (Strasser et al., 2007). The other three genes were found by sequencing proteins selected by affinity chromatography with an AGP peptide and by heterologous expression coupled with an enzyme assay and by genetic mutant analysis (Ogawa-Ohnishi and Matsubayashi, 2015). These genes, named HPGT1, HPGT2, and HPGT3, form another small gene family within GT31, but lack a GALECTIN domain. GALT3-6 and HPGT1 are localized to Golgi; however, GALT2 is localized to both ER and Golgi, indicating AGP glycosylation may begin in the ER, but likely mainly occurs in Golgi.

Three additional AGP galactosyltransferase genes are known. One encodes a β–1,3-galactosyltransferase activity and likely functions in β–1,3-galactan backbone synthesis. This gene, At1g77810, was identified by bioinformatics and demonstrated to add galactose to a synthetic β–1,3-galactose disaccharide following heterologous expression in COS cells (Qu et al., 2008). This gene resides in GT31 along with a number of other putative Arabidopsis galactosyltransferases that may act on AGPs. Another GT31 gene, GALT31A, encodes a β–1,6-galactosyltransferase (Geshi et al., 2013). This gene was heterologously expressed in E. coli and Nicotiana benthamiana and elongated β–1,6-galactan side chains of AGP glycans. The other characterized galactosyltransferase gene, GALT29A, demonstrated the same enzymatic activity encoded by GALT31A as well as an additional branching activity, adding β–1,6-galactose to β–1,3-galactans of AGP glycans (Dilokpimol et al., 2014). GALT29A was identified as being co-expressed with GALT31A and resides in GT29, not GT31. GALT29A and GALT31A interact with one another based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis and demonstrated enhanced enzymatic activity, suggesting these enzymes act cooperatively and exist in an enzyme complex (Dilokpimol et al., 2014).

Three β-glucuronosyltransferase genes, GlcAT14A, GlcAT14B, and GlcAT14C, add glucuronic acid to AGPs (Knoch et al., 2013; Dilokpimol and Geshi, 2014). All three genes/enzymes are members of GT14 and are reported to add glucuronic acid to both β–1,6- and β–1,3-galactose chains in an in vitro enzyme assay following heterologous expression in Pichia pastoris. Glucuronic acid imparts a negative charge to AGPs and provides a potential site for calcium binding; both of these properties likely have functional ramifications (Lamport and Várnai, 2013).

Two α-fucosyltransferase genes, FUT4 and FUT6, encode enzymes which add α-1,2-fucose residues to AGPs (Wu et al., 2010; Liang et al., 2013; Tryfona et al., 2014). These genes were identified by bioinformatics and demonstrated to add fucose to AGPs following heterologous expression in BY2 cells (Wu et al., 2010). These enzymes appear to be partially redundant as they display somewhat different AGP substrate specificities. Both genes/enzymes reside in GT37. Fucose is not present in all AGPs, including those produced by BY2 cells, a fact that was exploited to verify their activity.

Finally, one gene encodes an arabinosyltransferase that may act on AGPs based on genetic mutant analysis in Arabidopsis. Mutations in this gene resulted in plants with a reduced level of arabinose, particularly 3-linked arabinofuranose, in their AGPs, leading to its name, REDUCED ARABINOSE YARIV1, or RAY1 (Gille et al., 2013). This gene/enzyme is in GT77, the same family that contains RRA1-3 AND XEG113, enzymes responsible for EXT arabinosylation (Egelund et al., 2007; Gille et al., 2009; Velasquez et al., 2011). Thus, it was not surprising when heterologous expression of RAY1 in Nicotiana benthamiana demonstrated β–arabinosyltransferase activity to methyl β–galactose. Since α-linked arabinose, and not β-linked arabinose, is reported in AGPs, it remains unclear whether RAY1 functions in AGP biosynthesis.

AGP Glycosyltransferase Mutants

Many AGP GT genetic mutants are characterized and beginning to reveal the importance of AGP glycosylation to AGP function (Table ). The galt2-6 single mutants revealed some physiological phenotypes under normal growth conditions, including reduced root hair length and density for galt2, galt3, and galt5, reduced seed set for galt4 and galt6, reduced adherent seed coat mucilage for galt3 and galt6, and premature senescence for galt6 (Basu et al., 2013, 2015a,b). However, galt2galt5 double mutants showed more severe and pleiotropic physiological phenotypes than the single mutants with respect to root hair length and density and seed coat mucilage; double mutants also displayed more rosette leaves, delayed flowering, and shorter siliques (Basu et al., 2013, 2015a,b). Such findings are consistent with the idea that as additional redundant or partially redundant genes are knocked-out for a particular enzyme activity, more severe physiological phenotypes will be revealed. The pleiotropic nature of these mutations highlights the widespread occurrence of AGPs throughout the plant and the functional importance of AGP carbohydrate moieties. These ideas were also supported by hpgt mutant data. Specifically, hpgt1-3 single mutants showed no obvious phenotypes under normal growth conditions, however, hpgt1hpgt2hpgt3 triple mutants showed several pleiotropic phenotypes including longer lateral roots, increased root hair length and density, thicker roots, smaller rosette leaves, shorter petioles, shorter inflorescence stems, reduced fertility, and shorter siliques (Ogawa-Ohnishi and Matsubayashi, 2015). Some of these phenotypes were observed in the galt mutants.

With respect to other AGP galactosyltransferase genes, a single knockout mutant only exists for GALT31A (Geshi et al., 2013). This mutant, however, is embryo lethal, exhibiting abnormal cell division in the hypophysis, despite specific expression of GALT31A in the embryo suspensor cells.

Knockout mutants for GlcAT14A-C showed enhanced cell elongation rates in dark grown hypocotyls and light grown roots during seedling growth (Knoch et al., 2013; Dilokpimol and Geshi, 2014). However, since several sugars were altered in these mutants in addition to reduced glucuronic acid, the mutant phenotypes may reflect contributions of these other Knockout mutants for FUT4 and FUT6 show no obvious phenotypes under normal conditions; however, root growth is significantly inhibited in these mutants when grown in salt (Liang et al., 2013; Tryfona et al., 2014). This conditional phenotype reveals the importance of this minor sugar component of some AGPs with respect to root growth and salt sensitivity.

Finally, a knockout mutant for RAY1 exhibits pleiotropic effects, reduced root growth, reduced rosette size, and reduced inflorescence size (Gille et al., 2013). The above ground mutant phenotypes, however, may be a secondary effect of impaired root growth.

Clearly, a range of phenotypes is observed for these AGP GT mutants. This indicates the important and diverse functions that AGP glycans play in plant vegetative and reproduction growth and development.

Research Challenges

As research on EXT and AGP GTs moves forward, several questions and challenges come to mind:

There is a need to identify and characterize the remaining EXT and AGP GT genes/enzymes in Arabidopsis, including the EXT arabinosyltransferase for the fifth arabinose and other AGP β–1,3-galactosyltransferases and β–1,6-galactosyltransferases along with many α-arabinosyltransferases and α-rhamnosyltransferases, which await discovery. There is also a need to extend this research to other plant species. Interestingly, there is no evidence for any processive GTs involved in synthesizing HRGPs, such as the β–1,3-galactan backbone or β–1,6-galactan side chains of AGPs. Thus, it is conceivable that each sugar in an AGP (or EXT) is added by a specific, non-processive enzyme.

It is important to determine the exact enzymatic activity for each EXT and AGP GT. In other words, does the GT act on all or only a subset of EXTs or AGPs? What is the peptide or glycan substrate specificity for each EXT or AGP GT? How do these GTs regulate the extent, length, sequence, and heterogeneity of the sugar additions?

Clearly, multiple EXT and AGP GTs exist and catalyze identical, or very similar, enzymatic activities. Thus, it becomes important to determine whether these genes are redundant, partially redundant, or non-redundant. Such determinations are likely to involve examination of organ/tissue-specific expression patterns, elucidating substrate specificities, and genetic mutant analysis.

For some AGP hydroxyproline O-β-galactosyltransferases, namely GALT2-6, what is the function of the GALECTIN domain?

Do EXT and AGP GTs act cooperatively and in enzyme complexes? To date, only one study has provided support for this idea (Dilokpimol et al., 2014).

For the GT mutants, it becomes important to know exactly which EXTs and AGPs are modified and the chemical details of such modifications in order to relate structure to function.

It will be useful to grow and examine the various GT mutants side-by-side under identical environmental conditions, ideally in the same laboratory, to ensure accurate comparisons.

Higher order GT mutants, particularly in cases where gene families encode a particular EXT GT (e.g., RRA1–3) or AGP GT (e.g., GALT2–6, HPGT1–3), should be produced and examined for functional redundancy.

AGPs as Extracellular Sensors or Signals

Based on bioinformatic predictions, approximately half of the AGPs in Arabidopsis are GPI-anchored to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane (Showalter et al., 2010). This cell surface location provides an ideal venue for GPI-anchored AGPs to sense the extracellular environment and relay such information to other plasma membrane proteins involved in cellular signaling. For example, GPI-anchored AGPs may act as biochemical pressure/turgor sensors or may serve to selectively bind and release calcium ions (Lamport and Várnai, 2013). In recent years, evidence for a GPI-anchored AGP named SALT OVERLY SENSITIVE 5 (SOS5) being involved in cellular signaling of root growth has accumulated (Shi et al., 2003; Xu et al., 2008). SOS5, also known as FASCICLIN-LIKE AGP4 or FLA4, acts in a single genetic pathway that involves two cell wall leucine-rich, repeat receptor-like kinases (RLKs), called FEI1 and FEI2. Recently, GALT2 and GALT5 were shown to exist in this genetic pathway, and likely are responsible for glycosylating SOS5 to allow it to function in this signaling pathway by directly or indirectly interacting with FEI1/FEI2 (Figure ) (Basu et al., 2016). GALT3, GALT4, and GALT6 as well as HPGT1-3, may play redundant or partially redundant roles to GALT2 and GALT5 in this pathway. While the downstream mechanism remains to be elucidated, cellulose synthesis is the likely target, which leads to weaker cell walls and root tip swelling in the mutants.

GALT2, GALT5, SOS5, and FEI2 also function together in another signaling pathway leading to seed coat mucilage adherence (Basu et al., 2016). Mutations in these four genes, as well as higher order mutant combinations, lead to reduced mucilage adherence. While the downstream mechanism here may also involve cellulose synthesis, it is suggested to primarily involve pectin structure or assembly (Harpaz-Saad et al., 2011, 2012; Griffiths et al., 2014).

Concluding Remarks

Carbohydrate largely defines the molecular surfaces and hence the functions of EXTs and AGPs. Thus, it is of importance to understand how the various sugars are added to EXTs and AGPs and contribute to their functions not only in terms of basic science, but also for potential applications in biomimetics and biofuel production. Genetic mutant analysis of the various GT mutants is beginning to provide such insight. Finally, up to this point, GTs involved with EXT and AGP biosynthesis were identified and characterized mainly from Arabidopsis; however, future work on isolating and characterizing homologous or similar GTs acting on EXTs and AGPs from other members of the plant kingdom promises to extend and enrich our knowledge of these important enzymes.

Author Contributions

AS outlined and wrote the manuscript. DB assisted with writing the manuscript and prepared the figure and table for the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Table 1

Information on the enzymes, genes, and genetic mutants for EXT∗ and AGP∗∗ glycosylation.

Enzyme Abbreviation	Enzyme	GT Family	Localization	Gene Identifier	Mutants	Mutant phenotypes	Reference
SGT1∗	serine O-α-galactosyltransferase	GT96	ER and Golgi	At3g01720	sgt1-1 (SALK_059879)sgt1-2 (SALK_054682)	Longer roots, larger rosettes, and reduced SGT activity	Saito et al., 2014; Velasquez et al., 2015
HPAT1∗HPAT2∗HPAT3∗	hydroxyproline O-β-arabinosyltransferase	GT95GT95GT95	Golgi	At5g25265At2g25260At5g13500	hpat1 (GABI_298B03), hpat2 (SAIL_178_H04), hpat3 (SALK_047668)	Impaired pollen tube growth, early senescence, early flowering, defects in cell wall thickening, enhanced hypocotyl elongation, shorter root hairs, and reduction in HPAT activity	Ogawa-Ohnishi et al., 2013; Velasquez et al., 2015; MacAlister et al., 2016
RRA1∗RRA2∗RRA3∗	β-1,2-arabinosyltransferase	GT77GT77GT77	GolgiGolgiGolgi	At1g75120At1g75110At1g19360	rra1 (SAIL_590_G09 Garlic_76_G04),rra2 (Garlic_244_A03 SAIL_70_D08)rra3 (GABI_233B05)	Reduced root hair growth and reduced levels of arabinose in the mutant	Egelund et al., 2007; Velasquez et al., 2011, 2015
XEG113∗	β-1,2-arabinosyltransferase	GT77	Golgi	At2g35610	xeg113–1 (SALK_066991),xeg113–3 (SALK_058092)	Reduced root hair growth and reduced levels of arabinose in the mutant	Gille et al., 2009; Velasquez et al., 2011
ExAD∗	α-1,3-arabinosyltransferase	GT47	–	–	–	–	Velasquez et al., 2012
GALT2∗∗GALT3∗∗GALT4∗∗GALT5∗∗GALT6∗∗ HPGT1∗∗HPGT2∗∗HPGT3∗∗	hydroxyproline-O-β-galactosyltransferase	GT31GT31GT31GT31GT31GT31GT31GT31	ER and GolgiGolgiGolgiGolgiGolgiGolgi––	At4g21060At3g06440At1g27120At1g74800At5g62620At5g53340At4g32120At2g25300	galt2-1 (SALK_117233)galt2-2 (SALK_141126)galt3-1 (SALK_085633)galt3-2 (SALK_005178)galt4-1 (SALK_136251)galt4-2 (SALK_131723)galt5-1 (SALK_105404)galt5-2 (SALK_115741)galt6-1 (SAIL_59_D08)galt6-2 (SAIL_70_B02)hpgt1-1 (SALK_007547)hpgt2-1 (SALK_070368)hpgt3-1 (SALK_009405)	Reduced root hair length and density for galt2, galt3, and galt5, reduced seed set for galt4 and galt6, reduced adherent seed coat mucilage for galt3 and galt6, premature senescence for galt6, root and pollen tubes are less sensitive to β-Yariv reagent for galt2-6, reduced root growth and root tip swelling in elevated NaCl and sucrose for galt2-6, reduced AGP content and Hyp-O-GALT activity for galt2-6; galt2galt5 double mutants show more severe and pleiotropic phenotypes than galt single mutants with respect to reduced root hair length and density, adherent seed coat mucilage, AGP content, and Hyp-O-GALT activity; galt2galt5 double mutants also display more rosette leaves, delayed flowering, and shorter siliquesBoth the double (hpgt2-1hpgt3-1) and triple (hpgt1-1hpgt2-1hpgt3-1) mutants exhibit longer lateral roots, increased root hair length and density, thicker roots, smaller rosette leaves, shorter petioles, shorter inflorescence stems, reduced fertility in the lower portion of the inflorescence, and shorter siliques, reduced AGP content and Hyp-O-GALT activity	Basu et al., 2013, 2015a,b, 2016;Ogawa-Ohnishi and Matsubayashi, 2015
AT1G77810∗∗	β-1,3-galactosyltransferase	GT31	Golgi	At1g77810	Not reported	–	Qu et al., 2008
GALT31A∗∗	β-1,6-galactosyltransferase	GT31	Golgi	At1g32930	galt31A (FLAG_379B06)	Embryo lethal mutant	Geshi et al., 2013
GALT29A∗∗	β-1,6-galactosyltransferase	GT29	Golgi	At1g08280	Not reported	–	Dilokpimol et al., 2014
GlcAT14A∗∗GlcAT14B∗∗GlcAT14C∗∗	β-1,6-glucuronosyltransferase	GT14GT14GT14	Golgi––	At5g39990At5g15050At2g37585	glcat14a-1 (SALK_06433)glcat14a-2 (SALK_043905)	Enhanced cell elongation in seedlings and reduced GlcA substitution on β–1,6–galactobiose and β–1,3–galactan in their AGPs	Knoch et al., 2013; Dilokpimol and Geshi, 2014
FUT4∗∗FUT6∗∗	α-1,2-fucosyltransferase	GT37GT37	–Golgi	At2g15390At1g14080	fut4-1 (SAIL_284_B)fut4-2 (SALK_12530)fut6-1 (SALK_0783)fut6-2 (SALK_09950)	Reduced root growth under salt stress, fut4 lacks fucose only in leaf AGPs whereas fut4fut6 double mutants lack fucose both in leaf and root AGPs	Wu et al., 2010; Liang et al., 2013; Tryfona et al., 2014
RAY1∗∗	β-arabinofuranosyltransferase	GT77	Golgi	At1g70630	ray1-1 (SALK_053158)ray1-2 (GABI_001C09)	Reduced root growth, reduced rosette size, and delayed inflorescence size, decreased arabinose in etiolated seedlings, roots, and rosette leaves	Gille et al., 2013