Literature DB >> 20076968

Changes in intra-abdominal pressure and spontaneous breath volume by magnitude of lifting effort: highly trained athletes versus healthy men.

Masashi Kawabata1, Norihiro Shima, Hatsuyuki Hamada, Isamu Nakamura, Hidetsugu Nishizono.   

Abstract

Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is closely related to breathing behavior during lifting. Abdominal muscles contribute to both IAP development and respiratory function. The purpose of this study was to examine whether spontaneous breath volume and IAP altered with increased isometric lifting effort, and to compare the effect of different abdominal muscle strengths on these parameters. Maximal IAP during the Valsalva maneuver (maxIAP) and maximal isometric trunk flexor strength were measured in 10 highly trained judo athletes (trained) and 11 healthy men (controls). They performed isometric lifting with 0 (rest), 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, and 100% of maximal lifting effort (MLE). Natural inspiratory and expiratory volumes were calculated from air-flow data immediately before and after the start of lifting. IAP, measured using an intra-rectal pressure transducer during lifting, was normalized by maxIAP (%maxIAP). Trained athletes had higher maxIAP and stronger trunk flexor muscles than controls. A significant main effect of lifting effort was found on %maxIAP and respiratory volume. An interaction (lifting effort by group) was found only for %maxIAP. No significant group main effect or interaction was found for respiratory volume. Inspiratory volume increased significantly from tidal volume to above 60 and 45% of MLE in trained athletes and controls, respectively. Expiratory volume decreased significantly from tidal volume at above 30% of MLE in both the groups. These results suggest that spontaneous breath volume and IAP development are coupled with increased lifting effort, and strong abdominal muscles can modify IAP development and inspiratory behavior during lifting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20076968     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-1344-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  30 in total

1.  Effects of abdominal belts on intra-abdominal pressure, intra-muscular pressure in the erector spinae muscles and myoelectrical activities of trunk muscles.

Authors:  K Miyamoto; N Iinuma; M Maeda; E Wada; K Shimizu
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Diaphragm recruitment during nonrespiratory activities.

Authors:  F Al-Bilbeisi; F D McCOOL
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Increase in spinal stability obtained at levels of intra-abdominal pressure and back muscle activity realistic to work situations.

Authors:  M Essendrop; T B Andersen; B Schibye
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Differences in muscle activation patterns during pelvic floor muscle contraction and Valsalva maneuver.

Authors:  Judith A Thompson; Peter B O'Sullivan; N Kathryn Briffa; Patricia Neumann
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Intra-abdominal pressure increases stiffness of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Paul W Hodges; A E Martin Eriksson; Debra Shirley; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The effect of an abdominal belt on trunk muscle activity and intra-abdominal pressure during squat lifts.

Authors:  S M McGill; R W Norman; M T Sharratt
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Intra-abdominal pressure and trunk muscle activity during lifting. IV. The causal factors of the intra-abdominal pressure rise.

Authors:  B Hemborg; U Moritz; H Löwing
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1985

8.  Postural effects on intra-abdominal pressure during Valsalva maneuver.

Authors:  G D Goldish; J E Quast; J J Blow; M A Kuskowski
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  The influence of sudden perturbations on trunk muscle activity and intra-abdominal pressure while standing.

Authors:  A G Cresswell; L Oddsson; A Thorstensson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Validity of rectal pressure measurements as indication of intra-abdominal pressure changes during urodynamic evaluation.

Authors:  T A McCarthy
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  13 in total

1.  Associations of maximal voluntary isometric hip extension torque with muscle size of hamstring and gluteus maximus and intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  Kota Tayashiki; Kosuke Hirata; Kiraku Ishida; Hiroaki Kanehisa; Naokazu Miyamoto
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Regular change in spontaneous preparative behaviour on intra-abdominal pressure and breathing during dynamic lifting.

Authors:  Masashi Kawabata; Norihiro Shima; Hidetsugu Nishizono
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effect of abdominal bracing training on strength and power of trunk and lower limb muscles.

Authors:  Kota Tayashiki; Sumiaki Maeo; Seiji Usui; Naokazu Miyamoto; Hiroaki Kanehisa
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Causal effect of intra-abdominal pressure on maximal voluntary isometric hip extension torque.

Authors:  Kota Tayashiki; Fumihiro Mizuno; Hiroaki Kanehisa; Naokazu Miyamoto
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Reproducibility of intra-abdominal pressure measured during physical activities via a wireless vaginal transducer.

Authors:  Marlene J Egger; Nadia M Hamad; Robert W Hitchcock; Tanner J Coleman; Janet M Shaw; Yvonne Hsu; Ingrid E Nygaard
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.091

6.  The control of respiratory pressures and neuromuscular activation to increase force production in trained martial arts practitioners.

Authors:  Sherrilyn Walters; Ben Hoffman; William MacAskill; Michael A Johnson; Graham R Sharpe; Dean E Mills
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Standardized suturing can prevent slackening or bursting suture lines in midline abdominal incisions and defects.

Authors:  C Lesch; K Uhr; M Vollmer; R Raschidi; R Nessel; F Kallinowski
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 2.920

Review 8.  Activity restrictions after gynecologic surgery: is there evidence?

Authors:  Ingrid E Nygaard; Nadia M Hamad; Janet M Shaw
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Intra-abdominal Pressure and Pelvic Floor Health: Should We Be Thinking About This Relationship Differently?

Authors:  Martin Dietze-Hermosa; Robert Hitchcock; Ingrid E Nygaard; Janet M Shaw
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.091

10.  A comparative study: tongue muscle performance in weightlifters and runners.

Authors:  Heidi A VanRavenhorst-Bell; Kathy L Coufal; Jeremy A Patterson; Antje S Mefferd
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.