| Literature DB >> 27376700 |
G Pounis1, A Di Castelnuovo1, S Costanzo1, M Persichillo1, M Bonaccio1, A Bonanni1, C Cerletti1, M B Donati1, G de Gaetano1, L Iacoviello1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27376700 PMCID: PMC4973136 DOI: 10.1038/nutd.2016.20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Diabetes ISSN: 2044-4052 Impact factor: 5.097
Distribution of various characteristics of Moli-sani participants according to BMI group
| N= | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | P | |||||||
| Age (years) | 49 (10) | 54 (11) | 57 (11) | <0.001 | 52 (12) | 53 (11) | 55 (11) | <0.001 |
| Socioeconomic status (score 0–8) | 3.89 (1.38) | 3.40 (1.34) | 3.11 (1.31) | <0.001 | 3.67 (1.40) | 3.53 (1.36) | 3.37 (1.32) | <0.001 |
| Physical activity level (Mets-hour) | 42.5 (7.1) | 43.0 (8.1) | 43.3 (8.9) | 0.002 | 44.3 (9.8) | 44.5 (10.5) | 44.3 (10.6) | 0.65 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 80.5 (7.7) | 91.5 (7.9) | 105 (10.3) | <0.001 | 86.7 (5.9) | 95.5 (5.7) | 108 (8.4) | <0.001 |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 95.4 (4.9) | 103 (5.2) | 114 (9.2) | <0.001 | 96.0 (4.6) | 102 (4.8) | 110 (7.2) | <0.001 |
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 0.84 (0.07) | 0.89 (0.07) | 0.92 (0.08) | <0.001 | 0.90 (0.05) | 0.94 (0.05) | 0.98 (0.05) | <0.001 |
| Energy intake (kcal per day) | 2070 (551) | 1998 (533) | 1964 (542) | <0.001 | 2417 (664) | 2398 (645) | 2451 (707) | 0.02 |
| Adherence to MeD (Italian score 0–11) | 3.97 (1.79) | 3.95 (1.74) | 3.94 (1.72) | 0.85 | 3.72 (1.76) | 3.80 (1.74) | 3.95 (1.74) | <0.001 |
| Pasta (grams per day) | 57.3 (30.4) | 57.1 (28.9) | 59.2 (30.8) | 0.03 | 75.6 (39.1) | 75.1 (37.9) | 78.5 (39.5) | 0.004 |
| Pasta (g kcal−1 of daily energy intake) | 0.028 | 0.029 | 0.031 | <0.001 | 0.0318 | 0.0317 | 0.0325 | 0.13 |
Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.
The number of underweight individuals was very low and did not affect the means of normal weight individuals (i.e., <1% of total population).
P-value derived through comparisons of continuous characteristics between BMI groups using one-way analysis of variance F-test and results are presented as mean (standard deviation).
Figure 1Linear regression analysis evaluating the association of pasta intake as grams per day or pasta-energy residuals or pasta-body weight residuals and BMI.
Linear regression analysis evaluating the association of pasta consumption with BMI in Moli-sani and INHES participantsa
| Unadjusted models | −0.012 (<0.001) | −0.002 (0.07) |
| Multi-adjusted models | −0.007 (0.003) | −0.001 (0.58) |
| Unadjusted models | −0.78 (<0.001) | −0.29 (<0.001) |
| Multi-adjusted models | −0.87 (<0.001) | −0.51 (<0.001) |
| Unadjusted models | −0.004 (0.01) | 0.005 (0.01) |
| Multi-adjusted models | −0.001 (0.36) | 0.002 (0.05) |
| Unadjusted models | −0.08 (0.25) | −0.40 (<0.001) |
| Multi-adjusted models | −0.18 (0.01) | −0.30 (<0.001) |
Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.
Results derived from linear regression analysis with main outcome the BMI (kg m−2) and independent variable the pasta-energy residuals or pasta-body weight residuals. Results are presented as β-coefficients (P-value) (for 1 unit increase in predicted residuals).
Models have been adjusted for age, socioeconomic status, physical activity level, energy intake and Mediterranean pattern adherence.
The β-coefficient for 1 unit increase in pasta-body weight residuals corresponded to 35 g per day increase in pasta intake.
Models have been adjusted for age, profession type, marital status, physical activity, energy intake and Mediterranean pattern adherence.
The β-coefficient for 1 unit increase in pasta-body weight residuals corresponded to 48 g per day increase in pasta intake.
Linear regression analysis stratified by body weight evaluating the association of pasta consumption (grams per day) with BMI in Moli-sani and INHES participantsa
| −0.11 (0.02) | −0.34 (<0.001) | −0.37 (0.001) | −0.44 (<0.001) | −0.37 (<0.001) | |
| −0.01 (0.84) | −0.17 (0.001) | −0.19 (0.002) | −0.25 (<0.001) | −0.23 (0.01) | |
| β-coef 48 g per day increase in pasta intake | 0.07 (0.16) | −0.001 (0.99) | −0.18 (0.001) | −0.01 (0.82) | −0.43 (0.03) |
| β-coef for 48 g per day increase in pasta intak | 0.06 (0.19) | 0.03 (0.57) | −0.18 (<0.001) | 0.02 (0.76) | −0.20 (0.04) |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index.
Results derived from linear regression analysis with main outcome the BMI (kg m−2) and independent variable pasta intake (grams per day) and are presented as β-coefficients (P-value).
Models have been adjusted for age, socio-economic status, physical activity level, energy intake and Mediterranean pattern adherence.
Models have been adjusted for age, profession type, marital status and physical activity, energy intake and Mediterranean pattern adherence.
Distribution of various characteristics of women and men INHES participants according to BMI groupa
| N= | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | P | |||||||
| Age (years) | 53 (16) | 60 (13) | 61 (12) | <0.001 | 53 (17) | 59 (14) | 58 (13) | <0.001 |
| <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||||
| Manual | 13.0 | 12.4 | 15.3 | 22.8 | 21.7 | 25.4 | ||
| Non manual | 36.5 | 19.6 | 15.1 | 36.1 | 30.8 | 27.5 | ||
| Housewife | 17.4 | 23.7 | 25.5 | Omitted | Omitted | Omitted | ||
| Retired | 25.4 | 40.9 | 41.3 | 31.6 | 43.9 | 43.2 | ||
| Student/ Unemployed | 7.7 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 9.5 | 3.5 | 4.0 | ||
| <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||||
| Single | 20.8 | 9.2 | 6.9 | 24.3 | 11.1 | 10.0 | ||
| Married | 67.6 | 76.4 | 74.7 | 72.5 | 84.9 | 83.9 | ||
| Separated | 2.7 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | ||
| Widow | 8.9 | 13.2 | 16.4 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 4.3 | ||
| Physically active (%) | 22.0 | 12.8 | 8.7 | <0.001 | 29.2 | 17.1 | 8.4 | <0.001 |
| Adherence to MeD (Italian score 0–11) | 3.61 (1.77) | 3.71 (1.73) | 3.82 (1.70) | 0.02 | 3.89 (1.74) | 3.98 (1.66) | 4.01 (1.74) | 0.17 |
| Energy intake (kcal per day) | 1789 (632) | 1777 (622) | 1842 (763) | 0.10 | 2089 (712) | 2059 (742) | 2157 (765) | 0.02 |
| Pasta (grams per day) | 49.4 (46.1) | 52.1 (46.1) | 56.4 (50.8) | 0.002 | 64.7 (48.9) | 62.7 (49.1) | 64.6 (48.7) | 0.44 |
| Pasta (g kcal−1 of daily energy intake) | 0.029 | 0.031 | 0.032 | 0.02 | 0.033 | 0.033 | 0.032 | 0.52 |
Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.
Results are presented as mean (standard deviation) for continuous variables and as frequencies for categorical data.
The number of underweight individuals was very low and did not affect the means of normal weight individuals (i.e., <1% of total population).
P-value derived through comparisons of continuous and categorical variables between BMI groups using the one-way analysis of variance F-test and Pearson's X2-test, respectively.
Linear regression analysis evaluating the association of pasta consumption with waist and hip circumference and waist-to-hip ratio in Moli-sani participantsa
| Pasta-energy residuals | ||
| Unadjusted models | −0.02 (<0.001) | −0.01(0.05) |
| Multi-adjusted models | −0.009 (0.12) | −0.003 (0.48) |
| Pasta-body weight residuals | ||
| Unadjusted models | −1.8 (<0.001) | −0.7 (<0.001) |
| Multi-adjusted models | −2.0 (<0.001) | −1.2 (<0.001) |
| Pasta-energy residuals | ||
| Unadjusted models | −0.02 (<0.001) | −0.003 (0.18) |
| Multi-adjusted models | −0.01 (0.03) | −0.0001 (0.97) |
| Pasta-body weight residuals | ||
| Unadjusted models | −1.5 (<0.001) | −0.6 (<0.001) |
| Multi-adjusted models | −1.7 (<0.001) | −1.0 (<0.001) |
| Pasta-energy residuals | ||
| Unadjusted models | −0.0001 (0.06) | −0.0001 (0.09) |
| Multi-adjusted models | −0.00001 (0.95) | −0.00002 (0.24) |
| Pasta-body weight residuals | ||
| Unadjusted models | −0.005 (<0.001) | −0.002 (0.004) |
| Multi-adjusted models | −0.005 (<0.001) | −0.003 (<0.001) |
Results derived from linear regression analysis with main outcome as the waist or hip circumference (cm) or waist-to-hip ratio and independent variable as the pasta-energy residuals or pasta-body weight residuals. Results are presented as β-coefficients (P-value) (for 1 unit increase in predicted residuals).
Models have been adjusted for age, socioeconomic status, physical activity level, energy intake and Mediterranean pattern adherence.
The β-coefficient for 1 unit increase in pasta-body weight residuals corresponded to 35 g per day increase in pasta intake.