| Literature DB >> 27376110 |
Tara S Rogers1, Marjorie G Garrod2, Janet M Peerson1, Darren J Hillegonds3, Bruce A Buchholz3, Elieke Demmer1, Christine Richardson1, Erik R Gertz2, Marta D Van Loan4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few interventions directly compare equivalent calcium and vitamin D from dairy vs. supplements on the same bone outcomes. The radioisotope calcium-41 ((41)Ca) holds promise as a tracer method to directly measure changes in bone resorption with differing dietary interventions.Entities:
Keywords: 41Ca; 41Ca, calcium-41; AI, adequate intake; AMS, accelerator mass spectrometry; ANOVA, analysis of variance; BAP, bone specific alkaline phosphatase; BMC, bone mineral content; BMD, bone mineral density; BMI, body mass index; CTx, serum C terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen; CV, coefficient of variation; Calcium supplement; DXA, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; Dairy; ELISA, enzyme linked immune-sorbent assay; HCl, hydrochloric acid; Kinetic model; NDSR, Nutrition Data System for Research; NH4OH, ammonium hydroxide; PTH, parathyroid hormone; Postmenopausal; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RDA, recommended dietary allowances; WHNRC, Western Human Nutrition Research Center; nCi, nanocurrie; qCT, quantitative computed tomography
Year: 2016 PMID: 27376110 PMCID: PMC4926806 DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2016.05.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone Rep ISSN: 2352-1872
Fig. 1Enrollment and follow up of participants in the randomized crossover trial.
Fig. 2Study design. After enrollment, women received a minute labeling dose of 41calcium, which was incorporated into the skeleton over a period of 180 days. Women were then randomly assigned to either the dairy or supplement interventions for 42 days. After a 42 day WO period, subjects completed the second intervention for 42 days.
Subject characteristics at baseline (n = 12 females).
| Parameter | Mean ± Standard deviation |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 55.4 ± 2.5 |
| Height (cm) | 163.0 ± 4.9 |
| Weight (kg) | 63.9 ± 8.5 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.2 ± 3.7 |
| Body fat (%) | 38.0 ± 7.4 |
| Fat-free mass (kg) | 37.2 ± 3.2 |
| Spine BMC (g) | 45.6 ± 4.1 |
| Spine BMD (g/cm2) | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
| Spine T-Score | − 0.82 ± 0.62 |
| Hip BMC (g) | 27.0 ± 2.4 |
| Hip BMD (g/cm2) | 0.9 ± 0.1 |
| Hip T-Score | − 0.88 ± 0.06 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 117 ± 21 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 75 ± 14 |
| PTH (pmol/L) | 59 ± 19 |
Average of right and left hip values.
Fig. 341/40Ca excretion ratio over time (n = 12) for each intervention period and WO. Significant differences were observed by week 1 of each intervention periods I, II and wash out (0.0007, 0.0056, < 0.0001, respectively).
Change in 41/40 Ca excretion during intervention and wash out periods.
| Days–Week | N | Mean | Standard deviation | Probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention - I | ||||
| 187 – week 1 | 12 | − 0.157 | 0.166 | 0.0007 |
| 194 – week 2 | 12 | − 0.271 | 0.0922 | < 0.0001 |
| 201 – week 3 | 12 | − 0.299 | 0.136 | < 0.0001 |
| 208 – week 4 | 12 | − 0.356 | 0.117 | < 0.0001 |
| 215 – week 5 | 12 | − 0.411 | 0.137 | < 0.0001 |
| 222 – week 6 | 12 | − 0.418 | 0.132 | < 0.0001 |
| Wash Out | ||||
| 229 – week 1 | 12 | 0.116 | 0.103 | 0.0024 |
| 236 – week 2 | 12 | 0.168 | 0.126 | 0.0007 |
| 243 – week 3 | 12 | 0.153 | 0.112 | 0.0006 |
| 250 – week 4 | 12 | 0.134 | 0.0931 | 0.0004 |
| 257 – week 5 | 12 | 0.187 | 0.133 | 0.0005 |
| 264 – week 6 | 12 | 0.176 | 0.122 | 0.0004 |
| Intervention – II | ||||
| 271 – week 1 | 12 | − 0.155 | 0.072 | < 0.0001 |
| 278 – week 2 | 12 | − 0.210 | 0.123 | 0.0002 |
| 285 – week 3 | 12 | − 0.250 | 0.0984 | < 0.0001 |
| 292 – week 4 | 12 | − 0.315 | 0.0929 | < 0.0001 |
| 299 – week 5 | 12 | − 0.315 | 0.124 | < 0.0001 |
| 306 – week 6 | 12 | − 0.326 | 0.133 | < 0.0001 |
Fig. 4Weekly least-square means for urinary 40Ca, 41Ca and the 41/40Ca ratio during interventions.