Andreas Schild1, Isabelle Herter-Aeberli2, Karin Fattinger1, Sarah Anderegg2, Tim Schulze-König3, Christof Vockenhuber3, Hans-Arno Synal3, Heike Bischoff-Ferrari4, Peter Weber5, Arnold von Eckardstein6, Michael B Zimmermann7. 1. Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; 2. Laboratory of Human Nutrition, Institute of Food, Nutrition, and Health, and. 3. Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; 4. Centre on Aging and Mobility, University of Zurich and Waid City Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland; Geriatric Clinic and. 5. Human Nutrition and Health, DSM Nutritional Products, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland; and. 6. Institute of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 7. Laboratory of Human Nutrition, Institute of Food, Nutrition, and Health, and michael.zimmermann@hest.ethz.ch.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ensuring adequate vitamin D status in older adults may reduce the risk of osteoporosis. The serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration is the recommended biomarker of vitamin D status, but the optimal serum 25(OH)D concentration for bone health in postmenopausal women remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to apply the highly sensitive (41)Ca skeletal labeling technique and the measurement of urinary (41)Ca:(40)Ca ratios to determine the serum 25(OH)D concentration that has greatest benefit on bone calcium flux in postmenopausal women. METHODS: We administered a mean intravenous (41)Ca dose of 870 pmol to healthy postmenopausal women [n = 24, age (mean ± SD): 64 ± 6.0 y] without osteoporosis. After 6 mo, at the nadir of their wintertime serum 25(OH)D status, each of the women sequentially consumed daily oral cholecalciferol supplements of 10, 25, and 50 μg/d (in this order), each for 3 mo. We assessed serum 25(OH)D concentrations monthly and urinary (41)Ca:(40)Ca ratios biweekly. (41)Ca:(40)Ca ratios were measured with low-energy accelerator mass spectrometry. With the use of pharmacokinetic analysis, we determined the effect of varying serum 25(OH)D concentrations on (41)Ca transfer rates. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean (95% CI) serum 25(OH)D concentration was 16.2 (13.5, 18.8) μg/L. After the first, second, and third intervention periods, mean (95% CI) serum 25(OH)D increased to 29.8 (27.2, 32.4), 36.9 (34.2, 39.7), and 46.6 (41.2, 52.0) μg/L, respectively. Supplementation was associated with a downward shift in the urinary (41)Ca:(40)Ca ratio compared with the predicted (41)Ca:(40)Ca ratio without vitamin D supplementation. In the model, the most likely site of action of the increase in serum 25(OH)D was transfer from the central compartment to a fast exchanging compartment. At this transfer rate, predicted values were a concentration with half-maximal effect of 2.33 μg/L and an estimate of the maximal effect of 31.7%. After the first, second, and third intervention periods, the mean changes in this transfer rate were +18.0%, +25.7%, and +28.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In healthy postmenopausal women, increasing serum 25(OH)D primarily affects calcium transfer from the central compartment to a fast exchanging compartment; it is possible that this represents transfer from the extracellular space to the surface of bone. A serum 25(OH)D concentration of ~40 μg/L achieves ~90% of the expected maximal effect on this transfer rate. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01053481.
BACKGROUND: Ensuring adequate vitamin D status in older adults may reduce the risk of osteoporosis. The serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration is the recommended biomarker of vitamin D status, but the optimal serum 25(OH)D concentration for bone health in postmenopausal women remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to apply the highly sensitive (41)Ca skeletal labeling technique and the measurement of urinary (41)Ca:(40)Ca ratios to determine the serum 25(OH)D concentration that has greatest benefit on bone calcium flux in postmenopausal women. METHODS: We administered a mean intravenous (41)Ca dose of 870 pmol to healthy postmenopausal women [n = 24, age (mean ± SD): 64 ± 6.0 y] without osteoporosis. After 6 mo, at the nadir of their wintertime serum 25(OH)D status, each of the women sequentially consumed daily oral cholecalciferol supplements of 10, 25, and 50 μg/d (in this order), each for 3 mo. We assessed serum 25(OH)D concentrations monthly and urinary (41)Ca:(40)Ca ratios biweekly. (41)Ca:(40)Ca ratios were measured with low-energy accelerator mass spectrometry. With the use of pharmacokinetic analysis, we determined the effect of varying serum 25(OH)D concentrations on (41)Ca transfer rates. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean (95% CI) serum 25(OH)D concentration was 16.2 (13.5, 18.8) μg/L. After the first, second, and third intervention periods, mean (95% CI) serum 25(OH)D increased to 29.8 (27.2, 32.4), 36.9 (34.2, 39.7), and 46.6 (41.2, 52.0) μg/L, respectively. Supplementation was associated with a downward shift in the urinary (41)Ca:(40)Ca ratio compared with the predicted (41)Ca:(40)Ca ratio without vitamin D supplementation. In the model, the most likely site of action of the increase in serum 25(OH)D was transfer from the central compartment to a fast exchanging compartment. At this transfer rate, predicted values were a concentration with half-maximal effect of 2.33 μg/L and an estimate of the maximal effect of 31.7%. After the first, second, and third intervention periods, the mean changes in this transfer rate were +18.0%, +25.7%, and +28.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In healthy postmenopausal women, increasing serum 25(OH)D primarily affects calcium transfer from the central compartment to a fast exchanging compartment; it is possible that this represents transfer from the extracellular space to the surface of bone. A serum 25(OH)D concentration of ~40 μg/L achieves ~90% of the expected maximal effect on this transfer rate. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01053481.
Authors: Tara S Rogers; Marjorie G Garrod; Janet M Peerson; Darren J Hillegonds; Bruce A Buchholz; Elieke Demmer; Christine Richardson; Erik R Gertz; Marta D Van Loan Journal: Bone Rep Date: 2016-05-09