| Literature DB >> 27376066 |
Célia von Siebenthal1, John-David Aubert2, Periklis Mitsakis3, Patrick Yerly4, John O Prior3, Laurent Pierre Nicod2.
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a rare disease, whose underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. It is characterized by pulmonary arterial vasoconstriction and vessels wall thickening, mainly intimal and medial layers. Several molecular pathways have been studied, but their respective roles remain unknown. Cardiac repercussions of PH are hypertrophy, dilation, and progressive right ventricular dysfunction. Multiple echocardiographic parameters are being used, in order to assess anatomy and cardiac function, but there are no guidelines edited about their usefulness. Thus, it is now recommended to associate the best-known parameters, such as atrial and ventricular diameters or tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. Cardiac catheterization remains necessary to establish the diagnosis of PH and to assess pulmonary hemodynamic state. Concerning energetic metabolism, free fatty acids, normally used to provide energy for myocardial contraction, are replaced by glucose uptake. These abnormalities are illustrated by increased (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography, which seems to be correlated with echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters.Entities:
Keywords: PET/CT; cardiac catheterization; echocardiography; pulmonary hypertension; right ventricle
Year: 2016 PMID: 27376066 PMCID: PMC4891340 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2016.00023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1Evolution of anatomical and functional abnormalities in small arterioles in PAH. (A) Normal vessel: vasodilation is predominant, by NO and PGI. (B) Hypertrophy and hyperplasia of endothelial cells, mediated by growth factors. (C) Hypertrophy and hyperplasia of smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts. Extravasation of inflammatory cells. Endothelial dysfunction and clots formation. (D) Plexiform lesions.
Figure 2Measure of the EI (D1/D2) on a short axis view. D1, anteroposterior diameter; D2, septo-lateral diameter (own unpublished data).
Advantages and downsides of parameters for evaluation of PH.
| Parameter | Advantages | Downsides |
|---|---|---|
| Decreased VO2 reflects limitation of maximal cardiac output, marker of impaired cardiac function. Good test to evaluate functional capacity, prognosis, and treatment response | Not suitable for most severe forms of PH needs technical expertise | |
| Well tolerated, even for severely disabled patients. Reproducible test, correlated with maximal exertion tests, survival, quality of life, NYHA class, and hemodynamic parameters in patients with moderate or severe disease | Walk distance reflects the global cardiovascular, pulmonary, and neuromuscular, not specific to PAH alone | |
| Good correlation with hemodynamic parameters. Evaluation of treatment response, predictive of survival | Important interobservers variability, subjective, and self-reported evaluation. Lacks of sensitivity | |
| Higher level associated with reduced survival. Correlated with hemodynamic parameters, and negatively correlated with cardiac output (CO) and RVEF. Indicator of long-term treatment response | Increased by any left or right cardiac pathology, overestimated in chronic renal impairment | |
| Non-invasive detection of perturbations in gas exchanges in pulmonary vessels. Strongly correlated with prognosis in systemic sclerosis | Prognostic value controversial in other forms of PAH. Not modified by treatment | |
| Gold standard for the diagnosis of PH. Used in clinical practice to differentiate pre- and post-capillary PH. SvO2 and right filling pressure have a good correlation with prognosis and survival | Invasive, not suitable for patients’ long-term follow-up | |
| Easily available, unexpensive. First tool for screening. Many parameters to evaluate global anatomy and function of the RV and LV, as well as valvular state. Correlation with right ventricular function and survival | High intra- and interobservers variability, 3D evaluation of the whole RV difficult. Many parameters remain semi-quantitative. RVEF unreliable, surrogate parameters needed | |
| More precise and accurate evaluation of the complex three-dimensional shape of the RV. No surrogate to RVEF needed. Evaluation of all RV-pulmonary circulation unit: vascular remodeling can be seen by angiography by loss of peripheral vascular enhancement and ramifications of vascular bed. Good reproducibility can be used to assess response to therapies | Fewer studies have been done, some correlations with other clinical parameters are lacking. Expensive and less available than echocardiography, limited by claustrophobia and ferromagnetic devices | |
| Biomarker of the metabolic shift in the RV and early marker of cardiac dysfunction. Correlated with hemodynamic values, NT-proBNP, several echocardiographic parameters, and long-term prognosis | Not available in every center. Irradiation. Not used in clinical practice yet |
Figure 3Pictures obtained from a 67-year-old man with PH of mixed origin (COPD, left heart dysfunction). 18F-FDG-PET/CT shows a dilation of the RV with an increased and heterogeneous uptake. A hypometabolism of the infero-lateral medial wall is found in the LV (own unpublished data).