| Literature DB >> 27375633 |
Sabrina Carvalho1, Wim H van der Putten2, W H G Hol1.
Abstract
Reliable information on soil status and crop health is crucial for detecting and mitigating disasters like pollution or minimizing impact from soil-borne diseases. While infestation with an aggressive soil pathogen can be detected via reflected light spectra, it is unknown to what extent hyperspectral reflectance could be used to detect overall changes in soil biodiversity. We tested the hypotheses that spectra can be used to (1) separate plants growing with microbial communities from different farms; (2) to separate plants growing in different microbial communities due to different land use; and (3) separate plants according to microbial species loss. We measured hyperspectral reflectance patterns of winter wheat plants growing in sterilized soils inoculated with microbial suspensions under controlled conditions. Microbial communities varied due to geographical distance, land use and microbial species loss caused by serial dilution. After 3 months of growth in the presence of microbes from the two different farms plant hyperspectral reflectance patterns differed significantly from each other, while within farms the effects of land use via microbes on plant reflectance spectra were weak. Species loss via dilution on the other hand affected a number of spectral indices for some of the soils. Spectral reflectance can be indicative of differences in microbial communities, with the Renormalized Difference Vegetation Index the most common responding index. Also, a positive correlation was found between the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index and the bacterial species richness, which suggests that plants perform better with higher microbial diversity. There is considerable variation between the soil origins and currently it is not possible yet to make sufficient reliable predictions about the soil microbial community based on the spectral reflectance. We conclude that measuring plant hyperspectral reflectance has potential for detecting changes in microbial communities yet due to its sensitivity high replication is necessary and a strict sampling design to exclude other 'noise' factors.Entities:
Keywords: Triticum aestivum L.; biodiversity; land use; monitoring; serial dilution; species loss
Year: 2016 PMID: 27375633 PMCID: PMC4899463 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00759
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Overview of the indices used in the manuscript to assess the effect of microbial communities on reflectance.
| Code | Definition | Formula | Description | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRI | Nitrogen reflection index | (R570–R670)/ | Relates to nitrogen content | |
| NDVI | Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) | (R800–R670)/ | Chlorophyll content | |
| RDVI | Re-normalized difference vegetation index | (R805–R710)/ | Sensitive to chlorophyll and nitrogen | |
| EVI | Enhanced vegetation index (EVI) | 2.5∗(R800–R670)/ | Plant physiognomy | |
| REP | Red-edge position | R700+40∗(((R670+ R780)/2–R700)/(R740–R700)) | Nutrient or general plant stress | |
| mREP | Modified red-edge position | (R750–R705)/ | Nutrient or general plant stress | |
| PRIa | Photosynthetic radiation index | (R531–R570)/ | Pigment stress especially Xantophylls due to band 531nm | |
| WI | Water index | (R900/R970) | Water content | |
| DSWI | Disease-water stress index | (R800/R1660) | Related water content changes due to plant diseases | |
| PSa | Plant stress index | (R695/R420) | Plant stress | |
| ARI | Anthocyanin reflectance index | (1/R550) – (1/R700) | Pigment stress especially Anthocyanin | |
| PSRI | Plant senescence reflectance index | (R680–R500)/R750 | Plant senescence indicator due to photosynthesis shift |
Linear discriminant analyses confusion matrices for training/cross-validation and test of unknown samples.
| (A) | Farms | 1 | 2 | C | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training | 1 | 70 | 4 | |||||||
| 2 | 97 | 13 | ||||||||
| Control | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Test | 1 | 35 | 3 | |||||||
| 2 | 52 | 8 | ||||||||
| C | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Int | Grass | Rot | C | 3 | 2 | 1 | C | |||
| Training | Int | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 13 | 4 | ||
| Grass | 16 | 19 | 8 | 2 | 12 | 14 | 2 | |||
| Rot | 17 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 22 | 18 | 7 | |||
| Control | 0 | 0 | 0 | Control | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Test | Int | 7 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 0 | ||
| Grass | 16 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 6 | |||
| Rot | 7 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 14 | 3 | |||
| Control | 1 | 1 | 0 | Control | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||
| Int | Grass | Rot | C | 3 | 2 | 1 | C | |||
| Training | Int | 32 | 25 | 12 | 3 | 18 | 9 | 7 | ||
| Grass | 8 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 2 | |||
| Rot | 7 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 33 | 32 | 8 | |||
| Control | 0 | 0 | 0 | Control | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Test | Int | 14 | 24 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 12 | 1 | ||
| Grass | 7 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 1 | |||
| Rot | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 7 | |||
| Control | 1 | 0 | 0 | Control | 0 | 1 | 0 | |||
Wavelengths and indices which showed significant differences according to dilution treatment.
Bacterial species richness correlates positively with certain hyperspectral indices.
| Both fields | Intensive | Grassland | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ρ | ρ | ρ | ||||
| NRI | 0.243 | 0.212 | 0.454 | 0.092 | 0.143 | 0.643 |
| NDVI | 0.588 | 0.571 | 0.615 | |||
| RDVI | 0.354 | 0.066 | 0.364 | 0.182 | 0.225 | 0.459 |
| EVI | 0.507 | 0.536 | 0.385 | 0.196 | ||
| REP | 0.043 | 0.829 | 0.004 | 0.995 | -0.038 | 0.906 |
| mREP | -0.041 | 0.838 | -0.068 | 0.812 | -0.038 | 0.906 |
| PRIa | 0.248 | 0.203 | -0.146 | 0.602 | 0.505 | 0.081 |
| WI | -0.079 | 0.687 | -0.054 | 0.853 | -0.016 | 0.964 |
| DSWI | 0.042 | 0.833 | -0.186 | 0.507 | 0.071 | 0.821 |
| PSa | 0.131 | 0.505 | 0.339 | 0.216 | 0.104 | 0.737 |
| ARI | 0.195 | 0.318 | 0.457 | 0.089 | 0.011 | 0.978 |
| PSRI | -0.055 | 0.780 | 0.004 | 0.995 | -0.022 | 0.949 |
Effect of soil dilution treatment on spectral indices for grassland and intensive monoculture soils from farm 2.
| Intensive | Grassland | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | A | B | |||||
| NRI | -1.248 | 0.219 | -0.508 | 0.614 | 1.293 | 0.204 | -2.272 | |
| NDVI | -3.891 | -1.336 | 0.189 | -1.507 | 0.140 | 2.209 | 0.032 | |
| RDVI | -2.266 | -0.593 | 0.557 | -1.965 | 0.057 | 3.776 | ||
| EVI | -2.902 | 0.084 | 0.933 | -0.565 | 0.575 | 0.451 | 0.654 | |
| REP | -1.429 | 0.161 | 0.688 | 0.495 | -2.395 | 3.840 | ||
| mREP | -1.233 | 0.225 | -0.525 | 0.602 | -2.402 | 3.693 | ||
| PRIa | -1.826 | 0.075 | -0.181 | 0.857 | -1.907 | 0.064 | 2.752 | |
| WI | -1.514 | 0.138 | 0.409 | 0.684 | -1.832 | 0.075 | 0.172 | 0.865 |
| DSWI | -2.14 | 0.038 | 0.475 | 0.638 | -1.192 | 0.247 | 0.715 | 0.478 |
| PSa | 0.333 | 0.741 | 0.222 | 0.825 | 1.826 | 0.076 | -3.159 | |
| ARI | 0.805 | 0.425 | 1.363 | 0.181 | 2.486 | -3.657 | ||
| PSRI | -0.900 | 0.373 | -0.171 | 0.865 | -2.151 | 0.038 | 3.690 | |