| Literature DB >> 27374856 |
Feifei Zhao1,2, Dolikun Mamatyusupu3, Youxin Wang1,2, Honghong Fang1,2, Hao Wang1,2, Qing Gao1,2, Hao Dong1,2, Siqi Ge1,2, Xinwei Yu1,2, Jie Zhang1,2, Lijuan Wu1,2, Manshu Song4,5, Wei Wang6,7,8.
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies have successfully identified over 70 loci associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in multiple populations of European ancestry. However, the risk attributable to an individual variant is modest and does not yet provide convincing evidence for clinical utility. Association between these established genetic variants and T2DM in general populations is hitherto understudied in the isolated populations, such as the Uyghurs, resident in Hetian, far southern Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, China. In this case-control study, we genotyped 13 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at 10 genes associated with diabetes in 130 cases with T2DM and 135 healthy controls of Uyghur, a Chinese minority ethnic group. Three of the 13 SNPs demonstrated significant association with T2DM in the Uyghur population. There were significant differences between the T2DM patients and controls in the risk allele distributions of rs3792267 (CAPN10) (P = 0.002), rs1501299 (APM1) (P = 0.017), and rs3760776 (FUT6) (P = 0.031). Allelic carriers of rs3792267-A, rs1501299-T, and rs3760776-T had a 2.24-fold [OR (95% CI): 1.35-3.71], 0.59-fold [OR (95% CI): 0.39-0.91], 0.57-fold [OR (95% CI): 0.34-0.95] increased risk for T2DM respectively. We further confirmed that the cumulative risk allelic scores calculated from the 13 susceptibility loci for T2DM differed significantly between the T2DM patients and controls (P = 0.001), and the effect of obesity/overweight on T2DM was only observed in the subjects with a combined risk allelic score under a value of 17. This study observed that the SNPs rs3792267 in CAPN10, rs1501299 in APM1, and rs3760776 in FUT6 might serve as potential susceptible biomarkers for T2DM in Uyghurs. The cumulative risk allelic scores of multiple loci with modest individual effects are also significant risk factors in Uyghurs for T2DM, particularly among non-obese individuals. This is the first investigation having observed/found genetic variations on genetic loci functionally linked with glycosylation associated with the risk of T2DM in a Uyghur population.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990APM1zzm321990; zzm321990CAPN10zzm321990; zzm321990FUT6zzm321990; Uyghur; susceptibility loci; type 2 diabetes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27374856 PMCID: PMC5082412 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12911
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Demographic characteristics and biochemical measures of the study participants
| T2DM ( | Control ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 58.60 ± 11.15 | 56.36 ± 16.81 | 0.200 |
| Gender (male) | 59 (45.4%) | 52 (38.5%) | 0.258 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.49 ± 3.51 | 24.08 ± 3.61 |
|
| SBP (mmHg) | 134.19 ± 18.54 | 120.41 ± 13.13 |
|
| DBP (mmHg) | 90.50 ± 13.42 | 80.42 ± 9.31 |
|
| TC (mmol/l) | 4.99 ± 0.99 | 4.01 ± 1.16 |
|
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.88 ± 0.87 | 1.53 ± 0.70 |
|
| HDL (mmol/l) | 1.24 ± 0.30 | 1.24 ± 0.27 | 0.979 |
| LDL (mmol/l) | 2.83 ± 0.90 | 2.38 ± 0.76 |
|
| FBG (mmol/l) | 8.78 ± 2.42 | 5.33 ± 0.66 |
|
Data are shown as mean ± S.D. The P‐values with statistical significance are indicated in bold numbers. SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; TC: Total cholesterol; TG: Triglycerides; BMI: body mass index; FBG: fasting blood glucose.
Figure 1Matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight single‐nucleotide polymorphism mass spectrum and call cluster plot.
Individual effects of the 13 candidate SNPs for T2DM in the Uyghur participants
| Locus | dbSNP | A/a | T2DM | Control | Chi‐square test | Logistic regression analysis (adjusted for age, gender and BMI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| OR (95% CI) |
| |||
|
| rs3792267 | G | 0.20 | 0.90 | 0.11 | 0.69 |
| 2.24 (1.35–3.71) |
|
|
| rs1501299 | G | 0.19 | 0.84 | 0.27 | 0.44 |
| 0.59 (0.39–0.91) |
|
|
| rs3760776 | C | 0.11 | 0.82 | 0.17 | 0.51 | 0.071 | 0.57 (0.34–0.95) |
|
|
| rs35767 | C/T | 0.28 | 0.91 | 0.20 | 0.39 |
| 1.48 (0.98–2.23) | 0.062 |
|
| rs2237892 | C | 0.18 | 0.51 | 0.17 | 0.63 | 0.753 | 1.05 (0.66–1.67) | 0.841 |
|
| rs2237895 | A/C | 0.36 | 0.60 | 0.39 | 0.19 | 0.458 | 0.85 (0.59–1.22) | 0.381 |
|
| rs2241766 | T/G | 0.20 | 0.004 | 0.22 | 0.51 | 0.606 | 0.94 (0.61–1.44) | 0.780 |
|
| rs4402960 | G/T | 0.31 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.53 | 0.140 | 1.26 (0.85–1.87) | 0.243 |
|
| rs13266634 | C | 0.28 | 0.74 | 0.26 | 0.77 | 0.645 | 1.11 (0.75–1.64) | 0.617 |
|
| rs7754840 | G/C | 0.38 | 0.64 | 0.32 | 0.19 | 0.122 | 1.29 (0.89–1.88) | 0.171 |
|
| rs10483776 | A | 0.14 | 0.78 | 0.15 | 0.51 | 0.681 | 0.86 (0.52–1.42) | 0.548 |
|
| rs7159888 | A | 0.35 | 0.02 | 0.40 | 0.89 | 0.235 | 0.81 (0.56–1.16) | 0.246 |
|
| rs7953249 | G/A | 0.52 | 0.91 | 0.47 | 0.31 | 0.191 | 1.26 (0.88–1.79) | 0.203 |
Risk allele. A/a: major allele/minor allele. The P‐values with statistical significance are indicated in bold numbers. P HWE: P‐value of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test; F minor: minor allele frequency; CAPN10: calpain 10; APM1: aminopeptidase M1; FUT6: fucosyltransferase 6; IGF1: insulin‐like growth factor 1; KCNQ1: potassium voltage‐gated channel, subfamily Q, member 1; IGF2BP2: insulin‐like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 2; SLC30A8: solute carrier family 30 member 8; CDKAL1: cyclin‐dependent kinase 5 regulatory subunit associated protein 1–like 1; FUT8: fucosyltransferase 8; HNF1α: hepatocyte nuclear factor 1, alpha.
Frequencies of the genotypes of rs3792267 (CAPN10), rs1501299 (APM1) and rs3760776 (FUT6) in T2DM patients and controls
| SNP | Genotype | T2DM no. (%) | Control no. (%) |
| Logistic regression analysis (adjusted for age, gender and BMI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominant | Recessive | |||||||
|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) | |||||
| rs3792267 ( | GG | 82 (63.1%) | 108 (80%) |
|
| 2.51 (1.42–4.46) | 0.204 | 2.55 (0.60–10.82) |
| GA | 42 (32.3%) | 25 (18.5%) | ||||||
| AA | 5 (3.8%) | 2 (1.5%) | ||||||
| rs1501299 ( | GG | 85 (65.4) | 69 (51.1) |
|
| 0.51 (0.31–0.85) | 0.732 | 0.91 (0.54–1.53) |
| GT | 39 (30) | 56 (41.5) | ||||||
| TT | 5 (3.8) | 8 (5.9) | ||||||
| rs3760776 ( | CC | 102 (78.5) | 94 (69.6) | 0.113 |
| 0.56 (0.31–0.99) | 0.211 | 0.33 (0.06–1.86) |
| CT | 26 (20) | 36 (26.7) | ||||||
| TT | 2 (1.5) | 5 (3.7) | ||||||
*The P‐values for comparison of statistically difference among the three genotypes for certain SNP between T2DM and control subjects. †The logistic regression model was used to obtain the odds ratios of the minor allele with the major allele as reference group. The P‐values with statistical significance are indicated in bold numbers.
Effect of obesity/overweight on T2DM according to quartiles of risk allelic scores
| Quartiles of risk alleles | T2DM ( | Control ( | OR | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All subject | |||||
| Obese | 82 | 62 | 2.075 | 1.263–3.407 |
|
| Non‐obese | 48 | 73 | |||
| Q1 (≤14) | |||||
| Obese | 28 | 33 | 2.158 | 1.002–4.647 |
|
| Non‐obese | 19 | 43 | |||
| Q2 (15, 16) | |||||
| Obese | 32 | 18 | 2.431 | 1.022–5.782 |
|
| Non‐obese | 16 | 22 | |||
| Q3 (17, 18) | |||||
| Obese | 18 | 10 | 0.667 | 0.150–2.973 | 0.595 |
| Non‐obese | 9 | 4 | |||
| Q4 (≥19) | |||||
| Obese | 4 | 1 | 4.978 | 0.306–81.083 | 0.26 |
| Non‐obese | 4 | 4 | |||
ORs and P‐values on T2DM for obese/overweight and non‐obese subjects were adjusted for age. The P‐values with statistical significance are indicated in bold numbers.