Literature DB >> 27372543

Embedding continuous quality improvement processes in multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: exploring the boundaries between quality and implementation science.

Tracy E Robinson1, Anna Janssen2, Paul Harnett3, Kylie E Museth3, Pamela J Provan3, Danny J Hills4, Tim Shaw2.   

Abstract

Objective The aim of the present study was to identify key enabling factors for engaging multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) in cancer care across the spectrum of translational research and quality improvement (QI) projects. Methods The study was conducted in two large Sydney metropolitan hospitals. Qualitative methods, including structured observations of MDT meetings and semi-structured interviews with MDT leaders and champions, were used to identify how teams interact with and generate research and implementation initiatives. Enabling factors for and barriers to the engagement of MDTs in translational research and QI were identified. Results Four key enabling factors emerged from the analysis of data generated from observing 43 MDT meetings and 18 semi-structured interviews: (1) access to high-quality data around individual and team performance; (2) research-active team leaders; (3) having experts, such as implementation scientists, embedded into teams; and (4) having dedicated research or QI-focused meetings. Barriers included a lack of time, administrative support, research expertise and access to real-time data. Conclusions The identification of enabling factors for and barriers to translational research and QI provides evidence for how multidisciplinary cancer care teams may best be engaged in research and QI that aims to improve service and care outcomes. What is known about the topic? MDTs are key to the delivery of cancer care in Australia, but there is scant research into how teams can best be engaged in translating research from basic science through to implementation science and QI. What does this paper add? This paper provides new evidence from an immersive study of cancer care MDTs in two large metropolitan hospitals in Sydney (NSW, Australia), regarding the key enabling factors for and barriers to successful engagement in translational research and QI in cancer care. What are the implications for practitioners? Cancer care professionals in MDTs are presented with an opportunity to embed translational research and QI into cancer care. MDTs can operate as an ideal vehicle to look beyond individual patient outcomes to broader trends and population health outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27372543     DOI: 10.1071/AH16052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Health Rev        ISSN: 0156-5788            Impact factor:   1.990


  8 in total

1.  Perspectives: Envisioning healthcare quality and safety in 2030.

Authors:  Richard Ricciardi
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2021-03-22

2.  A tool to improve the performance of multidisciplinary teams in cancer care.

Authors:  Lynleigh Evans; Brendan Donovan; Yiren Liu; Tim Shaw; Paul Harnett
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2019-05-31

3.  Developing an Intranet-Based Lymphedema Dashboard for Breast Cancer Multidisciplinary Teams: Design Research Study.

Authors:  Anna Janssen; Candice Donnelly; Judy Kay; Peter Thiem; Aldo Saavedra; Nirmala Pathmanathan; Elisabeth Elder; Phuong Dinh; Masrura Kabir; Kirsten Jackson; Paul Harnett; Tim Shaw
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Aligning implementation science with improvement practice: a call to action.

Authors:  Jennifer Leeman; Catherine Rohweder; Matthew Lee; Alison Brenner; Andrea Dwyer; Linda K Ko; Meghan C O'Leary; Grace Ryan; Thuy Vu; Shoba Ramanadhan
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-09-08

5.  Factors influencing the quality and functioning of oncological multidisciplinary team meetings: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Janneke E W Walraven; Olga L van der Hel; J J M van der Hoeven; Valery E P P Lemmens; Rob H A Verhoeven; Ingrid M E Desar
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.908

6.  The Art of Counseling in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer: Exploratory Investigation among Perceptions of Health Professionals in Southern Italy.

Authors:  Raffaele Addeo; Luca Pompella; Pasquale Vitale; Silvia Ileana Sara Fattoruso; Ilaria Di Giovanni; Francesco Perri; Michele Caraglia; Morena Fasano; Raffaele Arigliani
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  The multidisciplinary team meeting in the UK from the patients' perspective: comments and observations from cholangiocarcinoma patients and their families.

Authors:  Helen Morement; Rachel Harrison; Simon D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2017-09-18

8.  Multidisciplinary teams and ICT: a qualitative study exploring the use of technology and its impact on multidisciplinary team meetings.

Authors:  Anna Janssen; Tracy Robinson; Melissa Brunner; Paul Harnett; Kylie E Museth; Tim Shaw
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.