Literature DB >> 27371114

Higher rates of aneuploidy in blastocysts and higher risk of no embryo transfer in recurrent pregnancy loss patients with diminished ovarian reserve undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Lora K Shahine1, Lorna Marshall2, Julie D Lamb2, Lee R Hickok2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the prediction of aneuploidy rate in blastocysts from patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) on the basis of ovarian reserve testing.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort analysis.
SETTING: Private, university-affiliated fertility clinic. PATIENT(S): A total of 239 patients with RPL, defined as two or more clinical miscarriages, were screened for inclusion. One hundred two (102) cycles in patients with unexplained RPL resulted in at least one euploid embryo transferred. Outcomes were compared by ovarian reserve test results, with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) defined as a cycle day 3 FSH >10 IU/mL and/or antimüllerian hormone <1 ng/mL. INTERVENTION(S): In vitro fertilization with blastocyst biopsy and aneuploidy screening of all 23 chromosome pairs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Rate of aneuploidy in blastocysts and incidence of IVF cycles with no transfer owing to no euploid blasts. RESULT(S): Patients with DOR had a higher percentage of aneuploid blastocysts (57% vs 49%) and a higher incidence of no euploid embryos to transfer (25% vs 13%). The higher rate of aneuploidy in blastocysts was most significant in patients aged <38 years (67% vs 53%). Implantation rates after transfer of euploid blastocysts were similar (61% compared with 59%), and miscarriage rates were low (14% and 10%). CONCLUSION(S): Unexplained RPL patients with DOR have a higher percentage of aneuploid blastocysts and risk of no euploid embryo to transfer compared with unexplained RPL patients with normal ovarian reserve testing. The difference is most significant in patients aged <38 years. Patients with RPL and DOR with euploid embryo transferred had similar outcomes compared with patients with RPL and normal ovarian reserve testing.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneuploidy; diminished ovarian reserve; in vitro fertilization; preimplantation genetic screening; recurrent pregnancy loss

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27371114     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  19 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic testing and chances of a healthy live birth amongst recipients of fresh donor oocytes in the United States.

Authors:  Cassandra Roeca; Rachel Johnson; Nichole Carlson; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Genetics of human female infertility†.

Authors:  Svetlana A Yatsenko; Aleksandar Rajkovic
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.285

3.  Are blastocyst aneuploidy rates different between fertile and infertile populations?

Authors:  Jonathan D Kort; Rajiv C McCoy; Zach Demko; Ruth B Lathi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Prediction of live birth and cumulative live birth rates in freeze-all-IVF treatment of a general population.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Hasan Bulut; Murat Berkkanoglu; Levent Donmez; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Embryo attrition in planned PGT-A: predicting the number of available blastocysts for transfer.

Authors:  C E Gordon; K W Keefe; E S Ginsburg; C Racowsky; A Lanes
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Investigation of the Predictive Factors of Diminished Ovarian Reserve in Women Aged Less Than 40 Years and Undergoing ICSI Cycle.

Authors:  Mohammed M Laqqan; Maged M Yassin
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Maternal and Neonatal Complications in Patients With Diminished Ovarian Reserve in In-Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles.

Authors:  Shuang Han; Yiwei Zhai; Qingqing Guo; Yiming Qin; Peihao Liu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  PGT-A: who and when? Α systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Evangelos Maziotis; Petroula Tsioulou; Sokratis Grigoriadis; Anna Rapani; Polina Giannelou; Marilena Asimakopoulou; Georgia Kokkali; Amelia Pantou; Konstantinos Nikolettos; Nikolaos Vlahos; Konstantinos Pantos
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 9.  Untapped Reserves: Controlling Primordial Follicle Growth Activation.

Authors:  Amanda Kallen; Alex J Polotsky; Joshua Johnson
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 11.951

10.  Degree of mosaicism in trophectoderm does not predict pregnancy potential: a corrected analysis of pregnancy outcomes following transfer of mosaic embryos.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; Sarah K Darmon; David H Barad; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.