Sheila Chanani1, Jeremy Wacksman2, Devika Deshmukh3, Shanti Pantvaidya4, Armida Fernandez4, Anuja Jayaraman4. 1. Society for Nutrition, Education and Health Action, Mumbai, India sheila.chanani@gmail.com. 2. Dimagi, Inc., New Delhi, India. 3. UNICEF, State Consultant for Tribal Development, Mumbai, India. 4. Society for Nutrition, Education and Health Action, Mumbai, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute malnutrition is linked to child mortality and morbidity. Community-Based Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) programs can be instrumental in large-scale detection and treatment of undernutrition. The World Health Organization (WHO) 2006 weight-for-height/length tables are diagnostic tools available to screen for acute malnutrition. Frontline workers (FWs) in a CMAM program in Dharavi, Mumbai, were using CommCare, a mobile application, for monitoring and case management of children in combination with the paper-based WHO simplified tables. A strategy was undertaken to digitize the WHO tables into the CommCare application. OBJECTIVE: To measure differences in diagnostic accuracy in community-based screening for acute malnutrition, by FWs, using a mobile-based solution. METHODS: Twenty-seven FWs initially used the paper-based tables and then switched to an updated mobile application that included a nutritional grade calculator. Human error rates specifically associated with grade classification were calculated by comparison of the grade assigned by the FW to the grade each child should have received based on the same WHO tables. Cohen kappa coefficient, sensitivity and specificity rates were also calculated and compared for paper-based grade assignments and calculator grade assignments. RESULTS: Comparing FWs (N = 14) who completed at least 40 screenings without and 40 with the calculator, the error rates were 5.5% and 0.7%, respectively (p < .0001). Interrater reliability (κ) increased to an almost perfect level (>.90), from .79 to .97, after switching to the mobile calculator. Sensitivity and specificity also improved significantly. CONCLUSION: The mobile calculator significantly reduces an important component of human error in using the WHO tables to assess acute malnutrition at the community level.
BACKGROUND:Acute malnutrition is linked to child mortality and morbidity. Community-Based Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) programs can be instrumental in large-scale detection and treatment of undernutrition. The World Health Organization (WHO) 2006 weight-for-height/length tables are diagnostic tools available to screen for acute malnutrition. Frontline workers (FWs) in a CMAM program in Dharavi, Mumbai, were using CommCare, a mobile application, for monitoring and case management of children in combination with the paper-based WHO simplified tables. A strategy was undertaken to digitize the WHO tables into the CommCare application. OBJECTIVE: To measure differences in diagnostic accuracy in community-based screening for acute malnutrition, by FWs, using a mobile-based solution. METHODS: Twenty-seven FWs initially used the paper-based tables and then switched to an updated mobile application that included a nutritional grade calculator. Human error rates specifically associated with grade classification were calculated by comparison of the grade assigned by the FW to the grade each child should have received based on the same WHO tables. Cohen kappa coefficient, sensitivity and specificity rates were also calculated and compared for paper-based grade assignments and calculator grade assignments. RESULTS: Comparing FWs (N = 14) who completed at least 40 screenings without and 40 with the calculator, the error rates were 5.5% and 0.7%, respectively (p < .0001). Interrater reliability (κ) increased to an almost perfect level (>.90), from .79 to .97, after switching to the mobile calculator. Sensitivity and specificity also improved significantly. CONCLUSION: The mobile calculator significantly reduces an important component of human error in using the WHO tables to assess acute malnutrition at the community level.
Authors: Joris van Dam; Kevin Omondi Onyango; Brian Midamba; Nele Groosman; Norman Hooper; Jonathan Spector; Goonaseelan Colin Pillai; Bernhards Ogutu Journal: BMJ Innov Date: 2017-01-06
Authors: S Goudet; A Jayaraman; S Chanani; D Osrin; B Devleesschauwer; B Bogin; N Madise; P Griffiths Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jessica Bliss; Natasha Lelijveld; André Briend; Marko Kerac; Mark Manary; Marie McGrath; Zita Weise Prinzo; Susan Shepherd; Noël Marie Zagre; Sophie Woodhead; Saul Guerrero; Amy Mayberry Journal: Glob Health Sci Pract Date: 2018-10-04