Literature DB >> 27369284

Clinical evaluation of complete solo surgery with the "ViKY®" robotic laparoscope manipulator.

Masahiro Takahashi1, Masanori Takahashi2, Naoto Nishinari3, Hideki Matsuya3, Tsutomu Tosha3, Yukihiro Minagawa2, Osamu Shimooki2, Tadashi Abe2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advancement in both surgical technique and medical equipment has enabled solo surgery. ViKY® Endoscope Positioning System (ViKY®) is a robotic system that remotely controls an endoscope and provides direct vision control to the surgeon. Here, we report our experience with ViKY®-assisted solo surgery.
METHODS: We retrospectively examined 25 cases of solo surgery TAPP with ViKY®. ViKY® was setup by the surgeon alone, and the setup duration was determined as the time at which the side rail was positioned and that when the endoscope was installed. For assessing the control unit, the number of false movements was counted. We compared the operative results between ViKY®-assisted solo surgery TAPP and the conventional method with an assistant.
RESULTS: The average time to set up ViKY® was 7.9 min. The average number of commands for ViKY® during surgery was 98.3, and the average number of errors and no response of control unit was 7.9. The mean duration of surgery was 136 min for the ViKY® group, including the setup time, and 117 min for the conventional method. No case required an assistant during the operation. There was also no difference between the two groups with regard to postoperative complications and the rate of recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: ViKY® proved reliable in recognizing orders with very few failures, and the operations were performed safely and were comparable to the conventional operations with assistants. Solo surgery with ViKY® was beneficial in this clinical evaluation.

Keywords:  Hernia; Laparoscopic surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic surgery; Solo surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27369284     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5058-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  Trocar and instrument positioning system TISKA. An assist device for endoscopic solo surgery.

Authors:  M O Schurr; A Arezzo; B Neisius; H Rininsland; H U Hilzinger; J Dorn; K Roth; G F Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Robotic surgery: a current perspective.

Authors:  Anthony R Lanfranco; Andres E Castellanos; Jaydev P Desai; William C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  New technology and health care costs--the case of robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Gabriel I Barbash; Sherry A Glied
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Solo-surgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a joystick-guided camera device: a case-control study.

Authors:  Sonja Gillen; Benedikt Pletzer; Arthur Heiligensetzer; Petra Wolf; Jörg Kleeff; Hubertus Feussner; Alois Fürst
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Using a laparoscope manipulator (LAPMAN) in laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

Authors:  Roland Polet; Jaques Donnez
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2008

6.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery. From concept to development.

Authors:  J M Sackier; Y Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (EndoAssist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Aiono; J M Gilbert; B Soin; P A Finlay; A Gordan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection aimed at solo surgery for primary lung cancer.

Authors:  Katsuo Yamada; Shinji Kato
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-06-18

9.  Liquid-injection for preperitoneal dissection of transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal [corrected] hernia repair.

Authors:  Tomoko Mizota; Yusuke Watanabe; Amin Madani; Norihiro Takemoto; Hidehisa Yamada; Saseem Poudel; Yuji Miyasaka; Yo Kurashima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Adverse Events in Robotic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 14 Years of FDA Data.

Authors:  Homa Alemzadeh; Jaishankar Raman; Nancy Leveson; Zbigniew Kalbarczyk; Ravishankar K Iyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of human scope assistant versus robotic scope holder in laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yasushi Ohmura; Hiromitsu Suzuki; Kazutoshi Kotani; Atsushi Teramoto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  [Technical innovations and future perspectives].

Authors:  M Wagner; A Schulze; S Bodenstedt; L Maier-Hein; S Speidel; F Nickel; F Berlth; B P Müller-Stich; Peter Grimminger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Feasibility and Usefulness of a Joystick-Guided Robotic Scope Holder (Soloassist) in Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Yasushi Ohmura; Mari Nakagawa; Hiromitsu Suzuki; Kazutoshi Kotani; Atsushi Teramoto
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-01-31

4.  Efficiency in image-guided robotic and conventional camera steering: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  P J M Wijsman; F J Voskens; L Molenaar; C D P van 't Hullenaar; E C J Consten; W A Draaisma; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comparison of Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic-Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery Using a Joystick-Guided Endoscope Holder (Soloassist II) or a Human Assistant.

Authors:  Jun Sung Kim; Won Cheol Park; Joo Hyun Lee
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2019-08-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.