Literature DB >> 2736910

Song frequency as a cue for recognition of species and individuals in the field sparrow (Spizella pusilla).

D A Nelson1.   

Abstract

Estimate the amount of frequency variation that affected individual and species recognition by song in territorial male field sparrows with field playbacks of neighbors' songs lowered in frequency in 6 increments between 324 and 1296 Hz. Males gave strong responses to neighbors' songs that had been lowered by about 400 Hz, which is about 11% of the mean midfrequency in field sparrow song. Territorial responses were eliminated when neighbors' songs were lowered by more than about 900 Hz. Thus, there is a fairly narrow range of frequencies within which field sparrow songs can vary while functioning in communication. Ss' responses appear to be constrained by the normal range of song frequency variation within the species, but the range of variability within songs of individuals did not influence the degree of frequency shift required to render neighbors' songs unfamiliar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2736910     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.103.2.171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  12 in total

1.  Differential influence of frequency, timing, and intensity cues in a complex acoustic categorization task.

Authors:  Katherine I Nagel; Helen M McLendon; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Distributed recognition of natural songs by European starlings.

Authors:  Daniel Knudsen; Jason V Thompson; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2010-11-01

3.  Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach?

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 4.  Mechanisms of song perception in oscine birds.

Authors:  Daniel P Knudsen; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 5.  A bird brain's view of auditory processing and perception.

Authors:  Katherine Nagel; Gunsoo Kim; Helen McLendon; Allison Doupe
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Discrimination of individual vocalizations by black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapilla).

Authors:  Leslie S Phillmore; Christopher B Sturdy; Martha-Rae M Turyk; Ronald G Weisman
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-02

7.  Effects of urban noise on song and response behaviour in great tits.

Authors:  Emily J Mockford; Rupert C Marshall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Pitch discrimination by ferrets for simple and complex sounds.

Authors:  Kerry M M Walker; Jan W H Schnupp; Sheelah M B Hart-Schnupp; Andrew J King; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Songs of two starling species: common traits versus adaptations to the social environment.

Authors:  C Houdelier; M Hausberger; A J F K Craig
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-11-08

Review 10.  Cortical encoding of pitch: recent results and open questions.

Authors:  Kerry M M Walker; Jennifer K Bizley; Andrew J King; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.