| Literature DB >> 27369066 |
Elena Makovac1,2, David R Watson2, Frances Meeten2,3,4, Sarah N Garfinkel2,5, Mara Cercignani2, Hugo D Critchley2,4,5, Cristina Ottaviani6.
Abstract
Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is characterized by excessive worry, autonomic dysregulation and functional amygdala dysconnectivity, yet these illness markers have rarely been considered together, nor their interrelationship tested longitudinally. We hypothesized that an individual's capacity for emotion regulation predicts longer-term changes in amygdala functional connectivity, supporting the modification of GAD core symptoms. Sixteen patients with GAD (14 women) and individually matched controls were studied at two time points separated by 1 year. Resting-state fMRI data and concurrent measurement of vagally mediated heart rate variability were obtained before and after the induction of perseverative cognition. A greater rise in levels of worry following the induction predicted a stronger reduction in connectivity between right amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and enhanced coupling between left amygdala and ventral tegmental area at follow-up. Similarly, amplified physiological responses to the induction predicted increased connectivity between right amygdala and thalamus. Longitudinal shifts in a distinct set of functional connectivity scores were associated with concomitant changes in GAD symptomatology over the course of the year. Results highlight the prognostic value of indices of emotional dysregulation and emphasize the integral role of the amygdala as a critical hub in functional neural circuitry underlying the progression of GAD symptomatology.Entities:
Keywords: amygdala functional connectivity; emotion regulation; generalized anxiety disorder; heart rate variability; longitudinal; perseverative cognition
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27369066 PMCID: PMC5091683 DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsw091
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci ISSN: 1749-5016 Impact factor: 3.436
Means and correlations between the key variables of the study at time 0 and time 1 in GAD patients and healthy participants
| Mean ± SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. STAI T0 | 45.09 ± 13.10 | 1 | 0.88** | 0.00 | 0.87** | 0.79** | 0.02 |
| 2. PSWQ T0 | 54.59 ± 17.27 | 1 | −0.11 | 0.75** | 0.86** | −0.52 | |
| 3. HRV T0 | 65.17 ± 43.77 | 1 | −0.15 | −0.23 | 0.53** | ||
| 4. STAI T1 | 44.44 ± 12.36 | 1 | 0.79** | 0.14 | |||
| 5. PSWQ T1 | 53.25 ± 17.74 | 1 | 0.14 | ||||
| 6. HRV T1 | 61.63 ± 34.19 | 1 |
STAI, State Trait Anxiety Inventory; PSWQ, Penn State Worry Questionnaire; HRV, Heart Rate Variability; T0, Time 0; T1, Time 1; ** = P < 0.01.
Brain areas showing significant correlations between amygdala connectivity changes over time and cognitive (1) and autonomic (2) responses to the induction and longitudinal modifications in symptoms of anxiety (3a) and autonomic dysregulation (3b) in generalized anxiety disorder patients and healthy participants
| Brain region | Seed | Side | Cluster | Voxel | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) ΔPC (post–pre induction) as predictor of FC longitudinal alterations [T1–T0] | ||||||
| vmPFC | Right amygdala | L | 430 | 0.001 | 3.94 | −12 44 −12 |
| VTA | Left amygdala | 250 | 0.018 | 3.64 | 2 −10 −14 | |
| (2) Δ HRV (post–pre induction) as predictor of FC longitudinal alterations [T1–T0] | ||||||
| Thalamus (temporal region) | Right amygdala | L | 247 | 0.021 | 4.38 | −10 −22 18 |
| (3) Correlation between FC longitudinal alterations [T1-T0] and changes in anxiety symptoms | ||||||
| Middle frontal gyrus | Right amygdala | R | 438 | 0.000 | 4.39 | 38 10 62 |
| dlPFC | Right amygdala | R | 318 | 0.000 | 5.04 | 24 48 8 |
| PCC | Right amygdala | L | 292 | 0.000 | 3.94 | 0 −54 28 |
| Insula | L | 545 | 0.008 | 3.85 | −38 8 −2 | |
| Temporal/angular gyrus | R | 224 | 0.032 | 3.72 | 62 −52 12 | |
PC, perseverative cognition; STAI, State Trait Anxiety Inventory; PSWQ, Penn State Worry Questionnaire; HRV, Heart Rate Variability; T0, Time 0; T1, Time 1.
Fig. 1Cognitive and autonomic responses to the induction of perseverative cognition at time 0 predict changes in functional connectivity from time 0 to time 1. (A) Associations between Δ perseverative cognition (ΔPC) (post–pre induction) and the shift in functional connectivity [Time 1–Time 0] between: right amygdala and vmPFC (negative correlation; left panel) and left amygdala and VTA (positive correlation; right panel). (B) Positive correlation across groups between ΔHRV (post–pre induction) and the shift in functional connectivity [Time 1–Time 0] between right amygdala and temporal thalamus. Note. Correlational plots are for illustrative purposes only. The dashed black line indicates the regression line across both groups; coloured (blue and red) lines indicate the regression line for the each group, separately, and are represented for illustrative purposes only (i.e. to elucidate the influence of each group individual slope on the overall regression).
Fig. 2Changes in functional connectivity from time 0 to time 1 reflect changes in GAD symptomatology (anxiety and autonomic dysfunction). A significant correlation was observed between: (A) ΔSTAI [time 1–time 0] and the shift in functional connectivity [time 1–time 0] between right amygdala and dlPFC (positive correlation) and the PCC (negative correlation); (B) ΔHRV [time 1–time 0] and the shift in functional connectivity [time 1–time 0] between right amygdala and left insula (significant interaction indicating a positive correlation in the group of HC and a negative correlation in GAD) and right temporal/angular gyrus area (positive correlation across both groups). Note. The correlational plots are for illustrative purposes only. The dashed black line indicates the regression line across both groups, coloured (blue and red) lines indicate the regression line for each group, separately, and are represented for illustrative purposes only (i.e. to elucidate the influence of each group individual slope on the overall regression).