Literature DB >> 26306990

Cognitive emotion regulation enhances aversive prediction error activity while reducing emotional responses.

Satja Mulej Bratec1, Xiyao Xie2, Gabriele Schmid3, Anselm Doll4, Leonhard Schilbach5, Claus Zimmer6, Afra Wohlschläger7, Valentin Riedl8, Christian Sorg9.   

Abstract

Cognitive emotion regulation is a powerful way of modulating emotional responses. However, despite the vital role of emotions in learning, it is unknown whether the effect of cognitive emotion regulation also extends to the modulation of learning. Computational models indicate prediction error activity, typically observed in the striatum and ventral tegmental area, as a critical neural mechanism involved in associative learning. We used model-based fMRI during aversive conditioning with and without cognitive emotion regulation to test the hypothesis that emotion regulation would affect prediction error-related neural activity in the striatum and ventral tegmental area, reflecting an emotion regulation-related modulation of learning. Our results show that cognitive emotion regulation reduced emotion-related brain activity, but increased prediction error-related activity in a network involving ventral tegmental area, hippocampus, insula and ventral striatum. While the reduction of response activity was related to behavioral measures of emotion regulation success, the enhancement of prediction error-related neural activity was related to learning performance. Furthermore, functional connectivity between the ventral tegmental area and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, an area involved in regulation, was specifically increased during emotion regulation and likewise related to learning performance. Our data, therefore, provide first-time evidence that beyond reducing emotional responses, cognitive emotion regulation affects learning by enhancing prediction error-related activity, potentially via tegmental dopaminergic pathways.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aversive conditioning; Reappraisal; Rescorla Wagner rule; Ventral tegmental area

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26306990     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  6 in total

Review 1.  Regulating emotion through distancing: A taxonomy, neurocognitive model, and supporting meta-analysis.

Authors:  John P Powers; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Systematic Input-Output Mapping Reveals Structural Plasticity of VTA Dopamine Neurons-Zona Incerta Loop Underlying the Social Buffering Effects in Learned Helplessness.

Authors:  Hongwei Cai; Pei Zhang; Guangjian Qi; Lijun Zhang; Tongxia Li; Ming Li; Xinyuan Lv; Jie Lei; Jie Ming; Bo Tian
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 5.590

3.  Neural and behavioral effects of regulating emotional responses to errors during an implicit racial bias task.

Authors:  Meredith P Levsen; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Amygdala functional connectivity as a longitudinal biomarker of symptom changes in generalized anxiety.

Authors:  Elena Makovac; David R Watson; Frances Meeten; Sarah N Garfinkel; Mara Cercignani; Hugo D Critchley; Cristina Ottaviani
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Your presence soothes me: a neural process model of aversive emotion regulation via social buffering.

Authors:  Satja Mulej Bratec; Teresa Bertram; Georg Starke; Felix Brandl; Xiyao Xie; Christian Sorg
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Differential reinforcement encoding along the hippocampal long axis helps resolve the explore-exploit dilemma.

Authors:  Alexandre Y Dombrovski; Beatriz Luna; Michael N Hallquist
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 14.919

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.