| Literature DB >> 27368700 |
Kun Li1, Yue Lin1, Bin Li2, Taowen Pan2, Fei Wang3, Ruqiang Yuan2, Jianjun Ji2, Yunpeng Diao4, Shouyu Wang5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To extract, purify, and identify the effective constituents of aqueous extract of Fructus Chebulae Immaturus, and analyze the bactericidal effects of total tannins.Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial; Electron microscopy; Ethyl gallate; Fructus Chebulae Immaturus; Total tannin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27368700 PMCID: PMC4930599 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1162-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Results of antibacterial effects of various extractive fractions of Fructus Chebulae Immaturus on KP and SA
| Antibacterial effect | ||
|---|---|---|
| KP | SA | |
|
| ++ | ++ |
| Total tannin crude product | +++ | ++ |
| Total polysaccharide crude product | − | − |
| Total saponin crude product | − | − |
“+” indicates 1–4 mm, “++” indicates 5–8 mm, “+++” indicates 9 mm or above, and “−” indicates no antibacterial effect
Inhibition rates of Fructus Chebulae Immaturus-containing sera on KP and SA
| Inhibition rate % | ||
|---|---|---|
| KP | SA | |
| Positive control group | 80.32 | 73.13 |
| Negative control group | - | - |
| Blank control group | - | - |
|
| 56.32 | 42.14 |
| Total tannin crude product | 66.26 | 58.55 |
Fig. 1Diagram of parent nucleus fragment of chebulic acid
Fig. 2Diagram of n-butyl structure fragment
Fig. 3Structure of tri-n-butyl chebulate
1H,13C-NMR spectral data of tri-n-butyl chebulate [in DMSO-d6, TMS]
| No. | δ H | δ C | No. | δ H | δ C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 162.9 | 1′ | 3.96 (2H, m) | 64.9 | |
| 2 | 2′ | 1.47 (2H, m)a | 30.0d | ||
| 3 | 5.27 (1H, d, J = 0.8 Hz) | 76.4 | 3′ | 1.25 (2H, m)b | 18.5e |
| 4 | 3.70 (1H, dd, J = 0.8 Hz, 7.6 Hz) | 35.7 | 4′ | 0.84 (3H, m)a | 13.5f |
| 5 | 115.7 | 1″ | 3.99 (2H, m) | 64.9 | |
| 6 | 145.5 | 2″ | 1.51 (2H, m)a | 30.0d | |
| 7 | 138.8 | 3″ | 1.29 (2H, m)b | 18.5e | |
| 8 | 142.7 | 4″ | 0.87 (3H, m)c | 13.5f | |
| 9 | 6.92 (1H, s) | 107.5 | 1‴ | 3.90 (2H, t, J = 2.4 Hz) | 63.8 |
| 10 | 114.6 | 2‴ | 1.35 (2H, m)c | 29.9d | |
| 11 | 3.07 (1H, m) | 43.2 | 3‴ | 1.10 (2H, m)b | 18.2e |
| 12 | 2.76 (1H, dd, J = 16.8, 10.8 Hz) | 33.7 | 4‴ | 0.75 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz)c | 13.3f |
| 2.35 (1H, dd, J = 16.8, 4.0 Hz) | |||||
| 13 | 169.3 | ||||
| 14 | 172.4 | ||||
| 15 | 171.0 |
a, b, c, d, e, f: overlap, can be exchanged
Fig. 4Structure of ellagic acid
Fig. 5Structure of ethyl gallate
Fig. 6Structure of arjugenin
Fig. 7Structure of β-sitosterol
MIC and MBC of total tannins, ethyl gallate, and tri-n-butyl chebulate against KP
| NO | MIC (mg/ml) | MBC (mg/ml) |
|---|---|---|
| Total tannins | 0.3125 | 0.625 |
| Ethyl gallate | 0.156 | 0.3125 |
| Tri-n-butyl chebulate | 1.25 | 5 |
Fig. 8Bactericidal curve of ethyl gallate against KP
Fig. 9TEM of normal bacterial morphology. I: 12 h; II: 18 h; III: 24 h
Fig. 10TEM. I: 1/2MIC total tannins; II: 1/2MIC ethyl gallate; III: MIC ethyl gallate
Fig. 11SEM. I: normal bacterial morphology; II: MIC total tannins; III: MIC ethyl gallate; IV: 2MIC ethyl gallate