Literature DB >> 27367586

Stem Cell-Derived Photoreceptor Transplants Differentially Integrate Into Mouse Models of Cone-Rod Dystrophy.

Tiago Santos-Ferreira1, Manuela Völkner2, Oliver Borsch1, Jochen Haas1, Peter Cimalla3, Praveen Vasudevan1, Peter Carmeliet4, Denis Corbeil5, Stylianos Michalakis6, Edmund Koch3, Mike O Karl7, Marius Ader1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Preclinical studies on photoreceptor transplantation provided evidence for restoration of visual function with pluripotent stem cells considered as a potential source for sufficient amounts of donor material. Adequate preclinical models representing retinal disease conditions of potential future patients are needed for translation research. Here we compared transplant integration in mouse models with mild (prominin1-deficient; Prom1-/-) or severe (cone photoreceptor function loss 1/rhodopsin-deficient double-mutant; Cpfl1/Rho-/-) cone-rod degeneration.
METHODS: For photoreceptor transplant production, we combined the mouse embryonic stem cell retinal organoid system with rhodopsin-driven GFP cell labeling by recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV). Organoid-derived photoreceptors were enriched by CD73-based magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) and transplanted subretinally into wild-type, Prom1-/- and Cpfl1/Rho-/- hosts. The survival, maturation, and synapse formation of donor cells was analyzed by immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: Retinal organoids yielded high photoreceptor numbers that were further MACS-enriched to 85% purity. Grafted photoreceptors survived in the subretinal space of all mouse models. Some cells integrated into wild-type as well as Prom1-/- mouse retinas and acquired a mature morphology, expressing rod and synaptic markers in close proximity to second-order neurons. In contrast, in the novel Cpfl1/Rho-/- model with complete photoreceptor degeneration, transplants remained confined to the subretinal space, expressed rod-specific but only reduced synaptic markers, and did not acquire mature morphology.
CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of photoreceptor grafts in preclinical models with incomplete or complete photoreceptor loss, showed differential transplant success with effective and impaired integration, respectively. Thus, Cpfl1/Rho-/- mice represent a potential benchmark model resembling patients with severe retinal degeneration to optimize photoreceptor replacement therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27367586     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.16-19087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  28 in total

Review 1.  Stem cell therapies for retinal diseases: recapitulating development to replace degenerated cells.

Authors:  Cuiping Zhao; Qingjie Wang; Sally Temple
Journal:  Development       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 2.  Persistent remodeling and neurodegeneration in late-stage retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Rebecca L Pfeiffer; Robert E Marc; Bryan William Jones
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 3.  Autologous stem cell therapy for inherited and acquired retinal disease.

Authors:  Mary Ben L Apatoff; Jesse D Sengillo; Eugenia C White; Mathieu F Bakhoum; Alexander G Bassuk; Vinit B Mahajan; Stephen H Tsang
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 4.  CRISPR-Cas9 genome engineering: Treating inherited retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Erin R Burnight; Joseph C Giacalone; Jessica A Cooke; Jessica R Thompson; Laura R Bohrer; Kathleen R Chirco; Arlene V Drack; John H Fingert; Kristan S Worthington; Luke A Wiley; Robert F Mullins; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 5.  Retinal stem cell transplantation: Balancing safety and potential.

Authors:  Mandeep S Singh; Susanna S Park; Thomas A Albini; M Valeria Canto-Soler; Henry Klassen; Robert E MacLaren; Masayo Takahashi; Aaron Nagiel; Steven D Schwartz; Kapil Bharti
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 6.  Cell transplantation to replace retinal ganglion cells faces challenges - the Switchboard Dilemma.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Richard K Lee
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 7.  Development of Stem Cell Therapies for Retinal Degeneration.

Authors:  Emma L West; Joana Ribeiro; Robin R Ali
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 9.708

Review 8.  Rebuilding the Missing Part-A Review on Photoreceptor Transplantation.

Authors:  Tiago F Santos-Ferreira; Oliver Borsch; Marius Ader
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-05

Review 9.  Cell Replacement Therapy for Retinal and Optic Nerve Diseases: Cell Sources, Clinical Trials and Challenges.

Authors:  Rosa M Coco-Martin; Salvador Pastor-Idoate; Jose Carlos Pastor
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 10.  Engineering adeno-associated virus vectors for gene therapy.

Authors:  Chengwen Li; R Jude Samulski
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 59.581

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.