Literature DB >> 27366508

Does Video Laryngoscopy Offer Advantages over Direct Laryngoscopy during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?

Ayten Saraçoğlu1, Olgaç Bezen2, Türker Şengül1, Egin Hüsnü Uğur1, Sibel Şener2, Fisun Yüzer1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Interruption of chest compressions should be minimized because of its negative effects on survival. This randomized, controlled, cross-over study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of Macintosh, Miller, McCoy and McGrath laryngoscopes during with or without chest compressions in the scope of a simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenario.
METHODS: The time required for successful tracheal intubation, number of attempts, dental trauma severity and the need for optimization manoeuvres were recorded during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with and without chest compressions. The experience with computer games during the last 10 years were asked to the participants and recorded.
RESULTS: McCoy laryngoscope yielded the shortest time for successful tracheal intubation both in the presence of and without chest compressions. During the use of McCoy laryngoscopes, fewer tracheal intubation attempts, lower incidence of dental trauma and lower visual analogue scale scores on the ease of intubation were recorded. Participants who are experienced computer game players using Macintosh, McCoy and McGrath achieved successful tracheal intubation in a significantly shorter time during resuscitation without chest compressions. Dental trauma incidence and number of tracheal intubation attempts did not show any significant difference between the four laryngoscopes being related to the rate of playing computer games.
CONCLUSION: McGrath video laryngoscopes do not appear to have advantages over direct laryngoscopes for securing a smooth and successful tracheal intubation during rhythmic chest compressions. We believe that as McCoy laryngoscope provided tracheal intubation in a shorter time and with fewer attempts, this laryngoscope may increase the success rate of resuscitation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tracheal intubation; chest compression; resuscitation

Year:  2015        PMID: 27366508      PMCID: PMC4917139          DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2015.52207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim        ISSN: 2149-276X


  20 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of the A.P. Advance, McGrath, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in normal and difficult intubation scenarios: a manikin study.

Authors:  E Burdett; D J Ross-Anderson; J Makepeace; P A Bassett; S G Clarke; V Mitchell
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Tracheal intubation using Macintosh and 2 video laryngoscopes with and without chest compressions.

Authors:  Young-Min Kim; Ji-Hoon Kim; Hyung-Goo Kang; Hyun Soo Chung; Hyeon-Woo Yim; Seung-Hee Jeong
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.469

Review 3.  Video-laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature.

Authors:  P Niforopoulou; I Pantazopoulos; T Demestiha; E Koudouna; T Xanthos
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 2.105

4.  Comparison of the tracheal intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope and GlideScope® videolaryngoscope by advanced cardiac life support providers in a manikin study.

Authors:  Y J Yuan; F S Xue; Q Wang; J H Liu; J Xiong; X Liao
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Glidescope(®) videolaryngoscope improves intubation success rate in cardiac arrest scenarios without chest compressions interruption: a randomized cross-over manikin study.

Authors:  Theodoros Xanthos; Konstantinos Stroumpoulis; Eleni Bassiakou; Eleni Koudouna; Ioannis Pantazopoulos; Antonios Mazarakis; Theano Demestiha; Nicoletta Iacovidou
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  A randomised controlled trial comparing the McGrath(®) videolaryngoscope with the straight blade laryngoscope when used in adult patients with potential difficult airways.

Authors:  I Ng; X L J Sim; D Williams; R Segal
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  The McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway.

Authors:  A M Taylor; M Peck; S Launcelott; O R Hung; J A Law; K MacQuarrie; D McKeen; R B George; J Ngan
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Comparison of three types of laryngoscope for tracheal intubation during rhythmic chest compressions: a manikin study.

Authors:  J Koyama; T Iwashita; K Okamoto
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  Comparison of optic laryngoscope Airtraq(®) and Miller laryngoscope for tracheal intubation during infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Nobuyasu Komasawa; Kazuaki Atagi; Ryusuke Ueki; Shin-ichi Nishi; Yoshiroh Kaminoh; Chikara Tashiro
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  Case series: the McGrath videolaryngoscope--an initial clinical evaluation.

Authors:  Ben Shippey; David Ray; Dermot McKeown
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.063

View more
  1 in total

1.  [The role of videolaryngoscope in endotracheal intubation training programs].

Authors:  Recai Dagli; Mehmet Canturk; Fatma Celik; Zeynel Abidin Erbesler; Meryem Gurler
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-07-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.