Literature DB >> 27366406

Anaesthesia Techniques for Caesarean Operations: Retrospective Analysis of Last Decade.

Mehmet Aksoy1, Ayşe Nur Aksoy2, Ayşenur Dostbil1, Mine Gürsaç Çelik1, Ali Ahıskalıoğlu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The technique of anaesthesia in caesarean sections is selected according to the patient's clinical presentation, experience of the anaesthesist and the patient's wishes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anaesthesia methods employed in our clinic in the last decade (2003-2012).
METHODS: Records of caesarean operations performed between 2003-2012 in the Anaesthesia department of Atatürk University Medical Faculty and stored in the hospital computer system were examined. The annual distribution of methods of anaesthesia in operations was analysed.
RESULTS: During 2003-2012, 9049 caesarean operations were performed in our clinic. General anaesthesia was used in 45% of operations and regional anaesthesia in 54%. Whereas the rate of regional anaesthesia in 2003 was 34%, this increased to 69% in 2012. The most commonly used method of regional anaesthesia was spinal anaesthesia (34%) in 2003, and spinal anaesthesia (41%) and combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia (27%) in 2012.
CONCLUSION: The most commonly used anaesthesia technique for caesarean operations in our clinic between 2003-2012 was spinal anaesthesia. The most widely used regional anaesthetic method in our clinic was spinal anaesthesia. A significant increase in the use of the combined spinal-epidural anaesthetic technique occurred in the last two years of the study period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean section; anaesthetic techniques; general anaesthesia; regional anaesthesia; retrospective evaluation

Year:  2014        PMID: 27366406      PMCID: PMC4894220          DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2014.80774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim        ISSN: 2149-276X


  15 in total

Review 1.  Combined spinal-epidural techniques.

Authors:  T M Cook
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Use of combined spinal-epidural by obstetric anaesthetists.

Authors:  H J Blanshard; T M Cook
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 3.  Obstetric anesthesia: changes and choices.

Authors:  William F McCool; Jana Packman; Arthur Zwerling
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.388

4.  [Obstetric anesthesia in Catalonia, Spain].

Authors:  Sergi Sabaté; Carmen Gomar; Jaume Canet; Carmen Fernández; Marisol Fernández; Albert Fuentes
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 1.725

5.  Combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia.

Authors:  Narinder Rawal
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 6.  Anesthesia-related maternal mortality.

Authors:  Joy L Hawkins
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.190

7.  [Comparison of the maternal and neonatal effects of combined spinal-epidural block and spinal block for cesarean section].

Authors:  Ersin Uysallar; Semra Karaman; Ilkben Günüşen; Meltem Uyar; Vicdan Fırat
Journal:  Agri       Date:  2011-10

8.  [Anesthesia and analgesia in obstetrics].

Authors:  B von Hundelshausen
Journal:  Ther Umsch       Date:  2002-12

Review 9.  Anaesthesia for urgent (grade 1) caesarean section.

Authors:  Vegard Dahl; Ulrich J Spreng
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 10.  Recent advances in obstetric anesthesia.

Authors:  Rachel Farragher; Sanjay Datta
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.078

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine on the mother's awareness and neonatal Apgar scores in caesarean section under general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Kenan Kart; Ayse Hanci
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 1.671

2.  Comparative evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine in cesarean section using spinal anesthesia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Xiongjie Zhang; Xujian Wang; Jinyan Wang; Hao Wang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 1.671

3.  The current practice of aspiration prophylaxis in obstetric anesthesia: a survey among non-physician anesthetic providers working in hospitals in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Metages Hunie; Efrem Fenta; Simegnew Kibret; Diriba Teshome
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  The Effect of Anaesthetic Techniques on Maternal and Cord Blood Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Levels.

Authors:  Mehmet Aksoy; Ayşe Nur Aksoy; Ali Ahıskalıoğlu; İlker İnce; Esra Laloğlu; Ayşenur Dostbil; Mine Gürsaç Çelik
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-03-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.